On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 16:37:48 +0100
Andrew West via Unicode wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 15:46, Richard Wordingham via Unicode
> wrote:
> > Does vowel above before vowel below yield a dotted circle?
>
> Yes. Attached are screenshots for two real world examples, one which
> is logically spe
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 15:46, Richard Wordingham via Unicode
wrote:
>
> > Just retested on Windows 10 with
> > a Tibetan font that supports both sequences of vowels, and both
> > sequences display correctly under Harfbuzz (as expected), but only
> > vowel-below followed by vowel-above displays cor
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 11:22:01 +0100
Andrew West via Unicode wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 08:29, Richard Wordingham via Unicode
> wrote:
> >
> > There are similar issues with Tibetan; some fonts do not work
> > properly if a vowel below (ccc=132) is separated from the base of
> > the consonant
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 08:29, Richard Wordingham via Unicode
wrote:
>
> There are similar issues with Tibetan; some fonts do not work properly
> if a vowel below (ccc=132) is separated from the base of the
> consonant stack by a vowel above (ccc=130).
It's not that the fonts don't work, it's that
I've spun this question off from the issue of what the USE is to do when
confronted with the NFC canonical equivalent of a string it will accept
when this equivalent does not match its regular expressions when they
are applied to strings of characters rather than canonical equivalence
classes of st
5 matches
Mail list logo
