I think it would be awesome to have a free software equivalent to Dropbox
and even more awesome to have one created by a KDE/GNOME team.
The GNOME Foundation would be interested in hosting the services part. We'd
need to talk about requirements.
Stormy
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Mario Đani
this seems like ubuntu one
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Stormy Peters wrote:
> I think it would be awesome to have a free software equivalent to Dropbox
> and even more awesome to have one created by a KDE/GNOME team.
>
> The GNOME Foundation would be interested in hosting the services part.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>
> Your offer to host it on the GNOME infrastructure sounds interesting. Do
> you think this can be done for free for everybody with hosting fees?
>
>
We don't really know yet. We are going to host Tomboy Online. That should
give us more o
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 09:30 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
>
> We don't really know yet. We are going to host Tomboy Online. That
> should give us more of an idea of hosting costs. I'd expect something
> like a Dropbox to have much higher costs but hopefully we can predict
> them from Tomboy.
>
> Th
Stormy,
its very nice to say that GNOME Foundation is willing to host the
services part. My initial talk with Mairin, when we were not aware of
OwnCloud is to use ssh account. But this makes it so much better!
Please also note that OwnCloud is supposed to be more then just plain
Dropbox replaceme
Hi Stormy,
this sounds great. I think KDE and GNOME should definitely work together here.
Please note that the idea of onwCloud is that everybody can host it
individually. A hosted solution is of course also possible.
At the beginning we plan to have a file hosting solution like dropbox, but the
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:34 -0430, Dokuro wrote:
> this seems like ubuntu one
Unfortunately, Ubuntu One is not open source so it doesn't really help
us at all.
~m
___
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usa
Have you talked to Canonical about open sourcing it?
Stormy
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:34 -0430, Dokuro wrote:
> > this seems like ubuntu one
>
> Unfortunately, Ubuntu One is not open source so it doesn't really help
> us at all.
>
> ~m
>
>
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:17 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:34 -0430, Dokuro wrote:
> > this seems like ubuntu one
>
> Unfortunately, Ubuntu One is not open source so it doesn't really help
> us at all.
The client and the protocol are entirely open source. Just for
referenc
is half and half, at least the client is open...
keep working on the server side..
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:17 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:34 -0430, Dokuro wrote:
>> > this seems like ubuntu one
>>
>> Unfortunately, U
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:28 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:17 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:34 -0430, Dokuro wrote:
> > > this seems like ubuntu one
> >
> > Unfortunately, Ubuntu One is not open source so it doesn't really help
> > us at all.
>
> The
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:18 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
> Have you talked to Canonical about open sourcing it?
My assumption is that if they were in a position to open source it they
already would have (as they did for the client and protocol.)
~m
___
On 23 March 2010 18:29, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:18 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
>> Have you talked to Canonical about open sourcing it?
>
> My assumption is that if they were in a position to open source it they
> already would have (as they did for the client and protocol.)
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:41 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> Hmm, okay, sorry I was confused. I guess it seems to me the server is a
> moot point for the GNOME Usability list :)
It's not a moot point; we're talking about tools for usability
practitioners to use as discussed at the UX hackfest. If we w
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:19 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:28 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:17 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:34 -0430, Dokuro wrote:
> > > > this seems like ubuntu one
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, Ubuntu One is
This may be slightly off topic but would it be possible to design the server
in such a way that not only system administrators could setup and manage but
also the advanced home user? From a usability standpoint it would be nice
to have the application be broad enough so many people could use it ea
16 matches
Mail list logo
