Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu's Plans To Implement UEFI SecureBoot: No GRUB2

Sorry for those that probably recieve this. But thught might be of interest on the subject. - Mensaje original - > # Free Software Supporter > Issue 51, June 2012 > ***snip*** > ### FSF recommendations for free operating system distributions > considering Secure Boot (2012-06-30) >

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu's Plans To Implement UEFI SecureBoot: No GRUB2

Rob Beard wrote: > I was under the impression that with UEFI it is quicker booting than > a normal BIOS anyway, although the only experience I have of UEFI is > support in a ThinkPad T520 BIOS (which still takes a good couple of > seconds to do it's self checks and things). Most 'modern' bioses

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu's Plans To Implement UEFI SecureBoot: No GRUB2

On 22/06/12 18:08, Andres Muniz wrote: - Mensaje original - > Just saw this... > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEyNDY > since this was brought up: would this delay boot times? I'd expect not, at

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu's Plans To Implement UEFI SecureBoot: No GRUB2

- Mensaje original - > Just saw this... > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEyNDY > > > > since this was brought up: would this delay boot times? -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu's Plans To Implement UEFI SecureBoot: No GRUB2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/06/2012 17:26, mac wrote: > Just saw this... > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEyNDY > > > Some less ad-plastered links, direct from the horses' mouths: http://blog.canonical.com/2012/06/22/an-update-on-ubuntu-and-sec

[ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu's Plans To Implement UEFI SecureBoot: No GRUB2

Just saw this... http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEyNDY -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/