Liam Proven wrote:
> 2009/5/3 Michael Douglas :
>
>> You're certainly better off than trying to get the Windows 7 Beta, or in
>> 2 days, the RC. It took MSFT about 10hours just to make the thing
>> available!!!
>>
>> -- Mehall
>>
>
> I've been running it for 10 days or so. The RC was widely
2009/5/3 Michael Douglas :
> You're certainly better off than trying to get the Windows 7 Beta, or in
> 2 days, the RC. It took MSFT about 10hours just to make the thing
> available!!!
>
> -- Mehall
I've been running it for 10 days or so. The RC was widely available on
Bittorrent as soon as it was
Hi all
A clip of the Ubuntu download can be seen at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/enhancedmobile/programmes/click/8028913
.stm
No need for iPlayer, unless you want to see the whole program.
Further clips of this program are at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online/default.stm
Tony
LeeGroups wrote:
> Never seen it mentioned in others T&Cs, but then it's high volume use
> was always binary groups, and they've pretty much died out from via
> ISPs, so you have to pay subs to someone like Giganews otherwise they
> don't work...
>
Well they certainly don't promote the fact
>>> Same here. I have suspicions that my ISP (PlusNet) is throttling
>>> BitTorrent, but I'm not 100% sure.
>>>
>> PlusNet *do* throttle torrent traffic, it's in their T&C's check here -
>>
>> http://www.plus.net/support/broadband/quality_broadband/speed.shtml#unlimitedspeeds
>>
>> It var
Yeah, like your little network would make any significant difference to the
capabilities of Microsofts. Lets try to be realistic here. Denial of service is
just another form censorship.
--- On Mon, 4/5/09, James Milligan wrote:
From: James Milligan
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Click
> Same here. I have suspicions that my ISP (PlusNet) is throttling
> BitTorrent, but I'm not 100% sure.
PlusNet *do* throttle torrent traffic, it's in their T&C's check here -
http://www.plus.net/support/broadband/quality_broadband/speed.shtml#unlimitedspeeds
It varies depending on the time o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
LeeGroups wrote:
>> Same here. I have suspicions that my ISP (PlusNet) is throttling
>> BitTorrent, but I'm not 100% sure.
>
> PlusNet *do* throttle torrent traffic, it's in their T&C's check here -
>
> http://www.plus.net/support/broadband/quality
> After all, better to have people use Ubuntu because they
> like it, rather than because they hate Windows.
Aww... can't I use Ubuntu because I like it *and* I hate Windows? :)
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John McCourt wrote:
> Yeah, like your little network would make any significant difference to
> the capabilities of Microsofts. Lets try to be realistic here. Denial of
> service is just another form censorship.
>
...
> I might download the RC a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Beard wrote:
> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> Yeah, for some reason I always get faster speeds using BitTorrent. I was
>> downloading something via BT the other day that took about 25 seconds to
>> download a 200MB file, yet I only get 10 MB/s download w
-replied off list-
On 4 May 2009, at 12:07, Harry Rickards wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Milligan wrote:
>> Just to piggy back onto this, has anyone got a product key they
>> aren't
>> going to use? I work in an IT shop so it would be good to have some
>> p
Harry Rickards wrote:
> Yeah, for some reason I always get faster speeds using BitTorrent. I was
> downloading something via BT the other day that took about 25 seconds to
> download a 200MB file, yet I only get 10 MB/s download when downloading
> from Cachefly's 'distributed server network' or wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Milligan wrote:
> Just to piggy back onto this, has anyone got a product key they aren't
> going to use? I work in an IT shop so it would be good to have some
> practice on it (Windows 7)
>
> Also, I think it's a bit unfair to slow the serve
Harry Rickards wrote:
> I might download the RC a few times on my VPS in America that's got
> roughly 10 meg/sec connection, just to slow their servers down. I'd
> never willing use a Microsoft product in a million years.
>
> - --
> Many thanks
> Harry Rickards (a.k.a l33tmyst)
>
I have a feelin
Just to piggy back onto this, has anyone got a product key they aren't
going to use? I work in an IT shop so it would be good to have some
practice on it (Windows 7)
Also, I think it's a bit unfair to slow the servers down just because
you can. It's a free world, let people choose what softw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Beard wrote:
> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> I suppose now I think of it, the CD is approx 700 MB, so multiply that
>> b/y 8 and you get 5600 Mb. If the connection is 100 Mb/s, one copy will
>> take roughly 56 seconds so two will take approx (I just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Beard wrote:
> Michael Douglas wrote:
>> You're certainly better off than trying to get the Windows 7 Beta, or in
>> 2 days, the RC. It took MSFT about 10hours just to make the thing
>> available!!!
>>
>> -- Mehall
>>
> I had an e-mail from Mi
Harry Rickards wrote:
> Yeah, I suppose you're right, if I download it in a proprietary format
> anyway, I might as well watch it in one. Still, if enough people want
> it the BBC may provide iplayer video in OGG like they do with R&D TV.
> I doubt of but it's worth a try.
>
> Many thanks
> H
Michael Douglas wrote:
> You're certainly better off than trying to get the Windows 7 Beta, or in
> 2 days, the RC. It took MSFT about 10hours just to make the thing
> available!!!
>
> -- Mehall
>
I had an e-mail from Microsoft today, they're making Windows 7 RC
available to the 'little peopl
Harry Rickards wrote:
> I suppose now I think of it, the CD is approx 700 MB, so multiply that
> b/y 8 and you get 5600 Mb. If the connection is 100 Mb/s, one copy will
> take roughly 56 seconds so two will take approx (I just know some
> broadband expert will come and give me some value I ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Dobson wrote:
> It's naive to think that the .mov file extension refers to it being in a
> nonfree video format.
>
> Actually the reason get_iplayer can get the video is because the iphone
> (possibly one of the most drm'd devices in the world)
It's naive to think that the .mov file extension refers to it being in a
nonfree video format.
Actually the reason get_iplayer can get the video is because the iphone
(possibly one of the most drm'd devices in the world) couldnt support
Windows media DRM so they made it h.264 codec video.
You
David King wrote:
> I find it only downloads in .mov format (QuickTime).
>
> David King
>
>
>
> Harry Rickards wrote:
>
>> On 3 May 2009, at 21:35, Simos Xenitellis
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Harry Rickards
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 3 May
I find it only downloads in .mov format (QuickTime).
David King
Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 3 May 2009, at 21:35, Simos Xenitellis
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Harry Rickards
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3 May 2009, at 21:18, David King wrote:
>>>
>>>
I was w
They also offer R&D TV under the Creative Commons, and via torrent. One
step at a time my friend :D
-- Mehall
Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 3 May 2009, at 21:52, Michael Douglas wrote:
>
>
>> Downloads to .mov by default, IIRC get_iplayer has options to have
>> ffmpeg convert it. I don't bother
On 3 May 2009, at 21:52, Michael Douglas wrote:
> Downloads to .mov by default, IIRC get_iplayer has options to have
> ffmpeg convert it. I don't bother, I just open up VLC and watch the
> damn
> thing.
>
> -- Mehall
>
> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> On 3 May 2009, at 21:35, Simos Xenitellis
>>
Downloads to .mov by default, IIRC get_iplayer has options to have
ffmpeg convert it. I don't bother, I just open up VLC and watch the damn
thing.
-- Mehall
Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 3 May 2009, at 21:35, Simos Xenitellis
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Harry Rickards
>
On 3 May 2009, at 21:35, Simos Xenitellis
wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Harry Rickards
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3 May 2009, at 21:18, David King wrote:
>>
>>> I was watching the BBC News 24 TV programme "Click" broadcast this
>>> weekend. When they were testing a 100 Mbit/s broadba
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 21:38 +0100, Michael Douglas wrote:
> You're certainly better off than trying to get the Windows 7 Beta, or in
> 2 days, the RC. It took MSFT about 10hours just to make the thing
> available!!!
>
> -- Mehall
>
> Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:22 PM,
On 3 May 2009, at 21:38, Michael Douglas wrote:
> You're certainly better off than trying to get the Windows 7 Beta,
> or in
> 2 days, the RC. It took MSFT about 10hours just to make the thing
> available!!!
>
> -- Mehall
>
> Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Harry Ri
That was only one copy, and I was being conservative ;)
-- Mehall
Dave Walker wrote:
> Michael Douglas wrote:
>
>> 100 Mbit/s? Best guess inside of 3mins.
>>
>>
>>
> d...@virgo:~$ time wget
> http://ubuntu-releases.datahop.it/jaunty/ubuntu-9.04-desktop-i386.iso
> --21:43:00--
> http://u
Michael Douglas wrote:
> 100 Mbit/s? Best guess inside of 3mins.
>
>
d...@virgo:~$ time wget
http://ubuntu-releases.datahop.it/jaunty/ubuntu-9.04-desktop-i386.iso
--21:43:00--
http://ubuntu-releases.datahop.it/jaunty/ubuntu-9.04-desktop-i386.iso
=> `ubuntu-9.04-desktop-i386.iso'
Resolv
You're certainly better off than trying to get the Windows 7 Beta, or in
2 days, the RC. It took MSFT about 10hours just to make the thing
available!!!
-- Mehall
Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Harry Rickards wrote:
>
>> On 3 May 2009, at 21:18, David King wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Harry Rickards wrote:
>
>
> On 3 May 2009, at 21:18, David King wrote:
>
>> I was watching the BBC News 24 TV programme "Click" broadcast this
>> weekend. When they were testing a 100 Mbit/s broadband connection,
>> they
>> used it to download two copies of Ubuntu
You also have to account for the fact that the server might be at high
capacity, so you might not get full speed, etc, etc, hence my
conservative guess of 3mins, but yes, easily inside 5mins anyway, and
that's two copies, so Ubuntu AND Kubuntu ;)
-- Mehall
Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 3 May 2009
On 3 May 2009, at 21:25, Michael Douglas wrote:
> 100 Mbit/s? Best guess inside of 3mins.
>
> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> On 3 May 2009, at 21:18, David King wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I was watching the BBC News 24 TV programme "Click" broadcast this
>>> weekend. When they were testing a 100 Mbit/s broadb
100 Mbit/s? Best guess inside of 3mins.
Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 3 May 2009, at 21:18, David King wrote:
>
>
>> I was watching the BBC News 24 TV programme "Click" broadcast this
>> weekend. When they were testing a 100 Mbit/s broadband connection,
>> they
>> used it to download two copies
On 3 May 2009, at 21:18, David King wrote:
> I was watching the BBC News 24 TV programme "Click" broadcast this
> weekend. When they were testing a 100 Mbit/s broadband connection,
> they
> used it to download two copies of Ubuntu 9.04 simultaneously. A good
> advert for Ubuntu.
Just out of
I was watching the BBC News 24 TV programme "Click" broadcast this
weekend. When they were testing a 100 Mbit/s broadband connection, they
used it to download two copies of Ubuntu 9.04 simultaneously. A good
advert for Ubuntu.
David King
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
40 matches
Mail list logo
