Rob Beard wrote:
> Still, sounds good that they are releasing something under the GPL,
> funny how they didn't release it under GPL 3.
>
>
Because that would mean it couldn't go into Linux?
James
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.
alan c wrote:
> can be made easily. The foss rising tide will mean this may not be
> with computing.
>
Should there be any such 'rising tide', and it become entirely clear
that there is no money to
be made in software R&D (only in supporting 'innovation ... elsewhere')
then where is
the inve
Chris Rowson wrote:
> If I had 10 servers I wouldn't pay $27,500 for email/telephone support
> covering only the operating system.
>
I suspect that if you knew what the inside of a datacentre looked like,
you'd feel differently
The sad fact of the matter is that Windows is not an expensive syste
Sean Miller wrote:
> So I'd be amazed if Canonical have built a support model whereby if
> you have 10 servers only one is supported if you pay them £1,500 or
> whatever it works out at in UK terms... if you have an issue on one
> server then chances are it's also an issue on the other nine... s
Daniel Lamb wrote:
> No but seriously how can anyone have anything again linux? I really
> struggle with that.
>
Hmm. I've been using Linux since Yggdrassil was the new kid on the
block and I could
get an SLS subscription on 3.5" floppies. And I definitely have things
against Linux. Take
off
Chris Rowson wrote:
>> Who wrote this? I've not read anything as poorly thought out and badly
>> researched as this in a long time!
>>
>
> Actually I found out exactly who writes this pro MS anti Linux stuff...
>
> It's the chairman of the FSB IT committee, who coincidentally develops
> softwa
