** Also affects: nvidia-drivers-ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nvidia-drivers-ubuntu
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 in Ubuntu.
https:
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185600
Title:
[Upstream] LibreOffice repeatedly freezes
The problem persists in LO 3.5 beta 2 in Ubuntu 11.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185600
Title:
[Upstream] LibreOffice repeatedly freezes after resumin
This bug appears to have been "fixed" by the installation of nvidia
290.10 driver, in my case by adding ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates to 11.10
sources. Note that this unsupported PPA may need to be reloaded in
Precise if Precise doesn't include 290.10 (or greater) as nvidia-
current.
** Changed in
[Expired for xorg-server (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
[Expired for xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-vi
Scroll-Lock indicator always shows correct layout
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36812
Title:
Keyboard layout change on hotkeys press instead of release and do not
work well wi
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-nouveau in Ubuntu.
https:
** Summary changed:
- Wrong keyboard layout switching order when using more than two layouts
+ Two issues with keyboard layout switching in Kubuntu 11.10
** Description changed:
- I'm using three keyboard layouts in Kubuntu 11.10 (but it also affects
Ubuntu, I checked it) that installed in foll
A little more on that error popup. It's from GoldenDict and tehy've been aware
of Record being broken for sometime now, although from 2009 (so this might not
be applicable or it might indicate a regression):
https://github.com/gennady/goldendict/commit/230ab47891283216d3abd43fbb66b8f27125ec1b
Th
** Also affects: kde-systemsettings (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xkeyboard-config in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890438
Title:
Two issues with keyboard layout
** Changed in: xkeyboard-config
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xkeyboard-config in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890438
Title:
Wrong keyboard layout switching order when using
I decided to fix two bugs with one commit:)
See bug #43922.
Now, alt_shift_toggle is one-directional, only "Next". And there is
alt_shift_toggle_bidir for people who need the old behavior.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xkeyboard-
config/commit/?id=de45ece5ab09ab218998d35db3a9d0cb4686b546
--
You r
> Since feature request for Unity developers is filled, many more peoples (than
> just Gnome Shell and KDE audience) may notice problems with keyboard layouts
> switching order in xkb in near future. So now it's time to fix this problem in
> XKB design. Don't you think so?
I think this may be a goo
(In reply to comment #14)
> Ok, if we agree that it must be fixed in GNOME - would that close the subtopic
> about mainstream DEs
Please read commentary 11. DE subtopic is not about fix some DE-related bug,
it's about current availability of this feature for target audience.
Availability of this
URL: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286150
** Changed in: kde-systemsettings (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #286150
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286150
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
I believe scrollLock LED is used from gnome(?) to indicate the alternative
layout.
At least this is how it works on me with the ubuntu xorg (without the patch
from ilya)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bu
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #660254
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660254
** Bug watch added: Gentoo Bugzilla #379827
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379827
** Bug watch added: Gentoo Bugzilla #304375
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304375
--
You rec
(In reply to comment #90)
> (In reply to comment #88)
> > (In reply to comment #86)
> > > Already proven to break the XKB specification, yes.
> > ...
>
> It is not in XKBproto but in XKBlib spec. You can see the only assertion
> against changing layout on release in general (and the patch in parti
Lots of CCs ... I'm gonna bring this into the tracker to see if there's
something we can eventually do about this in a way that won't break backwards
compatibility.
Daniel, do you have any thoughts about how this could be done by extending XKB
rather than breaking it?
--
You received this bug
(In reply to comment #93)
> Long ago a bug was opened for this issue.
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304375
>
And marked as "resolved upstream". Which is just not true, at least
according to the ebuilds. Havent taken a look at the code itself, but
can you currently point to any exis
Long ago a bug was opened for this issue.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304375
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:14 PM, wrote:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=865
>
> --- Comment #92 from youagree 2011-08-22 07:14:34 PDT
> ---
> For Gentoo and derivatives users, a working sol
For Gentoo and derivatives users, a working solution for patching is
described here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379827
Bug report description includes guidance for how an ebuild file for
automatic patching of XkbActions.c can be achieved, and an example
ebuild file that applies Ilya'
I would vote for this change as well.
I understand that it is not aligned with 13 years old standard and I am
sorry for that. Still I see changing group on press breaking much many
things than changing it on release. Maybe it is time to modify this
library specification, because there is a good re
(In reply to comment #88)
> (In reply to comment #86)
> > Already proven to break the XKB specification, yes.
>
> Hi Daniel. I've seen this comment about breaking the XKB specification in
> several places and - I'm really not trying to be contrary - I looked at the
> protocol specs here
> http://
(In reply to comment #87)
> Can we pay to speed up the fixing of this bug?
I second this motion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36812
Title:
Keyboard layout change on hotkeys pr
(In reply to comment #86)
> Already proven to break the XKB specification, yes.
Hi Daniel. I've seen this comment about breaking the XKB specification
in several places and - I'm really not trying to be contrary - I looked
at the protocol specs here
http://www.x.org/releases/current/doc/kbproto/xk
Can we pay to speed up the fixing of this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36812
Title:
Keyboard layout change on hotkeys press instead of release and do not
work well with
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:05:34AM -0700, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote:
> --- Comment #85 from kyak 2011-04-08 01:05:27 PDT ---
> (In reply to comment #84)
> > (In reply to comment #83)
> > > thanks. empty rhetoric is the greatest way of motivating developers. This
> > > bug
> > > just d
(In reply to comment #84)
> (In reply to comment #83)
> > thanks. empty rhetoric is the greatest way of motivating developers. This
> > bug
> > just dropped to the bottom of my priority list again.
>
> Peter, I'm terribly sorry for rending the air. Please, consider resolving this
> bug ASAP since
(In reply to comment #83)
> thanks. empty rhetoric is the greatest way of motivating developers. This bug
> just dropped to the bottom of my priority list again.
Peter, I'm terribly sorry for rending the air. Please, consider
resolving this bug ASAP since there are thousands of people affected by
(In reply to comment #82)
> I'm confused. This bug is now 7 years old and it's still not fixed? What year
> of desktop Linux are we talking about when basic things in Linux are largely
> broken?
thanks. empty rhetoric is the greatest way of motivating developers.
This bug just dropped to the botto
I'm confused. This bug is now 7 years old and it's still not fixed? What
year of desktop Linux are we talking about when basic things in Linux
are largely broken?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launch
(In reply to comment #80)
Ok, I try to answer here, but I should note that I don't remember full details
(because it was more than half a year ago).
> The following comments were made by Peter Hutterer (an X.org input developer)
> on the corresponding bug in RedHat bugzilla (
> https://bugzilla.r
The following comments were made by Peter Hutterer (an X.org input developer)
on the corresponding bug in RedHat bugzilla (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660254 ):
(In reply to comment #6)
> implementing this behaviour requires guesswork that I'm not sure is safe in a
> number of se
The patch has been applied in Ubuntu, just now.
Today is a good day. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36812
Title:
Keyboard layout change on hotkeys press instead of release and
(In reply to comment #75)
> Things to test would include
> 3. Is there any problem when using IBus? Check the shortcuts that
> activate/deactivate/switch layout in IBus.
Input methods may be a problem as i dont think anyone who is interested in this
is using IM. I dont know why - maybe IM users d
(In reply to comment #76)
> I guess most people are just satisfied with this patch, which, obviously,
> works
> great.
It does indeed, just look as the number of comments confirming it.
> Also, the "things to test would include" items look like the author hasn't
> even
> tested the patch, other
(In reply to comment #75)
> (In reply to comment #74)
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there an update on the status of this bug please?
> >
>
> My guess is that this bug is stuck at the point where the patch needs
> extensive
> and explicit testing.
>
> Some users tested this on their system, however they
(In reply to comment #74)
> Hi,
>
> Is there an update on the status of this bug please?
>
My guess is that this bug is stuck at the point where the patch needs
extensive and explicit testing.
Some users tested this on their system, however they should to come up
with a more rigorous descriptio
Hi,
Is there an update on the status of this bug please?
Kind Regards,
Dave Walker
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36812
Title:
Keyboard layout change on hotkeys press instead o
Just to confirm that Ilya's patch from comment 45 completely fixes the
problem without any noticeable side-effects. I'm running X11R7.5 under
FreeBSD 8.1
Daniel, could you review and eventually commit the patch? This bug is
quite annoying.
Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification becau
After Vasa's comment, I made some exploration of the scroll lock issue
and in both cases (patched X or unpatched X) the behavior is exactly the
same.
The led can be used to indicate the alternative layout (from gnome's
settings) and it works as advertised: it switches on/off as long as the
layout
After Vasa, comment I made some exploration of the scroll lock issue and
in both cases (patched X or unpatched X) the behavior is exactly the
same.
The led can be used to indicate the alternative layout (from gnome's
settings) and it works as advertised: it switches on/off as long as the
layout ch
(In reply to comment #67)
> Ilya, did you debug the problem with the led as you described in #64?
As for #64: I have used this gnome setting (ScrollLock to indicate
layout) all the time since comment #65 and haven't experienced any
issues. Except minor: scrollLock key is not able to control Scroll
(In reply to comment #67)
> Ilya, did you debug the problem with the led as you described in #64?
>
> Also, Daniel (the responsible for the patches to get accepted if I understood
> correctly) raised some concerns on #59. Do you think you could address them? I
> believe after that the patch will g
Ilya, did you debug the problem with the led as you described in #64?
Also, Daniel (the responsible for the patches to get accepted if I
understood correctly) raised some concerns on #59. Do you think you
could address them? I believe after that the patch will get accepted.
What do you think?
Th
** Project changed: xserver => xorg-server
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828684
Title:
[i965gm] False GPU lockup EIR: 0x0010 PGTBL_ER: 0x0100
To ma
I had a similar problem, I solved commenting the line below in
/etc/adobe/mms.cfg:
EnableLinuxHWVideoDecode=1
I think this is a problem on the nVidia graphics card.
Tested with sony VPCCW2S1E, nvidia 285.05.09 with GeForce GT 330M, kernel
3.0.0-15-generic, ubuntu 11.10 64bit
--
You received thi
I have something else to add to this bug report. I noticed something new
in syslog:
[drm:intel_dms_platform_mux_info] *ERROR* MUX INFO call failed
Xorg.0.log is the same as before: http://pastebin.com/hsnCw47g
Difernce from last time I tried is 3.2-rc7 kernel and ati 11.12 driver
version.
The b
you already had the i386 version installed? Remove it first.
** Changed in: xinput-calibrator (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xinput-calibrator in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789
51 matches
Mail list logo
