On 2017/06/02 04:54, Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote:
Richard Wordingham wrote:
even supporting 6-byte patterns just in case 20.1 bits eventually turn
out not to be enough,
Sorry to be late with this, but if 20.1 bits turn out to not be enough,
what about 21 bits?
That would still limit UTF-8
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:13 PM Martin J. Dürst via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> Sorry to be late with this, but if 20.1 bits turn out to not be enough,
> what about 21 bits?
>
> That would still limit UTF-8 to four bytes, but would almost double the
> code space. Assuming (conservativel
2 matches
Mail list logo
