Re: Alternative encodings for Malayalam “nta”

> > Oh the Core Spec’s 5.0 -> 5.1 delta is presented on the webpage itself, > but not incorporated into the PDF: > > https://unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.1.0/#Malayalam_Chillu_Characters > > Thanks for pointing this out. 🙏 I had missed it. > Here is the difference between our approaches. You pr

Re: Alternative encodings for Malayalam “nta”

> On Oct 9, 2019, at 00:04, Cibu wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:05 PM 梁海 Liang Hai > wrote: > >> Prior to Unicode 5.2, the encoding of the cluster [glyph] (<> subscript RRA>> /ntʌ/) was not clearly defined. … > > You mean 5.1, right? The encoding has been specif

Re: Alternative encodings for Malayalam “nta”

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:05 PM 梁海 Liang Hai wrote: > > Prior to Unicode 5.2, the encoding of the cluster [glyph] (< N, subscript RRA>> /ntʌ/) was not clearly defined. … > > > You mean 5.1, right? The encoding has been specified since 5.1. > I couldn't get the text for 5.1 from https://www.unicod

Re: Alternative encodings for Malayalam “nta”

[Putting the public mailing list back to the recipient list.] Cibu, Thanks for your L2/19-348 (Response to L2/19-345). My comments: > I am curious to know the reference for the phonetic analysis described in > section ​A chillu-l

Re: Alternative encodings for Malayalam “nta”

Yes; it is now available as L2/19-348 . On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 11:03 PM Asmus Freytag (c) wrote: > Have you submitted that response as a UTC document? > A./ > > On 10/6/2019 2:08 PM, Cibu wrote: > > Thanks for addressing this. Here is

Re: Alternative encodings for Malayalam “nta”

On 10/6/2019 11:57 AM, 梁海 Liang Hai wrote: Folks, (Microsoft Peter and Andrew, search for “Windows” in the document.) (Asmus, in the document there’s a section 5, /ICANN RZ-LGR situation/—let me know if there’s some news.) The issue, as it affects domain names, has been brought to the author

Re: Alternative encodings for Malayalam “nta”

Have you submitted that response as a UTC document? A./ On 10/6/2019 2:08 PM, Cibu wrote: Thanks for addressing this. Here is my response: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K6L82VRmCGc9Fb4AOitNk4MT7Nu4V8aKUJo_1mW5X1o/ In summary, my take is: The sequence for ൻ്റ (<>) should not be legitim

Re: Alternative encodings for Malayalam “nta”

Thanks for addressing this. Here is my response: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K6L82VRmCGc9Fb4AOitNk4MT7Nu4V8aKUJo_1mW5X1o/ In summary, my take is: The sequence for ൻ്റ (<>) should not be legitimized as an alternate encoding; but should be recognized as a prevailing non-standard legacy enc