On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 11:35:52 Vince Marsters wrote:
> Morning All,
>
> Wonder if anyone can suggest anything to help me fix a small problem I am
> having. I am using Kubuntu with KDE 4.6.5 and Kmail 1.13.6 collecting email
> using IMAP. Whenever I open Kmail any existing mail does not show in the
Morning All,
Wonder if anyone can suggest anything to help me fix a small problem I am
having. I am using Kubuntu with KDE 4.6.5 and Kmail 1.13.6 collecting email
using IMAP. Whenever I open Kmail any existing mail does not show in the
preview pane until I double click to open it. After this it
On Friday 16 Oct 2009 21:00:56 Alan Pope wrote:
> 2009/10/16 Rob Beard :
> > Oh dear. I'm sure it was discussed a week or so ago about upgrading
> > between versions. I gather it's not a good idea to upgrade from more
> > than one version to another at a time, so I guess from Hardy, you'd need
>
2009/10/16 Rob Beard :
> Oh dear. I'm sure it was discussed a week or so ago about upgrading
> between versions. I gather it's not a good idea to upgrade from more
> than one version to another at a time, so I guess from Hardy, you'd need
> to upgrade to Intrepid, then Jaunty.
>
Indeed. The best
Mark Fraser wrote:
> I've tried the Kubuntu mailinglist, but haven't had a response. So I thought
> I'd try here.
>
> I tried to upgrade my wife's computer from Hardy to Jaunty this week after
> successfully doing it on 2 other computers. This time it started coming up
> with error messages sayi
I've tried the Kubuntu mailinglist, but haven't had a response. So I thought
I'd try here.
I tried to upgrade my wife's computer from Hardy to Jaunty this week after
successfully doing it on 2 other computers. This time it started coming up
with error messages saying certain packages couldn't b
I really like the Hardy (alpha 5) Kubuntu curly swirly wallpaper. 6.06
(misty bubbles) was not bad, it had a level of subtlety and mystery
which I appreciated, but since then I have been a bit unhappy with the
un inspired defaults - which live CD users get.
This Kubuntu alpha 5 has what looks l
: [ubuntu-uk] Kubuntu vs Ubuntu for new users
It all comes down to personal preference I guess, but the nice thing
about Gnome is that it hides the complexity of the system from the
user unless they actively go searching for it - and to someone for
whom a computer is effectively just a web-browser
It all comes down to personal preference I guess, but the nice thing
about Gnome is that it hides the complexity of the system from the
user unless they actively go searching for it - and to someone for
whom a computer is effectively just a web-browser and a platform for
email and IM clients that's
On 17/09/2007, Chris Rowson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Scrase, Eddie wrote:
> > > I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a
With reference to the 2-bars setup, My mother-in-law uses Ubuntu (on
my recommendation!), and the first thing she mentioned when I asked
her how sh
Chris Rowson wrote:
>> Scrase, Eddie wrote:
>>> I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a
>>> problem, you can always move everything from the top bar down to the
>>> bottom and then delete the top bar (which is what I have done on my
>>> installation). You can also replac
> Scrase, Eddie wrote:
> > I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a
> > problem, you can always move everything from the top bar down to the
> > bottom and then delete the top bar (which is what I have done on my
> > installation). You can also replace the Gnome
> > Applica
Scrase, Eddie wrote:
> I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a
> problem, you can always move everything from the top bar down to the
> bottom and then delete the top bar (which is what I have done on my
> installation). You can also replace the Gnome
> Applications/Plac
I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a problem, you
can always move everything from the top bar down to the bottom and then delete
the top bar (which is what I have done on my installation). You can also
replace the Gnome Applications/Places/System menus with a combine
Chris Rowson wrote:
> I promise, I'm not trolling!
>
> I've been moving users across from Windows to Linux for a while now,
> with - on the large - reasonable success. Because I use Gnome, and
> don't have much experience of using KDE, I've just always installed
> Ubuntu by default and not really
> I think this is definitely one for personal preference. I think that
> Kubuntu and kde have a lot to offer. However I personally prefer
> gnome. This isn't because I'm some numpty like some people would
> insist but because it works the way I expect it to.
>
> This is definitely a suck and see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/09/2007, Chris Rowson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > definitely worth a look so you can see for yourself.
> >
> > Matthew.
> >
> I thought that might be worth a bash Matthew,
>
> I've just installed Kubuntu Gutsy Tribe 5 to see what all of the f
> definitely worth a look so you can see for yourself.
>
> Matthew.
>
I thought that might be worth a bash Matthew,
I've just installed Kubuntu Gutsy Tribe 5 to see what all of the fuss
is about. In the past I've only tried installing kubuntu-desktop over
the top of gnome. First impressions are th
On 9/15/07, Chris Rowson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I promise, I'm not trolling!
It's unavoidable when you mention KDE and GNOME in the same email :)
Lately, I've demonstrated Ubuntu to some real computer novices who've
> commented "why is the start button at the top", and "why are there two
I promise, I'm not trolling!
I've been moving users across from Windows to Linux for a while now,
with - on the large - reasonable success. Because I use Gnome, and
don't have much experience of using KDE, I've just always installed
Ubuntu by default and not really given Kubuntu the time of day.
Hi Folks
At the LUG meeting I went to last night, one of the guys was trying to
install kubuntu onto his new laptop - an Advanta (?) that currently has
vista on it. He wanted to make it a dual boot machine, so far so good.
However, when the Live CD booted up, the maximum screen size it would all
Tristan,
Tristan Wibberley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 19:03 +0100, James Hargreaves wrote:
>> For anyone downloading Kubuntu 7.04 desktop i386 , I suggest using the
>> HTTP download, the torrent is much slower (>25kbps compared to ~70kbps
>> for HTTP) at the moment.
>
> Are you on British Tel
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 19:03 +0100, James Hargreaves wrote:
> For anyone downloading Kubuntu 7.04 desktop i386 , I suggest using the
> HTTP download, the torrent is much slower (>25kbps compared to ~70kbps
> for HTTP) at the moment.
Are you on British Telecom? I heard a rumour that bittorrent was
t
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:03:06PM +0100, James Hargreaves wrote:
> For anyone downloading Kubuntu 7.04 desktop i386 , I suggest using the HTTP
> download, the torrent is much slower (>25kbps compared to ~70kbps for HTTP)
> at the moment.
>
That's not normal. Have you opened the necessary ports o
For anyone downloading Kubuntu 7.04 desktop i386 , I suggest using the HTTP
download, the torrent is much slower (>25kbps compared to ~70kbps for HTTP)
at the moment.
Cheers,
James
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/U
Tez wrote:
> It's also on archive.org but doesn't seem to be live yet,
>
You can now watch it or download it from archive.org
http://www.archive.org/details/Installing_Updates_Kubuntu
Tez
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubunt
Alan Pope wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:13:08AM +, Stuart Parkington wrote:
>
>>> Ok, I gave this whole screencast thing a go, it's on upgrading packages,
>>> like Alans last one, but for Kubuntu.
>>> It's not what you'd call in-depth but I tried to cover the same stuff Alan
>>> wen
Stuart Parkington wrote:
>> Ok, I gave this whole screencast thing a go, it's on upgrading packages,
>> like Alans last one, but for Kubuntu.
>> It's not what you'd call in-depth but I tried to cover the same stuff Alan
>> went over in his one.
>> It's about 7 mins long and covers the Adept upda
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:13:08AM +, Stuart Parkington wrote:
> > Ok, I gave this whole screencast thing a go, it's on upgrading packages,
> > like Alans last one, but for Kubuntu.
> > It's not what you'd call in-depth but I tried to cover the same stuff Alan
> > went over in his one.
> > I
> Ok, I gave this whole screencast thing a go, it's on upgrading packages, like
> Alans last one, but for Kubuntu.
> It's not what you'd call in-depth but I tried to cover the same stuff Alan
> went over in his one.
> It's about 7 mins long and covers the Adept updater and Adept package manager,
Ok, I gave this whole screencast thing a go, it's on upgrading packages, like
Alans last one, but for Kubuntu.
It's not what you'd call in-depth but I tried to cover the same stuff Alan
went over in his one.
It's about 7 mins long and covers the Adept updater and Adept package manager,
which was
31 matches
Mail list logo
