Andres wrote:
> So it seems that for linux users they would be better off using the
> core fortran than using the gui on wine?
It'd make sense to leave a choice, if the UI works under Wine, or near
as dammit, it'd be nice to provide that as well as the CLI. You never
know someone else might write
Thank you for your replies! The fortran program has no front end it's all done
trhrough the command line. But he might have used some C you're probably right.
I know that C and fortaran seem to get along well but that is the extent of it.
The terminal stays open as a separate window from the GUI
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:22 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> On 14/06/11 22:14, Colin Law wrote:
> > On 14 June 2011 22:10, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> >> I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS!
> >> Ubuntu 11.04 and Libre Office 3.3.2.
> >> the Ubuntu version of Libre Office will STILL NOT USE the Thunder
On 14 June 2011 22:26, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> On 14/06/11 22:22, Avi wrote:
>>
>> Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14/06/11 22:13, Avi wrote:
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU CANONICAL?
> WHY CANNOT YOU IMPLEMENT THIS VERY SIMPLE FUNCTION?
Avi wrote:
> Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
>
> > It's not a bug, it's the way Canonical add the Office suite to
> > Ubuntu. It's been going on for years with Open Office and now
> > they've done the same with LO...
> > If you use Evolution then OO (or LO I presume, I uninstall
> > Evolution becaus
On 14/06/11 22:22, Avi wrote:
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
On 14/06/11 22:13, Avi wrote:
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU CANONICAL?
WHY CANNOT YOU IMPLEMENT THIS VERY SIMPLE FUNCTION?
Why haven't you? You can append the patch to the bug report on
Launchpad, though it migh
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> It's not a bug, it's the way Canonical add the Office suite to
> Ubuntu. It's been going on for years with Open Office and now they've
> done the same with LO...
> If you use Evolution then OO (or LO I presume, I uninstall Evolution
> because I never use it) will us
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> On 14/06/11 22:13, Avi wrote:
> > Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> >
> >> WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU CANONICAL?
> >> WHY CANNOT YOU IMPLEMENT THIS VERY SIMPLE FUNCTION?
> > Why haven't you? You can append the patch to the bug report on
> > Launchpad, though it might be nice
On 14/06/11 22:14, Colin Law wrote:
On 14 June 2011 22:10, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS!
Ubuntu 11.04 and Libre Office 3.3.2.
the Ubuntu version of Libre Office will STILL NOT USE the Thunderbird
addressbook as an address data source!
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU CANONICAL?
WHY
On 14/06/11 22:13, Avi wrote:
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU CANONICAL?
WHY CANNOT YOU IMPLEMENT THIS VERY SIMPLE FUNCTION?
Why haven't you? You can append the patch to the bug report on
Launchpad, though it might be nicer to send it straight to the LO guys.
It's nothing
On 14 June 2011 22:10, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS!
> Ubuntu 11.04 and Libre Office 3.3.2.
> the Ubuntu version of Libre Office will STILL NOT USE the Thunderbird
> addressbook as an address data source!
>
> WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU CANONICAL?
> WHY CANNOT YOU IMPLEMENT THIS
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU CANONICAL?
> WHY CANNOT YOU IMPLEMENT THIS VERY SIMPLE FUNCTION?
Why haven't you? You can append the patch to the bug report on
Launchpad, though it might be nicer to send it straight to the LO guys.
--
Avi
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS!
Ubuntu 11.04 and Libre Office 3.3.2.
the Ubuntu version of Libre Office will STILL NOT USE the Thunderbird
addressbook as an address data source!
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU CANONICAL?
WHY CANNOT YOU IMPLEMENT THIS VERY SIMPLE FUNCTION?
Why do those of us who don't like Evolut
Damn, if only I lived closer to London!
Daniel
On 13 June 2011 20:43, TT Mooney wrote:
> Hi all --
>
> I am getting rid of some surplus equipment from home, and rather than
> fuss with Ebay, I thought perhaps someone on the list would be interested.
>
> Current techie toys littering the flat inc
On 13 June 2011 22:57, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> hiyas,
> Crikey... a 250MB usb hard drive? Please let me have some more details as
> the lowest we can get Lubuntu down to as a full install is 2.7GB on Hard
> Disk - I am sure JM would love to have a look at it.
> Regards,
> Phill.
:) I am guessing
It sounds that you might be getting the programming language and GUI
interface confused: the core of the program is written in Fortran, and I
suspect (from what you've written) that GUI part of the program is
probably written in C/C++ with the GUI interface being the Win32 API.
Either the GTK+ or
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:28:09 +0100
andres wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a question mainly for developers. I think. It's really a
> curiosity of mine and I have little say in the result of the project.
>
> Someone I know is thinking of releasing his software. It's a program
> that at it's core is
17 matches
Mail list logo