Re: [ubuntu-uk] Frankenstein Unity

2011-06-01 Thread Jon Reynolds
On Tue, 31 May 2011 22:14:37 +0100, Colin Law wrote: No, I did not miss that, but I do not fully understand. By suggesting that "Unity is the Frankenstein character" are you suggesting that Unity *creates* a monster? I thought you meant that you feel Unity *is* the monster lacking humanity.

Re: [ubuntu-uk] back again at 64 bit

2011-06-01 Thread Barry Drake
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 13:01 +0100, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote: > Hello a work collegue has a 64 bit machine and tried running (live > usb) natty on it. and said it failed. Natty 64 bit freezes during boot time - the bit where the opening music playes, and X starts up. It is a total crash. I rep

Re: [ubuntu-uk] back again at 64 bit

2011-06-01 Thread scoundrel50a
On 01/06/11 13:01, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote: Hello a work collegue has a 64 bit machine and tried running (live usb) natty on it. and said it failed. I tried at my work PC downloaded the 64bit version and used the web guide to install it on a USB. Seemed to work fine but when I clicked on "tr

Re: [ubuntu-uk] back again at 64 bit

2011-06-01 Thread Andrés Muñiz Piniella
10.04 seems to have installed OK. I think it has to do more with the pendrive linux thing. I could have sworn that it finished differently. Is it worth reporting? where to? running it off a USB but when trying to install the nvidia drivers but said something about missing the address: no address a

[ubuntu-uk] back again at 64 bit

2011-06-01 Thread Andrés Muñiz Piniella
Hello a work collegue has a 64 bit machine and tried running (live usb) natty on it. and said it failed. I tried at my work PC downloaded the 64bit version and used the web guide to install it on a USB. Seemed to work fine but when I clicked on "try ubuntu" busybox code came by and said the follow