On 23/01/2008, Pete Stean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you could of course just go for instant gratification, and go out and
> buy one of the tubes of Cadbury's chocolate 'Snaps'
>
> :)
>
> Pete
>
> =
> check out my new blog @ http://peteste.blogspot.com
>
>
you could of course just go for instant gratification, and go out and
buy one of the tubes of Cadbury's chocolate 'Snaps'
:)
Pete
=
check out my new blog @ http://peteste.blogspot.com
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
- "Andrew Jenkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dianne Reuby wrote:
> > a) In order to ingratiate myself with all parties, I'll do both.
> >
> > b) Can any of you hardware experts recommend a modem that will
> download
> > chocolate oranges?
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 23:01 +, Kris Doug
Dianne Reuby wrote:
> a) In order to ingratiate myself with all parties, I'll do both.
>
> b) Can any of you hardware experts recommend a modem that will download
> chocolate oranges?
>
> On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 23:01 +, Kris Douglas wrote:
>
>> I frickin' love chocolate oranges!
>>
>> Additio
On 21/01/2008, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 00:26 +, Mark Burns wrote:
> > On a side note, it might just be me, but I dont think Chocolate Oranges
> > will mix to well with a Flame War.
> >
> > So I would like to suggest a brief ceasefire, so th
a) In order to ingratiate myself with all parties, I'll do both.
b) Can any of you hardware experts recommend a modem that will download
chocolate oranges?
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 23:01 +, Kris Douglas wrote:
> I frickin' love chocolate oranges!
>
> Additionally. OMG FLAME WAR!!! TOP POST
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 00:26 +, Mark Burns wrote:
> On a side note, it might just be me, but I dont think Chocolate Oranges
> will mix to well with a Flame War.
>
> So I would like to suggest a brief ceasefire, so that all innocent
> Chocolate Oranges may be moved a safe distance away from the
Thanks for the welcome guys!
(This message probably isn't going to help in the whole top/bottom post
thing at all.)
E wrote:
> Welcome to the group - as you've been a lurker for a little while now
> we'll expect full participation in all areas - especially those that
> go wandering off at tangent
On 20/01/2008, Chris Oattes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A. Because it makes things easier to read
> Q. Why should people bottom post?
>
> Kirrus said the following on 20/01/08 22:43:
> >
> Wandering off at a tangent? We never _ever_ do that! ;)
> >>> /me thinks about breaking open a chocola
A. Because it makes things easier to read
Q. Why should people bottom post?
Kirrus said the following on 20/01/08 22:43:
>
Wandering off at a tangent? We never _ever_ do that! ;)
>>> /me thinks about breaking open a chocolate orange...
>>>
>>> Ah, tap and unwrap. I can taste it now :-)
> > > Wandering off at a tangent? We never _ever_ do that! ;)
> >
> > /me thinks about breaking open a chocolate orange...
> >
> > Ah, tap and unwrap. I can taste it now :-)
>
> but the instructions now say "strike" not "tap"
>
Its more like smash on a hard surface, with great r
11 matches
Mail list logo
