[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 451523] Re: Intel x3100 enormous regression in ubuntu 9.10 beta

2009-11-29 Thread Chris D
I just ran Karmic on the system I had problems with, and it ran just fine. There is a little bit of sluggishness in some Compiz animations, mainly around events that involve mapping a window (open, unminimize, etc). Otherwise, it seems quite good. I have no idea how this is possible, the only thing

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 451523] Re: Intel x3100 enormous regression in ubuntu 9.10 beta

2009-11-27 Thread Chris D
What did you do to resolve the problem re. pulseaudio? -- Intel x3100 enormous regression in ubuntu 9.10 beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in ubuntu. ___

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 451523] Re: Intel x3100 enormous regression in ubuntu 9.10 beta

2009-11-09 Thread Chris D
gxlgears may well not be a good benchmark, but the performance HAS dropped significantly. Just compare 9.10 to 8.10, they are lightyears apart in responsiveness. I'm going to run the prescribed Phoronix benchmarks and report back here - it is unacceptable for this kind of performance issue to go ig

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 210905] Re: not push-to-talk - xevie problem

2009-07-07 Thread Chris D
Hah! Good luck. The alternative WAS the X Record extension, but that is now also broken! The only remaining method is reading events from the EvDev devices under /dev/input, but even this only works about 80% of the time. I'm getting pretty cynical about the Xorg developers attitude to accessible t