On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Ben Crisford wrote:
> I heard this yeah. I thought that the origin one made linux sound like some
> disease. I didn't like it.
Like you, I enjoyed the winning one but wasn't too keen on the Origin
one. Too dark and gloomy, whereas the winner was light and airy
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 08:54 +0100, Sean Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Ben Crisford
> wrote:
> > I heard this yeah. I thought that the origin one made linux sound like some
> > disease. I didn't like it.
>
> Like you, I enjoyed the winning one but wasn't too keen on the Orig
On 13 Apr 2009, at 09:30, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 08:54 +0100, Sean Miller wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Ben Crisford > > wrote:
>>> I heard this yeah. I thought that the origin one made linux sound
>>> like some
>>> disease. I didn't like it.
>>
>> Like yo
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:00 +0100, Harry Rickards wrote:
>
> On 13 Apr 2009, at 09:30, Philip Wyett wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 08:54 +0100, Sean Miller wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Ben Crisford >> > wrote:
> >>> I heard this yeah. I thought that the origin one made lin
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 03:22 +0100, Christopher Swift wrote:
> I'd like to get a general headcount for the day, so if possible could
> you email me back to this address either directly or through this
> mailing list so that I can get a rough estimate and/or give you
> directions for the (two) venu
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:21 +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:00 +0100, Harry Rickards wrote:
> >
> > On 13 Apr 2009, at 09:30, Philip Wyett wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 08:54 +0100, Sean Miller wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Ben Crisford > >> > wr
On 13 Apr 2009, at 10:46, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:21 +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:00 +0100, Harry Rickards wrote:
>>>
>>> On 13 Apr 2009, at 09:30, Philip Wyett wrote:
>>>
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 08:54 +0100, Sean Miller wrote:
> On Sun,
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:24 +0100, Harry Rickards wrote:
> > Indeed the file does play under VLC.
> >
> > http://twitpic.com/399a3/full
> >
> > I suspect some bastardisation along the way here with the format. The
> > "DIRECTX_DURATION=0x7FFF" element would point towards this
> > coming
On 13 Apr 2009, at 15:04, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:24 +0100, Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> Indeed the file does play under VLC.
>>>
>>> http://twitpic.com/399a3/full
>>>
>>> I suspect some bastardisation along the way here with the format.
>>> The
>>> "DIRECTX_DURATION=0x7FF
2009/4/12 Lucy :
> 2009/4/12 Gordon Allott :
>> the image of the world and clock are bugged out (on jaunty at least).
>> I'm gonna guess the rectangles of white are supposed to be glares,
>> see: http://i41.tinypic.com/bg7ib8.png
>
> Very strange. I created it on Intrepid so I'm surprised there's a
2009/4/12 Alan Pope :
> 2009/4/12 Lucy :
>> There is a slight problem with it though - because we need to have
>> everyone sign up in advance I needed to put a simple URL that people
>> could go to on the poster, so I've used the ubuntu-uk.org address.
>> Could someone put a link to the release par
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Daubney wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 03:22 +0100, Christopher Swift wrote:
>
>
>> I'd like to get a general headcount for the day, so if possible could
>> you email me back to this address either directly or through this
>> mailing list so
Who are the Linux Foundation?
Can Linus T not, perhaps, ask them to change their name? Perhaps to
the "Microsoft going on Linux Foundation" or similar?
If I had created an operating system so vast in its scope I'd be
seriously concerned if some people decided to take it upon themselves
to underm
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Sean Miller wrote:
> Who are the Linux Foundation?
>
A foundation set up to protect "Linux", most large open-source
projects have such an organisation behind them. Usually a holder of
IP, receiver of donations from sponsors, etc. The Linux Foundation
pays Linus to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean Miller wrote:
> Who are the Linux Foundation?
>
> Can Linus T not, perhaps, ask them to change their name? Perhaps to
> the "Microsoft going on Linux Foundation" or similar?
>
> If I had created an operating system so vast in its scope I'd be
>
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 02:07 +0100, Daniel Drummond wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sean Miller wrote:
> > Who are the Linux Foundation?
> >
> > Can Linus T not, perhaps, ask them to change their name? Perhaps to
> > the "Microsoft going on Linux Foundation" or simila
Daniel Drummond wrote:
> I think you may be confusing Torvalds for the FSF: they would be the
> ones most likely to get upset by a video promoting Linux in a non-free
> format.
Isn't this essentially Sean's problem - as Stallman has insisted for
years - that Torvalds doesn't care about freedom.
17 matches
Mail list logo
