On 6 October 2010 07:46, javadayaz wrote:
> ok will do...although i did run one before ( after all these problems
> occurred, after i reapplied the thermal coating) but then quit after 70%
> ...but i will run it again!
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Rob Beard wrote:
>
>> On 06/10/10 06:58
well i let mine go to 70% ...and that was within half an hour...but like i
said ..i didnt let it finish...ill do so tonight when i get home!
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Andy Partington
wrote:
>
>
> On 6 October 2010 07:46, javadayaz wrote:
>
>> ok will do...although i did run one before ( af
Thanks for all the suggestions on this thread.
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 21:58 +0100, Byte Soup wrote:
> Im assuming the delay was due to some lead in silence on the track?
No. The CD player that the guy was using insisted on setting itself to
track 1. It then took four seconds to seek to the req
On 5 October 2010 16:48, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
>
>
> On 5 October 2010 14:28, pmgazz wrote:
>>> (Amarok is painfully slow, especially on GNOME and Exaile is also very
>>> slow and crashes a lot).
>
> There's your answer
>
Whose answer? To what question?
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
http
songbird is great, took me a little while to sort out banshee's mess but it
works briliently
On 6 October 2010 11:19, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 5 October 2010 16:48, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 5 October 2010 14:28, pmgazz wrote:
> >>> (Amarok is painfully slow, especially on GNOME and
On 05/10/10 16:26, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
banshee crashes every 10 seconds, due to the fact that I have 103.7GB of
music
On 5 October 2010 14:28, pmgazz wrote:
I have 97 GB of music, works fine for me - must be another reason why it's
crashing. You could try gmusicbrowser, I don't like
On 6 October 2010 13:14, pmgazz wrote:
> I have 97 GB of music, works fine for me - must be another reason why it's
> crashing. You could try gmusicbrowser, I don't like its interface but it's
> designed for big music collectoins.
>
Be nice to find out why banshee is crashing rather than just jum
On 06/10/10 12:17, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
songbird is great, took me a little while to sort out banshee's mess but it
works briliently
Still not in the repos though?
Paula
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
>Still not in the repos though?
songbird stopped linux support didn't they?
>
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
On 6 October 2010 13:43, Dan Attwood wrote:
>>Still not in the repos though?
> songbird stopped linux support didn't they?
>
Yup!
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/songbird-leaving-linux-behind
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wik
> > songbird stopped linux support didn't they?
>
> Yup!
>
http://getnightingale.com/ <-- Fork
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
On 06/10/10 13:14, Alan Pope wrote:
Be nice to find out why banshee is crashing rather than just jump ship
and use something else though.
Al.
Good point! But all the music browsers are a bit temperamental with big
collections except gmusicbrowser - so if I can't get anything else to
run
On 06/10/10 13:44, Alan Pope wrote:
On 6 October 2010 13:43, Dan Attwood wrote:
Still not in the repos though?
songbird stopped linux support didn't they?
Yup!
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/songbird-leaving-linux-behind
Al.
Whaaat? That's not nice :(
Paula
On 6 October 2010 13:54, pmgazz wrote:
> Good point! But all the music browsers are a bit temperamental with big
> collections
But if everyone just says "music player X is broken with large music
collections" and then _nobody_ files a bug about it, how will that
status quo ever change?
Cheers,
A
On 6 October 2010 13:51, David Houston wrote:
>
>> > songbird stopped linux support didn't they?
>>
>> Yup!
>
> http://getnightingale.com/ <-- Fork
>
That looks unpromising. A website and forum that has changed twice, no
code, no releases. I'll set my expectations accordingly.
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk
On 06/10/10 13:58, Alan Pope wrote:
But if everyone just says "music player X is broken with large music
collections" and then _nobody_ files a bug about it, how will that
status quo ever change?
Cheers,
Al.
OK OK, I'll try to be less of a slob ;)
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
songbird have a ppa on launchpad
On 6 October 2010 14:52, pmgazz wrote:
>
>
> On 06/10/10 13:58, Alan Pope wrote:
>
>
> But if everyone just says "music player X is broken with large music
> collections" and then _nobody_ files a bug about it, how will that
> status quo ever change?
>
> Cheers,
Hi
I've let the comp chug away at memtest for 6 hours..it came up with no
errors. I then stopped it,
I'm still get the text I posted earlier...I'm really disheartened now!
On 6 Oct 2010 09:01, "javadayaz" wrote:
> well i let mine go to 70% ...and that was within half an hour...but like i
> said .
Update:
So I was playing around in the bios..and perhaps stupidly, selected the
output to onboard. This has now rendered a black screen. The pc still turns
on but I see nothing. I must add that for the last few years I've been using
the graphics and no gcard.
Looks like its completely buggered now
19 matches
Mail list logo
