On 26 May 2010 13:44, Dan Attwood wrote:
> > In fact, it shows up if you change the settings from "LTS Releases only"
> > to "Normal Releases". I think having established that, I might as well
> > go ahead and upgrade to it, so I shall do this now. The initial flurry
> > of glitch reports seems t
> In fact, it shows up if you change the settings from "LTS Releases only"
> to "Normal Releases". I think having established that, I might as well
> go ahead and upgrade to it, so I shall do this now. The initial flurry
> of glitch reports seems to have subsided.
given recent posts on moving arou
On 26 May 2010 12:40, Rowan Berkeley wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 12:00 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
>> On 26 May 2010 10:04, Rowan Berkeley
>> wrote:
>> > I have checked this several times. According to the settings it
>> > should show LTS releases.
>> What version are you currently running? The l
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 12:00 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 26 May 2010 10:04, Rowan Berkeley
> wrote:
> > I have checked this several times. According to the settings it
> > should show LTS releases.
> What version are you currently running? The lsb_release command helps
> here:- e.g.
> a...@bisho
