On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Matt Wheeler wrote:
> (Sorry for top posting, I'm on my phone)
> Reinstalling will probably make no difference. You could try this command:
> mv .mozilla/firefox .mozilla/firefox-old
>
> This will move your profile so firefox will create a new one. If it works
> w
Rob Beard wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Not sure if anyone else has seen this. I just installed Google Chrome
> and found that there were about 400 odd updates which I needed to
> install. As far as I can tell Chrome installed fine.
>
> So I went ahead and did the upgrade, however it failed on the
>
Hi folks,
Not sure if anyone else has seen this. I just installed Google Chrome
and found that there were about 400 odd updates which I needed to
install. As far as I can tell Chrome installed fine.
So I went ahead and did the upgrade, however it failed on the
adobe-flashplugin package.
The
Rik Boland wrote:
> Spotify is letting people listen to their fav tracks, this is great!
>
> Surely this mean that you are able to capture these song and save them
> on one's hard drive. Would this not be a problem and is there open
> source software to achieve this?
>
> Shalom
>
I'd have tho
Rik Boland wrote:
> Spotify is letting people listen to their fav tracks, this is great!
>
> Surely this mean that you are able to capture these song and save them
> on one's hard drive. Would this not be a problem and is there open
> source software to achieve this?
Spotify, unfortunately, is
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 12:33 +0100, Stephen Garton wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:32 +0100, Stephen Garton wrote:
> > 2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
> > > Stephen Garton wrote:
> > >> 2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
> > >>
> > >>> Liam Wilson wrote:
> > >>>
> > Yeah, the speed on chrome compared to Firefox
2009/10/23 simon bennie :
> sure you can, but the question is, if you can listen to them any way why
> download them at all. You can even get spotify for mobile devices now.
>
> 2009/10/23 Rik Boland
>>
>> Spotify is letting people listen to their fav tracks, this is great!
>>
>> Surely this mean
2009/10/23 simon bennie :
> sure you can, but the question is, if you can listen to them any way why
> download them at all. You can even get spotify for mobile devices now.
>
> 2009/10/23 Rik Boland
>>
>> Spotify is letting people listen to their fav tracks, this is great!
>>
>> Surely this mean
sure you can, but the question is, if you can listen to them any way why
download them at all. You can even get spotify for mobile devices now.
2009/10/23 Rik Boland
> Spotify is letting people listen to their fav tracks, this is great!
>
> Surely this mean that you are able to capture these son
(Sorry for top posting, I'm on my phone)
Reinstalling will probably make no difference. You could try this command:
mv .mozilla/firefox .mozilla/firefox-old
This will move your profile so firefox will create a new one. If it works
with the new profile there is a problem with your original one.
--
Spotify is letting people listen to their fav tracks, this is great!
Surely this mean that you are able to capture these song and save them
on one's hard drive. Would this not be a problem and is there open
source software to achieve this?
Shalom
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:32 +0100, Stephen Garton wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
> > Stephen Garton wrote:
> >> 2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
> >>
> >>> Liam Wilson wrote:
> >>>
> Yeah, the speed on chrome compared to Firefox really is unreal, isn't
> it? Firefox seems horribly slow and clunky
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:32 +0100, Stephen Garton wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
> > Stephen Garton wrote:
> >> 2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
> >>
> >>> Liam Wilson wrote:
> >>>
> Yeah, the speed on chrome compared to Firefox really is unreal, isn't
> it? Firefox seems horribly slow and clunky
Hey, to return to my question -- how do I get Firefox to give me back
my buttons?
I could uninstall/reinstall from Synaptic and see if that did the
trick, but just wondering if anybody knew of a less drastic solution?
Sean
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/
Stephen Garton wrote:
>
> http://java.com/en/download/installed.jsp?detect=jre&try=1
>
> Tells me I have it installed, but I am assuming that it is using Java
> to detect that?
>
> I think facebook uses a Java applet for photo uploads, so I will give
> that a try when I get home (big no-no at work!
2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
> Stephen Garton wrote:
>> 2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
>>
>>> Liam Wilson wrote:
>>>
Yeah, the speed on chrome compared to Firefox really is unreal, isn't
it? Firefox seems horribly slow and clunky and unstable compared to the
google-chrome-unstable build.
>>>
Stephen Garton wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
>
>> Liam Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, the speed on chrome compared to Firefox really is unreal, isn't
>>> it? Firefox seems horribly slow and clunky and unstable compared to the
>>> google-chrome-unstable build.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Is Flash a
2009/10/23 Rob Beard :
> Liam Wilson wrote:
>> Yeah, the speed on chrome compared to Firefox really is unreal, isn't
>> it? Firefox seems horribly slow and clunky and unstable compared to the
>> google-chrome-unstable build.
>>
>>
> Is Flash and Java supported by Chrome?
>
> I'm interested in givi
Liam Wilson wrote:
> Yeah, the speed on chrome compared to Firefox really is unreal, isn't
> it? Firefox seems horribly slow and clunky and unstable compared to the
> google-chrome-unstable build.
>
>
Is Flash and Java supported by Chrome?
I'm interested in giving it a try (I must admit I ha
Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
> Stephen Garton wrote:
>
>> 2009/10/23 Sean Miller :
>>
>>
>>> Since yesterday's Jaunty update Firefox appears to have lost its
>>> history, "refresh" etc. buttons and only has the original domain in
>>> the address bar (ie. if I go to http://sitea.com and click o
Is this like what was reported with the Delphi compiler recently?
2009/10/23
> Daniel Drummond:
> > This reminds me of a story I heard a few years ago,
>
> [snip ken's evil compiler story]
>
> I had a paper related to that ("On Trusting Trust") somewhere ...
> rummage rummage ... ah, here we go.
Stephen Garton wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Sean Miller :
>
>> Since yesterday's Jaunty update Firefox appears to have lost its
>> history, "refresh" etc. buttons and only has the original domain in
>> the address bar (ie. if I go to http://sitea.com and click on links
>> within the address bar does not
Stephen Garton wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Sean Miller :
>
>> Since yesterday's Jaunty update Firefox appears to have lost its
>> history, "refresh" etc. buttons and only has the original domain in
>> the address bar (ie. if I go to http://sitea.com and click on links
>> within the address bar does not
Daniel Drummond:
> This reminds me of a story I heard a few years ago,
[snip ken's evil compiler story]
I had a paper related to that ("On Trusting Trust") somewhere ...
rummage rummage ... ah, here we go. "Countering Trusting Trust through
diverse double-compiling", David A. Wheeler.
http://www.
doug livesey wrote:
>
> I don't know the Enquirer -- how respected a journal is it?
It's the Inquirer at www.theinquirer.net
It was started by Mike Magee who was also involved with The Register
(www.theregister.co.uk). Both are fairly respected.
Rob
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
2009/10/23 Sean Miller :
> Since yesterday's Jaunty update Firefox appears to have lost its
> history, "refresh" etc. buttons and only has the original domain in
> the address bar (ie. if I go to http://sitea.com and click on links
> within the address bar does not change, even if I go to other sit
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Rowan Berkeley
wrote:
> Actually, the possessive pronoun WAS spelled with an apostrophe (which
> is quite logical, since others are) until the contraction for 'it is'
> became unavoidably common. Eighteenth-century printers wrote it with
> one; I know this because
Since yesterday's Jaunty update Firefox appears to have lost its
history, "refresh" etc. buttons and only has the original domain in
the address bar (ie. if I go to http://sitea.com and click on links
within the address bar does not change, even if I go to other sites -
rather like framed content).
28 matches
Mail list logo
