I am surprised that nobody has an opinion about this. I was worried
about bike-shedding.
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 09:23 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> I'd like the HIG to contain some simple suggestions for document-based
> applications that are not tabbed. I'd like to avoid general conceptual
> stuf
I sent it to Murray but it have to be sent to the mailing-list... (a
mistake)
HI,
Yes, i think it could be good to do a list of thing that document-based
applications have to provide. You will be able to see what apps provide
it or not.
I think you could start some "ui-guide" that give the
Murray Cumming a écrit :
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 17:37 +0100, anthony wrote:
I answer to you, but the mail hasn't reached you...
You are not answering on the mailing list and your email is hard for me
to understand.
That's why i sent my mail on the mailing-list :)
I said :
HI,
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:23 AM, usability-boun...@gnome.org wrote:
...
Are there objections to the HIG saying this, in the appropriate
sections?:
0. An application is "document-based" if it loads and saves documents.
Agreed as far as it goes, but I'm not sure this is a useful definition.
Is PiT
Just to note, I dislike Epiphany's removal of File -> Quit. They didn't seem
to think through the case where one would want to close the browser, and the
open it again, with the same tabs open - which current file->quit
accomplishes.
___
Usability mailing
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 22:12 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Agreed except for the last two.
>
> For "Save", it shouldn't be a requirement of HIG compliance that an
> application requires users to understand the distinction between RAM
> and disk (an increasingly irrelevant distinction as
