Alan, instead of a patch can you create a merge request to the compiz
plugins package itself? May you can ask Daniel van Vugt and San Spilsbury
to take a look at the three bug reports. I guess they are currently busy
with other critical bug reports lately.
Nekhelesh
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:04
On 17/04/12 22:50, Alan Bell wrote:
it also matters whether the animation frames are synced to the
vertical blanking timings. One thing you can do to make quite a few
compiz related things smoother is to turn the mouse position polling
down to 1 (or anything less than about 15) this will mean t
it also matters whether the animation frames are synced to the vertical
blanking timings. One thing you can do to make quite a few compiz
related things smoother is to turn the mouse position polling down to 1
(or anything less than about 15) this will mean that panning around a
zoomed desktop
Hi Ryan, thanks a lot for bringing this up. I agree that animations in many
cases could be smoother, is not just a matter of frame rate but at first of
easing (and consequentially of duration). We are currently looking into
that keeping as priority consistency.
Best, chr
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at
a lower frame rate could cause some choppy looking animations.
slowing it down would always make it look smoother. if you slow it down you
cause the animation to have more frames inserted between the normal ones.
unless you get those extra frames of animation in the normal time frame
it's always go
In the newest version of Unity that was uploaded to the servers yesterday, the
icon flying animation from Ubuntu Software Centre is too fast also. Webupd8
also thinks that animation is overly fast. If the user blinks, the animation
has already finished. Just my two cents. Thanks, and enjoy the w
I tend to agree in part. The animations are overly fast in my opinion and
don't look too good because of it, especially when compared to the likes of
KDE with it's buttery animations.
If animations are going to be so fast they look choppy then doesn't it
make them pointless in the first place?
I
On 04/13/2012 03:30 PM, Colin Law wrote:
On 13 April 2012 20:14, Ryan Gauger wrote:
On 04/13/2012 11:50 AM, Conscious User wrote:
I was wondering - why are the animations in Ubuntu not nearly as smooth
as Mac OS X - or even Windows? Take a look at the workspace switcher -
it is not nearly as
On 13 April 2012 20:14, Ryan Gauger wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 11:50 AM, Conscious User wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I was wondering - why are the animations in Ubuntu not nearly as smooth
>>> as Mac OS X - or even Windows? Take a look at the workspace switcher -
>>> it is not nearly as smooth as it would be if i
I'm not seeing that at all. It's perfectly smooth here. They're
faster, which I guess could make it seem like we're trying to hide
choppiness, but if you slow them down, you'll see it's perfectly
smooth.
I'm against slowing down the animation. It's perfectly smooth as it
is, and slowing it down co
On 04/13/2012 11:50 AM, Conscious User wrote:
I was wondering - why are the animations in Ubuntu not nearly as smooth
as Mac OS X - or even Windows? Take a look at the workspace switcher -
it is not nearly as smooth as it would be if it were in Windows. There
is no reason for this is there? Har
I was wondering - why are the animations in Ubuntu not nearly as smooth
as Mac OS X - or even Windows? Take a look at the workspace switcher -
it is not nearly as smooth as it would be if it were in Windows. There
is no reason for this is there? Hardware should not be a problem, since
Windows 7
Team,
I was wondering - why are the animations in Ubuntu not nearly as smooth
as Mac OS X - or even Windows? Take a look at the workspace switcher -
it is not nearly as smooth as it would be if it were in Windows. There
is no reason for this is there? Hardware should not be a problem, since
W
13 matches
Mail list logo
