On 19 April 2010 09:10, Paul Morgan-Roach wrote:
> Not sure if it's any use to anyone on here, but backuppc (available in the
> repositories) is a very nice solution, as it's a perl based with a nice web
> interface that allows backup using SMB, rsync over SSH, etc.
>
> It handles incremental back
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:01 AM, mac wrote:
>
> I can see that in an office, with a lot of data, having hourly, daily,
> weekly, etc., snapshots is much more important.
>
>
Not sure if it's any use to anyone on here, but backuppc (available in the
repositories) is a very nice solution, as it's
Alan Lord (News) wrote:
> The way my script (and I think rsync) works is that what is stored on my
> backup location is only a copy of what was last backed up (i.e. last
> night). If I wanted to restore a system to how it was say 3 days or one
> week ago I don't think you can.
Ah, I see. I do
On 19/04/10 08:00, mac wrote:
> Alan Lord (News) wrote:
>
>> It isn't perfect - currently it uses rsync but this makes it hard to
>> recover from a few days (or weeks) ago. I've been meaning to migrate it
>> to rsnapshot but just haven't got round to it yet.
>
> Would you mind saying a bit more ab
Alan Lord (News) wrote:
> It isn't perfect - currently it uses rsync but this makes it hard to
> recover from a few days (or weeks) ago. I've been meaning to migrate it
> to rsnapshot but just haven't got round to it yet.
Would you mind saying a bit more about the problem with rsync? I've
use
On 17/04/10 22:55, Rob Beard wrote:
> It is pretty good advice taking nightly backups (or at least regular
> backups). I tend to backup more now than I did in the past, touch wood
> when drives have failed it's not been really critical stuff that I've
> lost. I now tend to backup a lot of stuff
