Andrew West 於 2011年10月20日 上午3:25 寫道:
> On 19 October 2011 18:41, John H. Jenkins wrote:
>>
>> U+613F kDefinition (variant/simplification of U+9858 願) desire, want, wish;
>> (archaic) prudent, cautious
>> U+613F kSemanticVariant U+9858> U+613F kSpecializedSemanticVariant U+9858> U+613F kTraditi
On 19 October 2011 18:41, John H. Jenkins wrote:
>
> U+613F kDefinition (variant/simplification of U+9858 願) desire, want, wish;
> (archaic) prudent, cautious
> U+613F kSemanticVariant U+9858 U+613F kSpecializedSemanticVariant U+9858 U+613F kTraditionalVariant U+613F U+9858
> U+613F kSimplifiedVa
Andrew West 於 2011年10月19日 上午4:14 寫道:
> On 19 October 2011 10:43, shi zhao wrote:
>> The page said kTraditionalVariant of U+2B5B8 is U+9858 願.
>
> which is correct.
>
>> ) said U+2B5B8 𫖸 is kSimplifiedVariant of U+9858 願, U+613F 愿 is
>> kSemanticVariant, but 愿 is simplified of 願, not U+2B5B8 𫖸.
Jukka K. Korpela 於 2011年10月19日 上午3:06 寫道:
> I don’t know what issue Shi Zhao is referring to, but there is definitively
> an error on the page. Under the heading “Glyphs,” the small table contains,
> under the header cell “The Unicode Standard”, a cell that appears to be
> empty.
This is a k
On 19 October 2011 10:43, shi zhao wrote:
> The page said kTraditionalVariant of U+2B5B8 is U+9858 願.
which is correct.
> ) said U+2B5B8 𫖸 is kSimplifiedVariant of U+9858 願, U+613F 愿 is
> kSemanticVariant, but 愿 is simplified of 願, not U+2B5B8 𫖸.
which I agree is not correct. It's not always c
The page said kTraditionalVariant of U+2B5B8 is U+9858 願.
On U+9858 願
(http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=9858&useutf8=false
) said U+2B5B8 𫖸 is kSimplifiedVariant of U+9858 願, U+613F 愿 is
kSemanticVariant, but 愿 is simplified of 願, not U+2B5B8 𫖸.
2011/10/19 Jukka K. Korp
19.10.2011 11:35, Andrew West wrote:
On 19 October 2011 02:38, shi zhao wrote:
Unihan data for U+2B5B8 error?
see
http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=2b5b8&useutf8=false
Anything in particular we are meant to be looking at?
I don’t know what issue Shi Zhao is referr
On 19 October 2011 02:38, shi zhao wrote:
> Unihan data for U+2B5B8 error?
> see http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=2b5b8&useutf8=false
Anything in particular we are meant to be looking at?
Andrew
8 matches
Mail list logo