I don't recall the explicit release why it didn't make it in the
repositories this release, but the basically it lacked testing this release
and also the consensus switch to more "simple" apps like MyUnity to
customize Unity. But do read the archive of the Ubuntu Power Users [1].
With metta, Chris
IMHO, it should be added to the repositories. Many users like to use Ubuntu
Tweak.
Sent from my iPod
On May 1, 2012, at 1:00 PM, supernova wrote:
> 2012/5/1 Chris Druif :
>> I know Ubuntu Tweak can be used clean up a system. It had been opted to be
>> used by "power users".
> it is not in the
2012/5/1 Chris Druif :
> I know Ubuntu Tweak can be used clean up a system. It had been opted to be
> used by "power users".
it is not in the repositories
Supernova
> I don't know of other solutions, but it would be a good idea to think of
> what the janitor *should* do, either by looking up old de
I know Ubuntu Tweak can be used clean up a system. It had been opted to be
used by "power users".
I don't know of other solutions, but it would be a good idea to think of
what the janitor *should* do, either by looking up old designs or thinking
out a proper design what it should do.
With metta,
Many say that computer janitor is bad.
Is there a substitute or should we Felipe something better?
Supernova
Il giorno martedì 1 maggio 2012, Chris Druif ha
scritto:
> I don't know how janitor works in the background but I do have a terminal
command laying about that can be safely used to automat
I don't know how janitor works in the background but I do have a terminal
command laying about that can be safely used to automatically used to
remove old-kernels. Just say if it would make your life easier.
With metta, Chris
On May 1, 2012 2:17 PM, "supernova" wrote:
> I'm trying computer janit
I'm trying computer janitor on precise: it has a problem because wanted to
uninstall packages from leksmark that manage printer/fax.
remains the necessity to clean cache and old kernels.
Supernova
> Sent from my iPod
> On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Chris Druif wrote:
>
> If I look at precise:
> p
I agree.
In Christ,
Ryan
Sent from my iPod
On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Chris Druif wrote:
> If I look at precise:
> packages.ubuntu.com/precise/linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic
> packages.ubuntu.com/precise/linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic-pae
> Which gives all the installed sizes of the generic ker
I agree. Good thinking!
In Christ,
Ryan
Sent from my iPod
On Apr 29, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Ian Santopietro wrote:
> Quite frankly, the kernel packages accumulating throughout a cycle don't
> really take up a significant portion of storage. I don't think its worth the
> risk of causing OS damage
If I look at precise:
packages.ubuntu.com/precise/linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic
packages.ubuntu.com/precise/linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic-pae
Which gives all the installed sizes of the generic kernel. All are in
excess of 100 MB, with amd64 topping the list at around 130 MB.
It is something trivial
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Ian Santopietro wrote:
> Quite frankly, the kernel packages accumulating throughout a cycle don't
> really take up a significant portion of storage. I don't think its worth
> the risk of causing OS damage just to clear out a few MB of disk space.
Aren't they up
That's a good point, but most users running under such constraints are
advanced enough to be able to remove old kerenls manually.
On Apr 29, 2012 10:34 AM, "Colin Law" wrote:
> On 29 April 2012 17:28, Ian Santopietro wrote:
> > Quite frankly, the kernel packages accumulating throughout a cycle d
On 29 April 2012 17:28, Ian Santopietro wrote:
> Quite frankly, the kernel packages accumulating throughout a cycle don't
> really take up a significant portion of storage. I don't think its worth the
> risk of causing OS damage just to clear out a few MB of disk space.
That rather depends on you
Quite frankly, the kernel packages accumulating throughout a cycle don't
really take up a significant portion of storage. I don't think its worth
the risk of causing OS damage just to clear out a few MB of disk space.
On Apr 29, 2012 9:57 AM, "Chris Druif" wrote:
> I wish I could believe that, bu
I wish I could believe that, but still:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KernelPanic
This could happen after updating to a newer kernel. That's why I asked
about it.
With metta, Chris
On Apr 29, 2012 5:01 PM, "supernova" wrote:
>
> I think that the new kernel has already been tested, so it's wo
I think that the new kernel has already been tested, so it's working
Supernova
Il giorno domenica 29 aprile 2012, Chris ha scritto:
> An additional note on this: would it br possible to make some kind of
background test of the kernel on any users system? That would confirm the
installed kernel is
An additional note on this: would it br possible to make some kind of
background test of the kernel on any users system? That would confirm the
installed kernel is working as it should be and only let that one remain?
Just a thought thou, keep us informed how it is going.
With metta, Chris
On Apr
I'm not an expert but if somebody would help me I could implement and
experiment this feature.
Supernova
Il giorno sabato 28 aprile 2012, supernova ha
scritto:
>
>
> Il giorno sabato 28 aprile 2012, Aditya Vaidya ha
scritto:
>> CCSM is _NOT_ the place for Janitor to be. If anywhere, it is to be
Il giorno sabato 28 aprile 2012, Aditya Vaidya ha
scritto:
> CCSM is _NOT_ the place for Janitor to be. If anywhere, it is to be in
System Settings (that dashboard-like thingy)
>
Ok. It could be a good idea.
Supernova
> Sincerely,
> Kroq-gar78
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:07 AM, supernova wrot
I agree with this last state, if it can't be automated. It is similar to
"Privacy" that it's a setting in my eyes to "keep" a certain amount of
kernels. I'd go for only the current and the most recent second one, but
further investigation in automating this process should be done.
With metta, Chri
CCSM is _NOT_ the place for Janitor to be. If anywhere, it is to be in
System Settings (that dashboard-like thingy)
Sincerely,
Kroq-gar78
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:07 AM, supernova wrote:
> So we could for example:
> Adapt computer janitor to Ubuntu exigencies, put it as default in the os,
>
So we could for example:
Adapt computer janitor to Ubuntu exigencies, put it as default in the os,
place a button in ccsm, any other configuration tool to switch between
newbie or Skilled? Default is newbie, of course...
Supernova
Il giorno sabato 28 aprile 2012, Ryan Gauger ha scritto:
> Not a p
Not a problem, I was just a little confused a little. :) Have a great weekend!!!
In Christ,
Ryan
Sent from my iPod
On Apr 27, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Aditya Vaidya wrote:
> Yes sorry, 11.10
>
> Sincerely,
> Kroq-gar78
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ryan Gauger wrote:
> ...It was removed
Yes sorry, 11.10
Sincerely,
Kroq-gar78
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ryan Gauger wrote:
> ...It was removed from the Oneiric CD wasn't it? At least I thought it
> was... Thanks!
>
> In Christ,
> Ryan
>
> Sent from my iPod
>
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 8:16 PM, Aditya Vaidya wrote:
>
> 'computer-
...It was removed from the Oneiric CD wasn't it? At least I thought it was...
Thanks!
In Christ,
Ryan
Sent from my iPod
On Apr 27, 2012, at 8:16 PM, Aditya Vaidya wrote:
> 'computer-janitor' was removed from the 12.04 CD because it messed up a lot
> of stuff, like removing flash... or someth
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Michele Giacomoli
wrote:
> It seems the description of the computer-janitor, but in Ubuntu 12.04 it's
> not installed in the system. I know i can install it running sudo apt-get
> install computer-janitor, but a newbie doesn't know that. Moreover a newbie
> doesn't
'computer-janitor' was removed from the 12.04 CD because it messed up a lot
of stuff, like removing flash... or something along those lines.
Sincerely,
Kroq-gar78
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Michele Giacomoli <
michele.giacom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems the description of the computer
It seems the description of the computer-janitor, but in Ubuntu 12.04 it's
not installed in the system. I know i can install it running sudo apt-get
install computer-janitor, but a newbie doesn't know that. Moreover a newbie
doesn't think he has to clean his pc, so the application should clean the
In addition to that, it isn't really something that normal users should
need to concern themselves with.
On Apr 27, 2012 4:23 PM, "Daniel Hollocher"
wrote:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CleanupCruft
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM, supernova
> wrote:
> > Maybe this is not the right place for th
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CleanupCruft
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM, supernova wrote:
> Maybe this is not the right place for this discussion, anyway I want
> to think about one thing: when the kernel package upgrades, a new one
> in installed beside the old. I then remove the old one and keep
Maybe this is not the right place for this discussion, anyway I want
to think about one thing: when the kernel package upgrades, a new one
in installed beside the old. I then remove the old one and keep only
the new one. This can be done with synaptic or through line commands,
but not with Ubuntu S
31 matches
Mail list logo
