> > This patch makes small changes to the HIG's "Progress windows" section.
> >
> > * New: "A progress window should always appear as an independent
> > window in a window list. If progress of a task makes a window
> > temporarily unusable, do not present a modal dialog-like progress
> > window in
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 08:51 +, Allan Day wrote:
> > > This patch makes small changes to the HIG's "Progress windows" section.
> > >
> > > * New: "A progress window should always appear as an independent
> > > window in a window list. If progress of a task makes a window
> > > temporarily unusa
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 21:46 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 17:13 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> > This patch makes small changes to the HIG's "Progress windows" section.
>
> Should patches be proposed and discussed on this list, or on
> bugzilla.gnome.org, or is either OK?
Heya,
We had a GNOME Usability hackfest last week in London, and a couple of
TODO items, and questions cropped up which I thought I would share.
For all those tasks, if resources are scarce to get the work done, I
think adding those as ideas for the upcoming GSoC 2010 would be good,
once technica
Jan:
Within the last weeks, me and Jan-Christoph Borchardt student joined the
list because we are both interested in usability and want to push open
source further.
That's great!
Maybe there is a strong interest by other young and motivated students
at universities who would like improve th
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 16:44 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
> In the gtk side, I don't know much about the XSettings, but I suppose
> that you are talking more general, and XSetting will manage all the
> gtk modules to be loaded (engines, and so on). So XSettings would have
> the lists of modules instead of
From: Bastien Nocera
CCing gnome-accessibility list, as probably I will forgot several
things.
> - a11y instant-on (if not instant-off)
> a11y is enabled in applications when the XSettings mention that the GTK+
> modules should be loaded. We could make GTK+ programs instant-apply the
> XSettings
From: Cosimo Cecchi
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 16:44 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
>
>> In the gtk side, I don't know much about the XSettings, but I suppose
>> that you are talking more general, and XSetting will manage all the
>> gtk modules to be loaded (engines, and so on). So XSettings would have
>> t
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 14:57 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Widgets
> [...]
> - Others?
This might be off topic, depending amongst others what is still
considered a widget, and I'm not sure what's the correct terminology for
this, but the issue discussed in bug 411787
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/sh
I'have just seen this problem of removing icons, GNOME have not to*
impose their choices* for menus and toolbar without icons.
Especially if they remove the interface tab that allow people to restore
icons in menus and toolbar.
I already thought that removing icons by default was a very bad idea,
10 matches
Mail list logo
