On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Simon Wears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Yes, the first thing I did was check for a BIOS update to solve my
> problems. It currently has 512mb RAM in it, because that's all I have spare
> for it at the moment, but I plan on putting about 4G into it soon, when I
> hav
Yes, the first thing I did was check for a BIOS update to solve my problems.
It currently has 512mb RAM in it, because that's all I have spare for it at
the moment, but I plan on putting about 4G into it soon, when I have time to
go buy some. So, I figure its worth installing the 64 bit version for
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Tony Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Rowson wrote:
> > [...]
> > I've always used 32bit edition on servers myself. I've heard horror
> > stories about perl scripts using twice as much memory under 64bit etc,
> > etc I've never tested PAE with more than
Chris Rowson wrote:
> [...]
> I've always used 32bit edition on servers myself. I've heard horror
> stories about perl scripts using twice as much memory under 64bit etc,
> etc I've never tested PAE with more than 4GB of RAM - I had heard
> about the single process limitation, but as I only
>
> > [...]
> > Doesn't the Hardy server kernel have Physical Address Extensions support
> > enabled by default? That'd grant support for up to 64GB RAM on the 32
> > bit version of Ubuntu.
>
> Hello, Chris.
>
> Yes, we're running 8.04.1 LTS with PAE enabled on servers with 8GB RAM
> and I've test
Chris Rowson wrote:
> [...]
> Doesn't the Hardy server kernel have Physical Address Extensions support
> enabled by default? That'd grant support for up to 64GB RAM on the 32
> bit version of Ubuntu.
Hello, Chris.
Yes, we're running 8.04.1 LTS with PAE enabled on servers with 8GB RAM
and I've
>
> > So, long story short:
> >
> > 32 bit or 64 bit server, and 8.04 or 8.10?
>
> Do you want stable (8.04) or something a bit more recent (8.10) ?
>
> How much memory do you have? If you want to use anything more than 4GB
> RAM then you'll need the 64 bit version. For a server I'd probably go
> w
Simon Wears wrote:
> Stability is more important for me. The machine currently has only 512mb
> of RAM (stolen from my desktop) but I'm headed to the shop tomorrow to
> pick up 1Gb or 2Gb of RAM.
>
I'd say stick 32-bit on it unless that is you need to run a specific
application that requires a
Simon Wears wrote:
> I went down to MicroDirect earlier today, and bought myself a shiny new
> Intel Quad Core Q6600, clocking at 2.4Ghz per core. I was so happy to be
> finally replacing my 2.6Ghz Celeron (single core), which struggles to
> even do 2+2 it seems. I got back into my flat, and rep
Stability is more important for me. The machine currently has only 512mb of
RAM (stolen from my desktop) but I'm headed to the shop tomorrow to pick up
1Gb or 2Gb of RAM.
2008/12/2 Lucy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2008/12/2 Simon Wears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So, long story short:
> >
> > 32 bit or 64
2008/12/2 Simon Wears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So, long story short:
>
> 32 bit or 64 bit server, and 8.04 or 8.10?
Do you want stable (8.04) or something a bit more recent (8.10) ?
How much memory do you have? If you want to use anything more than 4GB
RAM then you'll need the 64 bit version. For a
I went down to MicroDirect earlier today, and bought myself a shiny new
Intel Quad Core Q6600, clocking at 2.4Ghz per core. I was so happy to be
finally replacing my 2.6Ghz Celeron (single core), which struggles to even
do 2+2 it seems. I got back into my flat, and replaced the CPU, only to find
ou
Chris,
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 15:31 +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
> Tony Arnold wrote:
> > Sad indeed, but I'd like to know how these machines were compromised. In
>
> In case you'd not seen it linked to elsewhere:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2007-August/001510.html
Thanks,
Hi
Tony Arnold wrote:
> Sad indeed, but I'd like to know how these machines were compromised. In
In case you'd not seen it linked to elsewhere:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2007-August/001510.html
The machines were not owned or managed by Canonical, just paid for.
(I speak h
On 16/08/07, alan c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Press fodder. Set them up high and then knock 'em down. It makes news
> on the way up, and also on the way down.
> As Ubuntu gets higher profiles as I am sure It will, it is going to
> happen much more. A tribute to growing fame. I would be a bit hap
Chris Rowson wrote:
>> alan c wrote:
>> > Ubuntu Servers Hacked
>> > http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/15/1341224
>> >
>> >
>> > If this is true it is pretty sad. It will take some time for
>> > confidence to be regained. What a gift (or a result?) for the opposition!
>>
>
> I think th
> alan c wrote:
> > Ubuntu Servers Hacked
> > http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/15/1341224
> >
> >
> > If this is true it is pretty sad. It will take some time for
> > confidence to be regained. What a gift (or a result?) for the opposition!
>
I think that too much is being made of the
Alan,
alan c wrote:
> Ubuntu Servers Hacked
> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/15/1341224
>
>
> If this is true it is pretty sad. It will take some time for
> confidence to be regained. What a gift (or a result?) for the opposition!
Sad indeed, but I'd like to know how these machi
Jim Kissel wrote:
>
> alan c wrote:
>> Ubuntu Servers Hacked
>> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/15/1341224
>>
>>
>> If this is true it is pretty sad. It will take some time for
>> confidence to be regained. What a gift (or a result?) for the opposition!
>
> It was a case of self
alan c wrote:
> Ubuntu Servers Hacked
> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/15/1341224
>
>
> If this is true it is pretty sad. It will take some time for
> confidence to be regained. What a gift (or a result?) for the opposition!
It was a case of self inflected injuries. Using FTP
Ubuntu Servers Hacked
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/15/1341224
If this is true it is pretty sad. It will take some time for
confidence to be regained. What a gift (or a result?) for the opposition!
I was recently trying to reduce my ignorance about security by asking
questions
21 matches
Mail list logo
