I believe what I'm about to say have been said more than a thousand times
before, but still, I feel like adding some weight. Rather than adress this
"remove sort button" proposal (considering it is not a troll); I'd like
make a stance against this reductionist mentality. The more a software can
do,
ks!
Mathieu
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Arthur Tan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Mathieu Beliveau
> wrote:
> >
> > Just to know, now that we've reached a small consensus on the issue; what
> > would the next step be? Isn't there some offici
Just to know, now that we've reached a small consensus on the issue; what
would the next step be? Isn't there some official specification for the
dash against which this proposal could be submitted for review and
approval? (I'm kinda puzzled on the impact the discussions on this list can
have on th
Agreed. As I've said before, it seems (as Arthur Tan pointed out) that the
main reason the "see more result" button is at the top, is for the use case
where upon some search entry, what you are looking for isn't amongst the
first row of results and so, to complete your entry, you'd wish to expand
t
Hi! First of all, my apologies for the previous mail sent to each and
every list member, individually.
As there was some confusion about the proposals I've submitted and
that they were not exactly up-to-date with the current specification,
you'll find in the following link a very graphical summary
5 matches
Mail list logo
