[Unity-design] Tablet stuff (was: possibility to use QT)

2012-11-06 Thread Henri Sundelin
On 6.11.12 16:04 , Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:43 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com > wrote: What I cannot understand is how they're going to use Unity on tablet. Unity makes no sense on tablet, or better: the UI do

Re: [Unity-design] possibility to use QT

2012-11-06 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On 6 November 2012 08:43, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: > We are in a situation where even the code base (GTK/GNOME) is more > different as the time goes on. Ubuntu is not either using the new > Nautilus. They completly ignored Gnome Online Account to implement > Ubuntu Online Account etc... this is g

Re: [Unity-design] possibility to use QT

2012-11-06 Thread Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:43 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: > What I cannot understand is how they're going to use Unity on tablet. > Unity makes no sense on tablet, or better: the UI does, but the rest > don't. > The top bar isn't tablet friendly, it needs to be redesigned to be used in tablets. Bu

Re: [Unity-design] possibility to use QT

2012-11-06 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 11/06/2012 03:43 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: > They completly ignored Gnome Online Account to implement > Ubuntu Online Account etc... this is going to the direction where > Unity will be completly different from Gnome/GTK codebase someday. I need to correct this: it's the other way round: be

Re: [Unity-design] possibility to use QT

2012-11-06 Thread Brandon Watkins
On 11/06/2012 03:02 AM, Alberto Mardegan wrote: On 11/06/2012 04:39 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote: With that we're going to have to change over all the default apps in order to maintain the user experience. Or we're going to require vast improvements in the integration of Gtk+ apps in KDE. Either way

[Unity-design] [Merge] lp:~nick-dedekind/unity/lp893140.launcher-icon-feedback into lp:unity

2012-11-06 Thread Nick Dedekind
You have been requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~nick-dedekind/unity/lp893140.launcher-icon-feedback into lp:unity. For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~nick-dedekind/unity/lp893140.launcher-icon-feedback/+merge/131576 Inverted launcher icon blink/pulse on application st

[Unity-design] [Merge] lp:~nick-dedekind/unity/lp893140.launcher-icon-feedback into lp:unity

2012-11-06 Thread Nick Dedekind
Nick Dedekind has proposed merging lp:~nick-dedekind/unity/lp893140.launcher-icon-feedback into lp:unity. Commit message: Inverted launcher icon blink/pulse on application start for immediate feedback. (LP: #893140) Requested reviews: Ayatana Discussion (unity-design) Unity Team (unity-team

Re: [Unity-design] [Merge] lp:~nick-dedekind/unity/lp893140.launcher-icon-feedback into lp:unity

2012-11-06 Thread Nick Dedekind
Transition: http://ubuntuone.com/1k07OmG8oVHj7nquAXa4eJ Unfortunately you can't actually see when the mouse is clicked to activate the application, but you will have to trust that it's at the point of the start of the icon background inversion. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nick-dedekind/unity

Re: [Unity-design] possibility to use QT

2012-11-06 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On 06/11/2012 16:02, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > On 11/06/2012 04:39 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote: >> If we are to switch the default desktop to a Qt based one, we're going to be >> shifting Unity's roots from GNOME to KDE, and the Ubuntu default desktop >> environment itself from GNOME to KDE. > > Why?

Re: [Unity-design] possibility to use QT

2012-11-06 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 11/06/2012 04:39 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > If we are to switch the default desktop to a Qt based one, we're going to be > shifting Unity's roots from GNOME to KDE, and the Ubuntu default desktop > environment itself from GNOME to KDE. Why? One would just need to have Qt bindings for all the l