On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 05:38 +, Alexander Birchall wrote:
> 3. This is what the monitor was displaying:
>
> "Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems:
> -- Boot args (cat /proc/cmdline)
> -- Check rootdelay= (did the system wait long enough?)
> -- Check root= (did the system wai
Hi John and Tyler,
The situation is that the server was moved to a virtual platform a few months
ago. Since then I only have remote access if the server has fully restarted.
If a problem such as this develops, then I have to rely on our IT department
(where linux skills are thin on the grou
I these lines thought it would be interesting to share:
http://open-pc.com/ seems to have come from desktop.org or something:
http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/columns/openpc_project_ready_made_gnu_linux_machines?utm_campaign=Linux+-+Google+News&utm_medium=Twitter&utm_source=SNS.analytics
##
On 22 Feb 2011, at 17:55, Dave Morley wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 17:00 +, Alan Lord (News) wrote:
>> On 20/02/11 13:54, Liam Proven wrote:
>>>
>>> The following, although it may seem petter, isn't. It's important. I
>>> don't want to seem ungrateful but it's kind of a big deal.
>>
>>
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 17:00 +, Alan Lord (News) wrote:
> On 20/02/11 13:54, Liam Proven wrote:
> >
> > The following, although it may seem petter, isn't. It's important. I
> > don't want to seem ungrateful but it's kind of a big deal.
>
> For you it maybe. For many others I doubt it very much.
On 20/02/11 13:54, Liam Proven wrote:
The following, although it may seem petter, isn't. It's important. I
don't want to seem ungrateful but it's kind of a big deal.
For you it maybe. For many others I doubt it very much.
*Please*, do not use that bulletin-board style "@Liam" thing again, to
On 22 Feb 2011 16:28, "Alan Lord (News)" wrote:
>
> Wow!
>
> Hassan, if you are replying to several people in one message then using
@soandso is fine by me. :-)
>
> I do not think we need to be so prescriptive as to require rules about the
syntax of how to reply.
>
> It's the same as top or bottom
On 22/02/11 15:26, Hassan "Haz" Williamson wrote:
On 20 February 2011 13:54, Liam Proven mailto:lpro...@gmail.com>> wrote:
*Please*, do not use that bulletin-board style "@Liam" thing again, to
anyone on any mailing list. I missed your message because it wasn't
threaded as a response
On 20 February 2011 13:54, Liam Proven wrote:
>
> *Please*, do not use that bulletin-board style "@Liam" thing again, to
> anyone on any mailing list. I missed your message because it wasn't
> threaded as a response to me.
>
>
My sincerest apologies, I shall avoid doing so in future. I've been try
On 22/02/11 13:34, McGibbney, Lewis John wrote:
Hi list,
This is a problem which has been bothering me for some time I am
> using 10.04 and have been experiencing the above problem. Every
> time I navigate to a page on my browser I am prompted to
> authenticate.
That sounds like an issue with
Hi list,
This is a problem which has been bothering me for some time I am using 10.04
and have been experiencing the above problem. Every time I navigate to a page
on my browser I am prompted to authenticate. Every time I try to run updates I
get the Apt issue as above. I am connected to the ne
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 11:44 +, John Stevenson wrote:
> How long you should wait probably depends on what the server is doing
> now. You request does not state what state the server is currenty in,
> so it is difficult to advise.
Indeed. Your description implies that you're not near the serve
On 22 February 2011 10:23, Alexander Birchall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just gone through the procedure of upgrading from Ubuntu server
> Hardy Heron 8.04 to the latest version (10.04 LTS), using the upgrade
> manager. The procedure took a couple of hours to complete, and then I was
> asked to res
Hi,
I have just gone through the procedure of upgrading from Ubuntu server Hardy
Heron 8.04 to the latest version (10.04 LTS), using the upgrade manager. The
procedure took a couple of hours to complete, and then I was asked to restart
the server. This I did, but that was half an hour ago.
14 matches
Mail list logo
