An issue that seems to be coming into prominence is that as a result of the
requirement that emoji proposals should not be overly specific, some recent
proposals seem to be trying to emphasise that they are not overly specific by
suggesting that the particular emoji proposed could mean various t
William_J_G Overington:
>
> http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2017/17192-response-cmts.pdf
> http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2017/17147-emoji-subcommittee.pdf
>
>> Two key issues are whether the characters are likely to be popular
>> and whether they would be supported by major vendors.
>
> I am rather con
2 matches
Mail list logo
