[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1770742] Re: Cannot find -lGL

2018-06-29 Thread Scott Talbert
@Timo - it isn't completely clear, but it sounds like the original reporter had libglvnd-dev installed. My suspicion on this is that the proprietary driver wiped out the link somehow, but I couldn't reproduce that when I tried. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1770742] Re: Cannot find -lGL

2018-06-19 Thread Scott Talbert
Do you have the proprietary nvidia driver installed by chance? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libglvnd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770742 Title: Cannot find -lGL To manage notifications about this bug go to: h

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 887390] Re: GPU Lockups with Unity 3D & Nouveau on Oneiric with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430

2012-05-05 Thread Scott Talbert
Maybe, maybe not. It looks like we have different video hardware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-nouveau in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887390 Title: GPU Lockups with Unity 3D & Nouveau on Oneir

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 855124] Re: XRANDR operations very slow unless (phantom) HDMI1 disabled

2012-03-02 Thread Scott Talbert
Leann, the kernel mentioned in comment #71 seems to perform about the same as the drm-next one. xrandr operations take about 170ms on my hardware. So it would seem you have successfully applied the patch. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is s

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 855124] Re: XRANDR operations very slow unless (phantom) HDMI1 disabled

2012-03-02 Thread Scott Talbert
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Leann Ogasawara wrote: > I'd really like to get this fix applied before Beta-2 for Precise. If I > could just get test confirmation with the kernel from comment #71, that > would be great. Thanks. Leann, I'll try to test it this weekend. -- You received this bug notificat

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 855124] Re: XRANDR operations very slow unless (phantom) HDMI1 disabled

2012-02-26 Thread Scott Talbert
For me, under kernel 3.0.0-16-generic, running xrandr takes ~1.4 seconds and it appears to stall my system while running. With 3.3.0-996-generic #201202170408 from the drm-next area above, running xrandr takes ~170ms and doesn't cause my system to stall (at least noticeably). So for me, it appear

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 887390] Re: GPU Lockups with Unity 3D & Nouveau on Oneiric with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430

2011-11-07 Thread Scott Talbert
** Attachment added: "Xorg.1.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887390/+attachment/2588999/+files/Xorg.1.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-nouveau in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887390 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 887390] [NEW] GPU Lockups with Unity 3D & Nouveau on Oneiric with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430

2011-11-07 Thread Scott Talbert
Public bug reported: I believe I am seeing GPU lockups when running Unity 3D on Oneiric with the Nouveau driver using a GeForce 6150SE nForce 430. I'm not entirely sure what causes them, but I can usually make them occur by repeatedly minimizing and maximizing windows, showing/hiding the Unity pa

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 851526] Re: 3D no longer works after latest updates

2011-11-06 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, WarriorIng64 wrote: > I have not been running Unity 3D for the past week or so (switched over > to GNOME Shell on my desktop), but when I last used it everything seemed > fine performance-wise except the lenses being just slightly slow and the > Alt+Tab window switcher performi

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 851526] Re: 3D no longer works after latest updates

2011-11-06 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi WarriorIng64, Is Unity 3D still running well for you with Oneiric on your system? The reason I ask is that I have the same video card and a similar motherboard, but Unity 3D is performing poorly for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subs

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 544496] Re: [RS100] desktop became slow after upgrading to Lucid

2011-01-10 Thread Scott Talbert
My card uses 64MB of RAM also. The driver disables EXA pixmaps if the video RAM is 32MB or less. I'm wondering if this should be changed to 64MB or possibly more. Can anyone else confirm whether or not disabling EXA pixmaps helps their performance? -- You received this bug notification because

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 544496] Re: [RS100] desktop became slow after upgrading to Lucid

2011-01-09 Thread Scott Talbert
Matej, How much video RAM does your card have? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544496 Title: [RS100] desktop became slow after upgrading to Lucid _

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 544496] Re: [RS100] desktop became slow after upgrading to Lucid

2011-01-04 Thread Scott Talbert
In Maverick (with KMS enabled), the main performance issue I still experience is slow scrolling in Firefox (especially when viewing pages like slashdot.org and yahoo.com). I found recently that if I disable EXA pixmaps (Option "EXAPixmaps" "off" in xorg.conf), my scrolling performance improves gre

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 544496] Re: [RS100] desktop became slow after upgrading to Lucid

2010-08-24 Thread Scott Talbert
For me, with the Maverick Alpha 3 live CD, things seem to be about the same, if not worse. The numbers below are measured with glxgears. Lucid w/ KMS: ~2500 frames in 5 seconds. Lucid w/o KMS: ~5500 frames in 5 seconds. Maverick w/ KMS: ~300 frames in 5 seconds. Maverick w/o KMS: ~5500 frames in 5

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 544496] Re: [RS100] desktop became slow after upgrading to Lucid

2010-06-06 Thread Scott Talbert
After upgrading to Lucid, video performance was noticeably slower (for example, when paging up and down in Firefox when viewing slashdot.org, there was noticeable lag). This is with compiz disabled. When I run with radeon.modeset=0, performance seems to be normal. I am wondering if I am experien

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 554296] Re: Fonts "chipped" with subpixel hinting enabled on NV46 (G72M Quadro NVS 110M, GeForce Go 7300)

2010-06-05 Thread Scott Talbert
This affects me too. No problems w/ proprietary nVidia driver. Switching to 'Best Shapes' seemed to resolve the problem for me. xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Installed: 1:0.0.15+git20100219+9b4118d-0ubuntu5 Candidate: 1:0.0.15+git20100219+9b4118d-0ubuntu5 Version table: *** 1:0.0.15+git20100

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 238741] Re: Xorg nv Driver uses wrong sync frequencies with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430

2009-11-25 Thread Scott Talbert
Yes, the patch would resolve the issue for the -nv driver. Not sure it is worth the effort though, since you're moving to -nouveau in Lucid. -- Xorg nv Driver uses wrong sync frequencies with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238741 You received this bug notification beca

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 238741] Re: Xorg nv Driver uses wrong sync frequencies with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430

2009-11-24 Thread Scott Talbert
This issue does not occur for me when using the nouveau driver in Karmic (it does, however, still occur when using the nv driver in Karmic). -- Xorg nv Driver uses wrong sync frequencies with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238741 You received this bug notification becau