[Usability] (no subject)

2009-04-22 Thread Anton Kerezov
Btw you may need to switch to View > Listview because the data get's too much for online viewing and the standard view may not be updated. If I expose too much info please let me know and I'll shut the access down. Anton ___ Usability mailing list

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-12-13 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 12/13/05, Josue Farde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been looking into gnome and as i already said i do believe in the > concept of being simple, althoug gnome does need a lot of other > important things i have to say that to make it more friendly and > aceptable to everybody there is a need

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-12-13 Thread Joachim Noreiko
--- Josue Farde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > to make it more > friendly and > aceptable to everybody there is a need to change the > graphics. They look > old and 'taky', for the user to have a better > feelling when using gnome, > gnome needs to to heve a more modern look. To be usable, control

[Usability] (no subject)

2005-12-13 Thread Josue Farde
I've been looking into gnome and as i already said i do believe in the concept of being simple, althoug gnome does need a lot of other important things i have to say that to make it more friendly and aceptable to everybody there is a need to change the graphics. They look old and 'taky', for the us

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-19 Thread Owen Williams
>From the way macintosh power users talk about quicksilver, it sounds like an application we should think about cloning. As I understand it, it's a graphical application that functions much like a command line with pipes, but for rich data. owen On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 21:49 -0300, Matthew Thomas

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-16 Thread Matthew Thomas
On 16 Sep, 2005, at 8:38 PM, Jono Bacon wrote: ... - saying that, I understand that many people (including me) still like to use the command line, and running it on the background seems perfectly (albeit flawed in usability terms* fine). Running a gDesklet would solve this problem. ... One solut

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-16 Thread Matthew Thomas
On 16 Sep, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Maurizio Colucci wrote: command line on a regular basis. I firmly believe a Desktop has failed if you need to use the command line for ordinary use. Many times a day, I need to go to the terminal to issue the command cuebreakpoints X.cue | shnsplit -n '' -o fl

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-16 Thread Jono Bacon
Heya, I think this is an interesting idea, but I think it is best placed in a gDesklet. This is because of a few reasons: - using the command line is really something that GNOME should be trying to move Linux users away from. If you are bored one day, try and do *everything* with the GUI. You wi

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-16 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:21:51 +0100 > From: Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Maurizio Colucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, usability@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Usability] (no subj

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 00:04 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: > On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Maurizio Colucci wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:12:02 +0200 > > From: Maurizio Colucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: usability@gnome.org > > Subject: Re: [Usability] (no subject)

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-16 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Maurizio Colucci wrote: > Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:12:02 +0200 > From: Maurizio Colucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: usability@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Usability] (no subject) > > > command line on a regular basis. I firmly believe a Desktop has fa

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-16 Thread Maurizio Colucci
> command line on a regular basis. I firmly believe a Desktop has failed if > you need to use the command line for ordinary use. Many times a day, I need to go to the terminal to issue the command cuebreakpoints X.cue | shnsplit -n '' -o flac Y.ape Does this mean the Gnome desktop has fail

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-16 Thread Stefan Kost
Hi Hynek, I was doing exactly that in gnome-1.X. With enlightenment I could: * turn off the border * make the app sticky and * send it to the background I run a root-session in this background terminal and could easily do things there. When starting gtk2-apps one can pass some options like wind

Re: [Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-15 Thread Alan Horkan
some effort has been made to answer their own question. My response follows below, interspersed through your message. On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Hynek Hanke wrote: > Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:07:01 +0200 > From: Hynek Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: usability@gnome.org > Subject: [Usab

[Usability] (no subject)

2005-09-15 Thread Hynek Hanke
Hello all, for me, the classical ``background'' of my Gnome desktop (some inactive image + a few icons on top of it) is something quite old and not really working well in how I use computers today. In their present form , I don't use desktop icons at all. But I have no idea about better solutions