On 19/02/2011 06:05, Hassan "Haz" Williamson wrote:
@Mac, Thanks for that. Interesting read. Personally I'm going where the
developers are, I have a feeling that Oracle might try to swing things to
their favour and might close down some aspects of OOo - either that or try
to incorporate their own
@Mac, Thanks for that. Interesting read. Personally I'm going where the
developers are, I have a feeling that Oracle might try to swing things to
their favour and might close down some aspects of OOo - either that or try
to incorporate their own proprietary database system in somehow. I could be
wr
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:44 AM, mac wrote:
> Just to follow up the recent thread - I guess some but not all of us may
> have come across this:
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/d/applications/open-office-dilemma-openofficeorg-vs-libreoffice-716
Interesting - thanks for that.
I have LibreOffice 3.3 r
On 18/02/11 11:35, John MM wrote:
I am running Ubuntu 1-0.10 on both my machines. I have tried a few
thigns already to get the network to wowk, but I cant.
If I go to Places>Network I see just a windows Icon with no Ubuntu Icon
there to share, and when i click on it, it says unable to mount.
I
the fact that the line you added has a # at the start indicates that
it is a comment and will not effect the configuration of samba.
try this - http://tinyurl.com/645hsq2
Jacob Mansfield
Programmer
CyberKing Solutions™
www.cyberkingsolutions.co.uk - I do know the database is down
"When Windows™ is
I am running Ubuntu 1-0.10 on both my machines. I have tried a few
thigns already to get the network to wowk, but I cant.
If I go to Places>Network I see just a windows Icon with no Ubuntu Icon
there to share, and when i click on it, it says unable to mount.
I have gone into Nautilus and clic