Re: [Usability] FW: UI Responsiveness

2007-11-30 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
On Dec 1, 2007, at 1:56 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > ... >> On 29 Nov 2007, at 22:58, Martin Harris wrote: >> ... >>> Also, has there been any talk about making UIs accountable for real- >>> time responsiveness (low-latency interactivity)? Is there anything >>> in the overall system that could

Re: [Usability] FW: UI Responsiveness

2007-11-30 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Calum Benson wrote: > > On 29 Nov 2007, at 22:58, Martin Harris wrote: > ... >> Also, has there been any talk about making UIs accountable for real- >> time responsiveness (low-latency interactivity)? Is there anything >> in the overall system that could require a UI t

Re: [Usability] FW: UI Responsiveness

2007-11-29 Thread Martin Harris
artin Harris Cc: usability@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Usability] FW: UI Responsiveness On 29 Nov 2007, at 22:58, Martin Harris wrote: > Are there any time constraints on HIG in terms of responsiveness? > Yes, see http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/feedback- responsiveness.html

Re: [Usability] FW: UI Responsiveness

2007-11-29 Thread Calum Benson
On 29 Nov 2007, at 22:58, Martin Harris wrote: > Are there any time constraints on HIG in terms of responsiveness? > Yes, see http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/feedback- responsiveness.html.en for the guidelines here. > Also, has there been any talk about making UIs accountable for