Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_1620#Invalid_character)
describes the "invalid character" symbol (see attachment) as a Cyrillic Ж
which it obviously is not.
But what is it? Does it deserve encoding, or is it a glyph variation of an
existing codepoint?
The question is somewhat prompte
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Magnus Bodin ☀ wrote:
> It's like if IBM invented the tofu of some sort.
>
Right. The question is, can it be considered a glyph variation of U+?
On a tangent: graphically, the closest glyph which is not a letter appears
to be
🝏 U+1F74F Alchemical Symbol fo
have one sitting around.
>
> --Ken
>
>
>
> On 9/25/2017 9:48 PM, Leo Broukhis via Unicode wrote:
>
>> Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_1620#Invalid_character)
>> describes the "invalid character" symbol (see attachment) as a Cyrillic Ж
>> wh
id character symbol".
> - Karl
>
> --
> Am Dienstag, 26. September 2017 um 06:48 schrieb Leo Broukhis via Unicode:
>
> >> Wikipedia
> >> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_1620#Invalid_character)
> >> describes the "invalid character" symbol (see
Ken,
The next time I'm at the Mountain View CHM, I'll try to ask. However,
assuming it was an overstrike of an X and an I, then where does the
"Eris"-like glyph come from? Was there ever an IBM font with a
double-semicircular X like )( ?
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Ken Whistler wrote:
> L
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:35 AM, William_J_G Overington via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
>
> I decided that trying to design emoji for 'I' and for 'You' seemed
> interesting so I decided to have a go at designing some.
>
Why don't we just encode Blissymbolics, where pronouns are already
6 matches
Mail list logo
