On 22 November 2012 14:12, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 18/11/12 22:00, Colin Law wrote:
>>
>> Barry, is the search bug this one [1] ? The upstream bug is marked fixed
>> though. Colin [1]
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1035091
>
>
> It is the identical bug - it was fixed in
On 18/11/12 22:00, Colin Law wrote:
Barry, is the search bug this one [1] ? The upstream bug is marked
fixed though. Colin [1]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1035091
It is the identical bug - it was fixed in Quantal but has re-appeared in
Raring. As it behaves diffe
On 18 November 2012 14:04, Barry Drake wrote:
> Just to say that the problem with Ubiquity not allowing an installation has
> gone away in yesterday's iso of 13.04, so I now have a working installation.
> Bugs to confirm so far: no menus in Nautilus and search bar in Nautilus
> finds items in top
On 18 November 2012 15:17, Colin Law wrote:
> On 18 November 2012 14:04, Barry Drake wrote:
>> Just to say that the problem with Ubiquity not allowing an installation has
>> gone away in yesterday's iso of 13.04, so I now have a working installation.
>> Bugs to confirm so far: no menus in Nautilu
On 18/11/12 14:04, Barry Drake wrote:
Just to say that the problem with Ubiquity not allowing an installation
has gone away in yesterday's iso of 13.04, so I now have a working
installation. Bugs to confirm so far: no menus in Nautilus and search
bar in Nautilus finds items in top level director
On 18 November 2012 14:04, Barry Drake wrote:
> Just to say that the problem with Ubiquity not allowing an installation has
> gone away in yesterday's iso of 13.04, so I now have a working installation.
> Bugs to confirm so far: no menus in Nautilus and search bar in Nautilus
> finds items in top
Just to say that the problem with Ubiquity not allowing an installation
has gone away in yesterday's iso of 13.04, so I now have a working
installation. Bugs to confirm so far: no menus in Nautilus and search
bar in Nautilus finds items in top level directory only (no recursion).
Regards,
On 05/11/12 14:01, Alan Bell wrote:
I never tested alphas and betas before, they came out on days I had
other stuff to do, so I always grabbed the daily iso for installation
tests because I didn't want to be reporting bugs that had already been
fixed. I guess you could call them "daily betas" a
On 05/11/12 15:42, A wrote:
> On 05/11/12 12:04, J Fernyhough wrote:
>> On 5 November 2012 11:18, A wrote:
>>> Does this not significantly reduce the opportunities for bug catching
>>> from the community?
>>>
>> Only for ISO testing. I just reinstalled a minimal quantal, changed
>> the sources.lis
On 05/11/12 12:04, J Fernyhough wrote:
> On 5 November 2012 11:18, A wrote:
>> Does this not significantly reduce the opportunities for bug catching
>> from the community?
>>
> Only for ISO testing. I just reinstalled a minimal quantal, changed
> the sources.list to raring, dist-upgrade, and away
why would you say that?
I never tested alphas and betas before, they came out on days I had
other stuff to do, so I always grabbed the daily iso for installation
tests because I didn't want to be reporting bugs that had already been
fixed. I guess you could call them "daily betas" and everyone
On 5 November 2012 11:18, A wrote:
> Does this not significantly reduce the opportunities for bug catching
> from the community?
>
Only for ISO testing. I just reinstalled a minimal quantal, changed
the sources.list to raring, dist-upgrade, and away I go.
J
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
On 05/11/12 10:59, Barry Drake wrote:
Hi there I notice that the pre-alpha daily build of 13.04 is out
there - but only in the AMD64 Mac architecture version so far. Anyone
know when the i386 version is due to appear?
The image builds are currently broken and are being worked on.
Cheers
On 05/11/12 11:18, A wrote:
Does this not significantly reduce the opportunities for bug catching
from the community?
Quite the opposite. You can test at any time. We're also looking to do
continuous deployment of Unity & friends. So you'll get the latest Unity
a day or so after it's landed
On 5 November 2012 11:10, Alan Bell wrote:
> well they won't be doing alphas and betas this cycle, just daily builds, a
> two week testing cadence (the QA team will try to run all the tests every
> two weeks). There might be release candidates at the end of the cycle, but
> generally as soon as th
No it doubles it
You make I'll break it. From my phoneA
wrote:Does this not significantly reduce the opportunities for bug catching
from the community?
On 05/11/12 11:10, Alan Bell wrote:
> well they won't be doing alphas and betas this cycle, just daily
> builds, a two week testing cadence (
Does this not significantly reduce the opportunities for bug catching
from the community?
On 05/11/12 11:10, Alan Bell wrote:
> well they won't be doing alphas and betas this cycle, just daily
> builds, a two week testing cadence (the QA team will try to run all
> the tests every two weeks). There
well they won't be doing alphas and betas this cycle, just daily builds,
a two week testing cadence (the QA team will try to run all the tests
every two weeks). There might be release candidates at the end of the
cycle, but generally as soon as things are buildable they will turn up
and are goo
Hi there I notice that the pre-alpha daily build of 13.04 is out
there - but only in the AMD64 Mac architecture version so far. Anyone
know when the i386 version is due to appear?
Regards,Barry.
--
Barry Drake is a member of the the Ubuntu Advertising team.
http://ubuntuadverts.o
19 matches
Mail list logo
