Hello,
Got this idea about starting an initiative to recognize apps that comply
with GNOME standards, which may or may not be limited to the HIG. I'm not
sure what else to consider.
The motivation behind is to pay homage to those deserving projects, promote
the use of those apps vs. noncompliant
Additional things beyond GNOME HIG compliance to test/report:
- a11y support
- i18n support
- infrastructure (mailing list, issue tracker, website)
- license / copyright-assignment requirement
- release schedule and adherence
This is basically the criteria that I assume are used to judge apps
for
Sounds good, Gabriel. I think that's the entire list of "standards" that we
should look at.
The topic of GNOME standards for the idea of "GNOME Apps" for GNOME 3.0 may
have already been discussed in detail somewhere else. If it has been, please
point it out.
In addition to clarifying the criteria
