[Usability] Friendly words from an application

2005-01-24 Thread Kalle Vahlman
't call the user a quitter if their work is not saved, they would enjoy the experience more. This in fact is what IIRC the HIG recommends also. Have you finished reading this message?-) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Usability mailing list

Re: [Usability] Friendly words from an application

2005-01-25 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ly trusted me to know better than itself. Something that is quite annoying in applications if not easily overridden. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] Spatiality does not mean that navigational facilities cannot exist

2005-02-01 Thread Kalle Vahlman
("whip up" is a relaxed way to say "desing a good algorithm to find out which visited folders are actually worth to keep in the list" ;) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] Spatiality does not mean that navigational facilities cannot exist

2005-02-01 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:46:38 +0100, Maurizio Colucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > Why should it be a sidebar? > > Look at it this way. Do you use tabbed browsing? I suppose so. Would you > like it if the tab-bar became a popup list? I guess no

Re: [Usability] Spatiality does not mean that navigational facilities cannot exist

2005-02-01 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 16:06:08 +0100, Maurizio Colucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:46:38 +0100, Maurizio Colucci > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > FWIW, I have not used

Re: [Usability] gedit's Save A Copy

2005-03-02 Thread Kalle Vahlman
u would be editing the copied document after the operation. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] Interacting with open folders, part 2.

2005-03-02 Thread Kalle Vahlman
e mostly unused window key. And before anyone cries "undiscoverable!", the modifier keys always are. But that does not mean we should not use them at all. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.o

Re: [Usability] Repeated Apply/OK, should it be allowed?

2005-03-11 Thread Kalle Vahlman
d mean "touching" the target, changing the modification time. This could be valuable in some applications where it triggers an update for other parts of the app (like for example 'make'). This would not be a common situation however, and probably better hanled by a dedicated UI, so

Re: [Usability] How is this done? (use same Entries both for edit and add data to a TreeView)

2005-03-28 Thread Kalle Vahlman
screen (the words), and so save some screen space. It could make it a little confusing, too. The synonyms could even be in a GtkCellRendererCombo, but that could be even more confusing (how do you add new items?) and undiscoverable. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re: [Usability] How is this done? (use same Entries both for edit and add data to a TreeView)

2005-03-30 Thread Kalle Vahlman
NOTE: I have not used this program, so I'm not sure if I know how it is supposed to work... On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:03:40 +0200, Leif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > Perhaps you could have the list behave like that on irksu, and have > > the right

Re: [Usability] A problem in GEdit menu entry

2005-07-14 Thread Kalle Vahlman
as long as it Works. (I have no comments on the actual issue) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] tools on the desktop

2005-07-30 Thread Kalle Vahlman
b) make mistakes frequent, and in this case, non-trivial ones that eject your disc when you try to acces it -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] tools on the desktop

2005-07-31 Thread Kalle Vahlman
to a file on a USB dongle and remove it before the buffered write to it is finished? If you find text files too small, try to imagine the same with nautilus and .oggs. That copy dialog goes away way before the data is on the actual device. "caching data" sounds like the problem we a

Re: [Usability] Mail clients put the Subject field in the wrong place

2005-09-17 Thread Kalle Vahlman
specifically after send (like a dialog) is pretty much asking for it[1]. [1] Sorry for the pun, it was asking for it[2]. [2] I'll stop this time for real. Unless someone shows up asking for it. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi

Re: [Usability] Running gnome-terminal as a desktop background

2005-09-17 Thread Kalle Vahlman
lable even if I don't change anything. Of course it complains that it doesn't know where to send it, but that's already too late, the user was finished with the message and now has to mentally go back to it because he was allowed to try to send

Re: [Usability] Mail clients put the Subject field in the wrong place

2005-09-19 Thread Kalle Vahlman
Ok, so it could be three or four if you count cc and bcc but I consider them grouped with to: which is only logical way to handle them in my opinion -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] Indicating required fields

2005-09-19 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/9/19, Matthew Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 17 Sep, 2005, at 4:11 PM, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > ... > > Now that I think about it, what possible reason does Evolution have to > > accept a message for sending if the subject is not there? > >

Re: [Usability] Indicating required fields

2005-09-19 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ut I hoped there was a way to implement the "mandatory" hint without adding text. Your "(required)" example shows why, the relatively unimportant hint (when compared to the "what I need to write here" and to the input area) takes up as much space as the lab

Re: [Usability] Indicating required fields

2005-09-20 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/9/20, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:58:05 +0300 > > From: Kalle Vahlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: Usability gnome conference >

Re: [Usability] Indicating required fields

2005-09-22 Thread Kalle Vahlman
6 1429 EDT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " So here's the new slim UI for our email client that implements only the essential: To: [.........] [ Send ] -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___

Re: [Usability] Indicating required fields

2005-09-22 Thread Kalle Vahlman
Let's add a little context to be clear: 2005/9/22, Kalle Vahlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2005/9/22, Marc O'Morain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html > > The subject field is not required in an email... > > If want to go down t

Re: [Usability] Default document formats

2005-09-22 Thread Kalle Vahlman
27;t think any open software should default to closed formats as long as valid open ones are available. That would be admitting that the closed formats are good(sometimes) and fine(not really) and we love them(nevers!). Which, I hope, is not true. And don't bother repeating the fact that us

Re: [Usability] Configuration Applications

2005-10-05 Thread Kalle Vahlman
her gripes, I think the settings capplet reworking has been undergoing for some time now (at least the talking of it), but can't find any status page or similar for it... -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] Hiding options from users?

2005-10-12 Thread Kalle Vahlman
it isn't > there. Have you tried the context menu? Although I do agree that select all should be in the "Edit" menu, as it is a standard action. You probably should file a bug about it, if there isn't one already or if it is

Re: [Usability] Hiding options from users?

2005-10-12 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/10/12, Michael Knepher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On 10/12/05, Kalle Vahlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2005/10/12, Sven Jaborek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I searched for a way in evolution to mark all messages read without > > > ctrl-a,

Re: [Usability] The filechooser

2005-10-13 Thread Kalle Vahlman
om the context menu. > Up until now I have mostly tried to avoid using it at all, but since that's > nearly impossible I think I'm better off learning how to use it instead. That's a great additude! Keep it up ;) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movi

Re: [Usability] A (rather long) list of GNOME usability issues

2005-10-17 Thread Kalle Vahlman
moved over $TOLERANCE pixels and then decide whether to raise the window or not. If release happens within the timeout, then you can raise immediately. Maybe also if there's nothing to drag under the cursor. The tricky part is to determine what the value of $TOLERANCE is so that you d

Re: [Usability] A (rather long) list of GNOME usability issues

2005-10-18 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/10/18, Tuomas Kuosmanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 14:37 +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > > With metacity, using ALT while clicking works, but is of course a > > little inconvenient. > > Yeah. Though Alt conflicts with Gimp's and Ink

Re: [Usability] New "Add to panel" dialog

2005-10-19 Thread Kalle Vahlman
rth another font setting either. But, if you are fixed on the 2D-canvas idea ;), you might consider implementing zoom to it. That could give you some control over the size of things (including the font), but without making it suck for some by default. 100% could have the app font size, 75% could

Re: [Usability] ThreePointZero worries

2005-10-27 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/10/27, Estradin Solaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Innovation cannot be held at the cost of usability. User expectations should not constrain innovation either. But both of these statements are black and white, while usability tends to be more greyish. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL

Re: [Usability] Media Controls

2005-10-30 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ers getting confused, how many do you think look at the nae "File" instead of just opening the first menu? I think the placement is more important factor here than the name. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] Media Controls

2005-10-30 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/10/30, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:07:08 +0200 > > From: Kalle Vahlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: usability@gnome.org > > Subj

Re: [Usability] Find always under Edit menu? (Evolution)

2005-10-31 Thread Kalle Vahlman
esumably due to the number of items being high enough (5) and due to the Edit menu being very full already (specially if you have certain plugins on). -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gn

Re: [Usability] keyboard shortcut for Find Previous

2005-11-28 Thread Kalle Vahlman
rs. I thought the word "Guidelines" would prevent you from _requiring_ somebody to do something ;) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] keyboard shortcut for Find Previous

2005-11-28 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/11/28, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 15:53 +0200, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > > I thought the word "Guidelines" would prevent you from _requiring_ > > somebody to do something ;) > > Well yes, the wording is tricky, otherw

Re: [Usability] The new shrinked/expanded save as dialog

2005-12-04 Thread Kalle Vahlman
file to be overwritten so it's only natural to allow that ;) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] The new shrinked/expanded save as dialog

2005-12-04 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ght be very annoying if you don't use bookmarks or have clever programs. I think it was even suggested a while ago. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] The new shrinked/expanded save as dialog

2005-12-04 Thread Kalle Vahlman
While this may not always be true, on could argue that it's the common case ;) I'd hate to have to toggle it off explicitly, I don't edit my dot-files *that* often (and usually do that from the terminal anyways...). -- Kalle Vahlma

Re: [Usability] Nautilus Actions : Usability issue, request for comments

2005-12-07 Thread Kalle Vahlman
e (%u I'd think). Otherwise making dialogs fit better to 800x600 rocks (I have that on my laptop so I care), so my hat is off for anyone doing such work! -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list U

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-12-13 Thread Kalle Vahlman
asy and there's some options included in the base GNOME distribution) than to constantly fight over which of the hip themes should be the default today. Remember how the Aqua look was so popular that everybody had a theme with glassy buttons? How many still uses that

Re: [Usability] file selector - dropping to it, and bugs

2005-12-13 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ders (to change the current selection). I wish it would automatically accept the dialog too if a file is dropped there, but not sure if it would have bad side-effects... -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi ___ Usability maili

Re: [Usability] Escape Closing Dialog

2005-12-13 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ity value, also the 770 has the escape button closing all dialogs, although it's not done at the Gtk+ level AFAIK. And look how big of a fuss it has made! Must be a real sales booster, GNOME would probably go out of stock too if it ever had that feature. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Usability] Better look Re: (no subject)

2005-12-14 Thread Kalle Vahlman
somebody would. I'd contribute, but my artistic/graphical skillZ have proven to be of no use when the target is "attractive" :) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi __

Re: [Usability] Better look Re: (no subject)

2005-12-14 Thread Kalle Vahlman
kground) For contributing icons, the Tango project (http://tango-project.org) should be kept in mind. Contributing other parts: create them, submit to art.gnome.org, advertise. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi __

Re: [Usability] Better look Re: (no subject)

2005-12-14 Thread Kalle Vahlman
this matter, it really needs to be a consensus. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] Better look Re: (no subject)

2005-12-14 Thread Kalle Vahlman
; we would be the first and would be NO clutter "Being first" is not "being good". (also one from my bag of opinions) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usabi

Re: [Usability] Better look Re: (no subject)

2005-12-14 Thread Kalle Vahlman
It's been a while since I've taken math classes (hint: 2 is not a word, it's a number), but if you are saying that you'd provide a mockup of what you mean then by all means. Nothing tells it better than a pretty picture :) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Power

Re: [Usability] Better look Re: (no subject)

2005-12-14 Thread Kalle Vahlman
k for GNOME won't be just a matter of snapping fingers. The last time the look changed, there was a long discussion about it, even though the change was far from radical. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___

Re: [Usability] Better look Re: (no subject)

2005-12-15 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 12/15/05, Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 14:33 +0200, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > On 12/14/05, Josue Farde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > thanks kalle > > > > > > but does that means that there isn't a respons

Re: [Usability] Better look Re: (no subject)

2005-12-17 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ame the project for lacking leadership (which is a common feature of OSS communities, not really a bug in them). So you want something decided, bring something to decide on (in yes/no form) to the table. Simple as that. If you start formalizing the process, it loses interest for a lot of people,

Re: [Usability] I just want say: thanks

2005-12-20 Thread Kalle Vahlman
king on these projects has the same amount of coolness, it's just the packaging that changes. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnom

Re: [Usability] Reasoning behind default panel setup?

2006-01-10 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ormal" users are better off without it. (I don't use virtual desktops nor the taskbar, just the window list and most of the time I'm just fine with it) /me parades around with "we don't want the workspace switcher (by default)" banner -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Usability] MOTD Not Displayed; Column View for Nautilus; File Manipulation Tool; Browser Spell Checking

2006-01-10 Thread Kalle Vahlman
spot IMO), as would many others. There's the nautilus scripting framework to implement these, so I don't think a complete power tool would be necessary. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] Reasoning behind default panel setup?

2006-01-11 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ng, adding virtual desktops would not have helped... And I think the default setup should probably concentrate on home users since workplace setups usually have custom configuration adapted to the needs and policies of the businness anyway. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://mo

Re: [Usability] Reasoning behind default panel setup?

2006-01-11 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 1/11/06, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:54:02PM +0200, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > On 1/11/06, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The switcher gives visibility to this great feature that should not be > > >

Re: [Usability] MOTD Not Displayed; Column View for Nautilus; File Manipulation Tool; Browser Spell Checking

2006-01-15 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 1/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 23:48, Kalle Vahlman wrote: > > On 1/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I have a few suggestions I would like to raise

Re: [Usability] Reasoning behind default panel setup?

2006-01-26 Thread Kalle Vahlman
o. I think this thread was about the current default panel layout. Re-implementing the gnome-panel isn't really the answer for right now (although it could be for the future), so maybe the subject line should change... -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi In

Re: [Usability] GNOME need a big usability update

2006-02-06 Thread Kalle Vahlman
(and not-so-great) ideas. Which went nowhere since nobody started to code. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] "Advanced" button?

2006-02-16 Thread Kalle Vahlman
would _prefer_ instead of really _need_ (and thus any reply with "no, it works fine this way" causes them to get annoyed and start throwing the "usability" word around ;). Focus on getting to the goal and the tool to get there will be insignificant (as it should be). -- Ka

Re: [Usability] UI review outcomes

2006-02-20 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 2/20/06, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IRC logs are now online: > > http://usability.gnome.org/ui-review/2.13.html > > I know about the screensaver typo, I'll fix it when I upload the > epiphany log :) What typo?-) (it's a "finglish&quo

Re: [Usability] Language settings

2006-03-01 Thread Kalle Vahlman
e not best to be the same, and changing these temporarilary when launching programs is often useful too. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] Describing actions

2006-03-12 Thread Kalle Vahlman
might open a file with the menu > command, or with the Return key, or Ctrl+O. Agreeing with this one, but... > (BTW, the actual label says "Run executable text files > when they are clicked". I've filed a bug.) ...this is valid in my case (I don't use double-click anywh

Re: [Usability] we need interoperability

2006-04-17 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ction as needed. > > ImageMagick. Or the Gimp batch mode: http://www.gimp.org/tutorials/Basic_Batch/ Granted, this does require one to learn a little more than simple command line arguments (but then again, Gimp is far from "simple" anyway :). -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Usability] Empty menus in UIManager (bug: #171424)

2007-03-18 Thread Kalle Vahlman
but that's a bit too far fetched to be a real concern. So, if there is nobody with opposing arguments, could this go in sometime soon? [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171424 [2] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=58986&action=view -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMA

Re: [Usability] How do I get my media volumes out of my computer?

2007-03-21 Thread Kalle Vahlman
relatively long with the spinning speeds being so high, unless the motor technology has recently seen drastic improvements that I'm not aware of. [1] This can of course be controlled by setup as usual, but less setup needed would be a better answer. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Po

Re: [Usability] desktop lacks "Display properties" or " Screensaver - Power" options on right-click context menu

2007-04-23 Thread Kalle Vahlman
context. Have you looked at the Tango icon theme? The HD icon from the Tango theme is the "box" in question. So you are ranting to get things to where they already are... -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___

Re: [Usability] Integration and Standardisation of Notification area and behaviour

2007-04-29 Thread Kalle Vahlman
st opened Finder with the location of the application, not too useful IMO...). -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.g

Re: [Usability] Gnome HIG suggestion: search box clear buttons

2007-06-03 Thread Kalle Vahlman
s a close button and the active tab closes". -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] About Me Applet

2007-06-12 Thread Kalle Vahlman
M/VOIP/whatnot integrated to the GNOME desktop (when, not if ;). People who _are_ paranoid about their personal data can ignore the applet just as they ignore the fields traditional unix user accounts have (phone, room number etc). -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi

Re: [Usability] Inconsistent file size units

2007-07-15 Thread Kalle Vahlman
to refuse such things). Don't remember seeing it on desktop-devel yet, so perhaps re-sending to there might be approperiate (both i18n and usability lists have narrower audience and d-d-l is where the discussion and eventual consensus should be happening). -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROT

Re: [Usability] date format

2007-08-21 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ther.) > Of course, you could encapsulate this in a launcher icon for easy access > too. Note that if you have LC_ALL set to something, the LC_TIME has no effect (at least for me): $ LC_ALL=fi_FI LC_TIME=en_GB date ti elokuun 21. 13:58:56 EEST 2007 $ LC_ALL= L

Re: [Usability] gdm user/pass prompt

2007-09-07 Thread Kalle Vahlman
M prompt have any specific issues that would induce this behaviour or was this just a poll? -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http

Re: [Usability] debugger installed by default

2007-10-16 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ng lists or issue tracker, since it is not really an issue GNOME upstream can influence (there are no binary releases of GNOME), nor would this usability-focused mailing list be the right place to ask such things. Cheers, -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi

Re: [Usability] Are the gnome-terminal's Profiles really necessary?

2007-12-05 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ps the "modify profile" consept isn't the most obvious way to change settings in that scenario. -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi ___ Usability mailing list Usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Re: [Usability] guidelines for windowsizes

2008-02-26 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ting smaller dialogs already few years ago when I used a low-end laptop. Now I've got a internet tablet with the approximately same resolution... Funny how it all revolves back to where it began ;) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff a

Re: [Usability] Gome is Too BIG..

2008-03-12 Thread Kalle Vahlman
smells like eeePC so, Actually eeePC:s and other similar devices are generally 800x480 (and the bigger screen versions 1024x600). [snip large signature] Wow, I bet that didn't fit in 800x600 ;) -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://sysl

Re: [Usability] inability to experiment

2008-05-23 Thread Kalle Vahlman
ign (code-wise) I could imagine that adding such functionality would not be too taxing everywhere. Bugzilla seems to be down right now, but the launcher dialog should probably be mentioned in the bug Calumn pointed to... -- Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Powered by http://movi

Re: [Usability] RFC: Revision of HIGs "Check Boxes" section

2008-07-28 Thread Kalle Vahlman
is necessary, present it as a sentence in a smaller font (not in >italics) aligned underneath the label. (This time the indicative >form is appropriate, with the checkbox as the implied subject.) Useful note, so lose the parenthesis. Some useful pointers seem to have been dropped, wi

Re: [Usability] RFC: Revision of HIGs "Check Boxes" section

2008-07-30 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2008/7/29 Matthew Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Kalle > > Thanks for your comments. > > Kalle Vahlman wrote on 28/07/08 10:19: >>... >>>== Text == >>> >>>A checkbox should always have a label, and (except in the rare >>&

Re: [Usability] Double-click feedback in Gnome

2008-08-08 Thread Kalle Vahlman
op files. This could be > incomplete. If so, bugs should be filed. There's a bug for nautilus not providing feedback on Desktop: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121138 I suppose the scope of that could be extended to all new nautilus windows since there no longer is a throbber

Re: [Usability] Tab implementation review

2009-02-12 Thread Kalle Vahlman
rt would do much more good in designing and implementing a better way to handle multiple views (eg. improving window management or using a canvas approach) than what tabs can offer... -- Kalle Vahlman, z...@iki.fi Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://sandbox.

Re: [Usability] Tab implementation review

2009-02-12 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2009/2/12 Allan Day : > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:17 +0200, Kalle Vahlman wrote: >> 2009/2/9 Allan Day : >> > Hey all, >> > >> > I've been working (on and off) on reviewing all the bugs and other >> > discussions on tabs in GNOME [1]. It's rea

Re: [Usability] Tab implementation review

2009-02-12 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2009/2/12 Mackenzie Morgan : > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 15:31 +0200, Kalle Vahlman wrote: >> I just don't belive tabs *can* be streched that far with worthwhile >> results, and thus I think it would be wiser to direct effort to fix >> the WM... > > So, in my way of

Re: [Usability] Tab implementation review

2009-02-24 Thread Kalle Vahlman
actually belong to, simply having one corner of the rectangular window placed where the mouse was clicked is just not enough. That would still leave the other item selected, so it wouldn't be a big win. -- Kalle Vahlman, z...@iki.fi Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://sandbo