Re: [ubuntu-uk] [marketing] Bug #1 - what we're up against

2007-08-23 Thread Paul Tansom
** Darren Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-23 11:09]: > On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 10:57 +0100, alan c wrote: > > Phil Bull wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 10:19 +0100, Matthew Larsen wrote: > > >> Well thats the biggest threat to linux: If Microsoft charged > > >> reasonable licenses for their

Re: [ubuntu-uk] [marketing] Bug #1 - what we're up against

2007-08-23 Thread Darren Mansell
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 10:57 +0100, alan c wrote: > Phil Bull wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > > > Hope work's going well. > > > > On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 10:19 +0100, Matthew Larsen wrote: > >> Well thats the biggest threat to linux: If Microsoft charged > >> reasonable licenses for their software (ie £2

Re: [ubuntu-uk] [marketing] Bug #1 - what we're up against

2007-08-23 Thread alan c
Phil Bull wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Hope work's going well. > > On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 10:19 +0100, Matthew Larsen wrote: >> Well thats the biggest threat to linux: If Microsoft charged >> reasonable licenses for their software (ie £20 for Vista >> Ultimate), FOSS would be blown out of the water. >

Re: [ubuntu-uk] [marketing] Bug #1 - what we're up against

2007-08-23 Thread Pete Stean
MS are also introducing a PAYG system in Brazil I understand, in order to tackle piracy. Something like $30 a quarter, although I'm not sure we're talking US $ - bound to be something on the Register about it... Pete On 23/08/07, Phil Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > Hope work's

Re: [ubuntu-uk] [marketing] Bug #1 - what we're up against

2007-08-23 Thread Phil Bull
Hi Matt, Hope work's going well. On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 10:19 +0100, Matthew Larsen wrote: > Well thats the biggest threat to linux: If Microsoft charged > reasonable licenses for their software (ie £20 for Vista Ultimate), > FOSS would be blown out of the water. I really have to disagree on that

Re: [ubuntu-uk] [marketing] Bug #1 - what we're up against

2007-08-23 Thread Jim Kissel
Matthew Larsen wrote: > Well thats the biggest threat to linux: If Microsoft charged > reasonable licenses for their software (ie £20 for Vista Ultimate), > FOSS would be blown out of the water. > > But MS is a monopoly and that won't happen unless they really need to Sorry to rain on your para

Re: [ubuntu-uk] [marketing] Bug #1 - what we're up against

2007-08-23 Thread Matthew Larsen
Well thats the biggest threat to linux: If Microsoft charged reasonable licenses for their software (ie £20 for Vista Ultimate), FOSS would be blown out of the water. But MS is a monopoly and that won't happen unless they really need to On 17/08/07, alan c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neil Greenw

Re: [ubuntu-uk] [marketing] Bug #1 - what we're up against

2007-08-17 Thread alan c
Neil Greenwood wrote: > A very good discussion about why Linux doesn't have a greater market share. > http://tlug.jp/articles/Windows_Is_Free A well put case with a closely argued set of points. Worth reading. also see: How Microsoft conquered China http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune