On 6 November 2012 08:43, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
> We are in a situation where even the code base (GTK/GNOME) is more
> different as the time goes on. Ubuntu is not either using the new
> Nautilus. They completly ignored Gnome Online Account to implement
> Ubuntu Online Account etc... this is g
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:43 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
> What I cannot understand is how they're going to use Unity on tablet.
> Unity makes no sense on tablet, or better: the UI does, but the rest
> don't.
>
The top bar isn't tablet friendly, it needs to be redesigned to be used in
tablets.
Bu
On 11/06/2012 03:43 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
> They completly ignored Gnome Online Account to implement
> Ubuntu Online Account etc... this is going to the direction where
> Unity will be completly different from Gnome/GTK codebase someday.
I need to correct this: it's the other way round: be
On 11/06/2012 03:02 AM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 11/06/2012 04:39 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
With that we're going to have to change over all the default apps in order to
maintain the user experience. Or we're going to require vast improvements in the
integration of Gtk+ apps in KDE. Either way
On 06/11/2012 16:02, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 04:39 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> If we are to switch the default desktop to a Qt based one, we're going to be
>> shifting Unity's roots from GNOME to KDE, and the Ubuntu default desktop
>> environment itself from GNOME to KDE.
>
> Why?
On 11/06/2012 04:39 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> If we are to switch the default desktop to a Qt based one, we're going to be
> shifting Unity's roots from GNOME to KDE, and the Ubuntu default desktop
> environment itself from GNOME to KDE.
Why? One would just need to have Qt bindings for all the l
On 06/11/2012 11:08, Britt Yazel wrote:
> Both toolkits are on the disk right now aren't they? considering ubuntuone is
> a
> qt application nowor is qt installed at the time of running the ubuntuone
> installer
Hmm, yes I guess it is. apt-cache depends ubuntu-desktop shows qt-at-spi which
br
On 06/11/2012 01:13, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5 November 2012 17:18, supernova wrote:
>> Hi to all, I found this video on the web:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEXk-ClMO-8
>> and following it i was able to build a desktop KDE really similar to Ubuntu
>> Unity.
>> I was wanderin
Hi,
On 5 November 2012 17:18, supernova wrote:
> Hi to all, I found this video on the web:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEXk-ClMO-8
> and following it i was able to build a desktop KDE really similar to Ubuntu
> Unity.
> I was wandering about future development of gnomeshell, which is quite
>
Hi to all, I found this video on the web:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEXk-ClMO-8
and following it i was able to build a desktop KDE really similar to Ubuntu
Unity.
I was wandering about future development of gnomeshell, which is quite
alchemic and esoteric.
So I think that considering a switch
10 matches
Mail list logo