On Wednesday 01 November 2006 16:22, Albert Vilella wrote:
> Has anyone had any luck/problems with firewire hard drives? Anything I
> should be aware of?
>
at work we've been using lacie external firewire drives (actually 4 drives
appearing as one) for doing backups to and they have worked fine e
BTW, I found this table of information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA#eSATA_compared_to_other_buses
On 11/1/06, Albert Vilella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone had any luck/problems with firewire hard drives? Anything I
> should be aware of?
>
> On 11/1/06, Alan Pope <[EMAIL PROT
Has anyone had any luck/problems with firewire hard drives? Anything I
should be aware of?
On 11/1/06, Alan Pope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 02:44:43PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm running my desktop computer completely off a USB hard drive with no
> > problems
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 02:44:43PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm running my desktop computer completely off a USB hard drive with no
> problems. As long as you have a USB2.0 port and drive then the maximum
> transfer rate is 480MBPs. When you consider a standard PATA connection is
> only
I'm running my desktop computer completely off a USB hard drive with no problems. As long as you have a USB2.0 port and drive then the maximum transfer rate is 480MBPs. When you consider a standard PATA connection is only 133MBPs it's more than enough. Firewire connections are also faster then hard
Hi,
I am in the market for a fast external hard drive that I could
potentially use to have more than one Linux distro/version on my
laptop.
Has anyone had good experiences with firewire devices?
My idea would be to put the most essential IO-intensive parts of the
OS in the internal hard-drive, a