On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 03:36 AM, Mike Holstein wrote:
> i think this was just a miscommunication.
>
> i appreciate your through answer, and understand the points you make.
>
> the point i was making as to "why no one is uploading files to
> ubuntu(studio)", was, we dont really need to get coder
On 08/22/2015 10:24 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> Examples of other people taking initiative (not counting all):
> * madeinkobaua is art lead, though not very active. He takes command of
> the artwork.
> * Ross is mostly focused on fixing bugs and working on more general
> packaging for both Debian
I apologize for stepping in impromptu with perhaps yet another obvious
question mark on my forehead, without really understanding what is being
discussed, talking solely from a strong gut feeling.
When was the last time the ubuntustudio-dev-team had a meeting in the
physical realm?
*Set H.
--
u
On 2015-08-22 11:56, Set Hallstrom wrote:
> strong gut feeling.
> physical realm?
That came out wrong :D
>From the good side of the guts I'm talking about a friendly meeting,
coffee discussion, organisation etc... :D
Not a fist match for next boss or anything stupid, yeah :D:D
Yours,
Set
On 08/22/2015 12:00 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote:
> On 2015-08-22 11:56, Set Hallstrom wrote:
>> strong gut feeling.
>
>> physical realm?
>
> That came out wrong :D
>
>>From the good side of the guts I'm talking about a friendly meeting,
> coffee discussion, organisation etc... :D
>
> Not a fis
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 08/22/2015 12:00 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote:
> > On 2015-08-22 11:56, Set Hallstrom wrote:
> >> strong gut feeling.
> >
> >> physical realm?
> >
> > That came out wrong :D
> >
> >>From the good side of the guts I'm talking about a frien
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> The Linux Audio Conference would be a good place to meet up at though,
> if we were able to do that sometime.
>
Also, there's DebConf, which I have attended once. Though not directly
linked to Ubuntu Studio, there's a chance to meet up with
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:00:07 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
>Not a fist match for next boss or anything stupid, yeah :D:D
Are you sure that you are aware about what's going on in your mind?
Have you seen "Fight Club"? The guy wasn't aware about what's going on
in his mind.
Seemingly not a remake of
On 08/22/2015 12:41 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>> The Linux Audio Conference would be a good place to meet up at though,
>> if we were able to do that sometime.
>>
I have always wanted to go there.
>
> Also, there's DebConf, which I have attend
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 08/22/2015 12:41 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> >> The Linux Audio Conference would be a good place to meet up at though,
> >> if we were able to do that sometime.
> >>
>
> I have always
I have only used wubi to install Ubuntu, and my experience with that is
not exactly great. The virtual hard drive is really, really slow. I fear
that even if Ubuntu Studio works with wubi, it will give the user a bad
impression.
So, there's that too.
I could give it a try on a Win8 machine during
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> > On 08/22/2015 12:41 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> > >> The Linux Audio Conference would be a good place to meet up at though,
> >
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:44:39 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>So, to answer your question why some packages aren't making it into
>Ubuntu - no one seems interested enough to package them, or there is a
>problem with the package following Debian or Ubuntu policies. I really
>don't know which.
The Ubuntu
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 03:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:44:39 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> >So, to answer your question why some packages aren't making it into
> >Ubuntu - no one seems interested enough to package them, or there is a
> >problem with the package following Debi
Didn't
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2015-August/015757.html
just tell wubi has had only a simple "please reboot" functionality for
a long time, but causing confusion since it's still named wubi, and
all the documentation everywhere?
It's useful that there's a dialog popp
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> Didn't
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2015-August/015757.html
> just tell wubi has had only a simple "please reboot" functionality for
> a long time, but causing confusion since it's still named wubi, and
> all the d
phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called
multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove.
That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it?
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called
multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove.
That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it?
Is there a utility like dssi-host-jack for ladspa plugins to repla
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 07:23 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>
> > phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called
> > multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove.
> >
> > That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it?
The linked post or one of it's replies warns of "bricking windows," if it is
moved
off the disk, the exe file executed from the windows drive, and installer mode
selected. I have no idea if that is true or not, but be sure to do any testing
of this beyond the "reboot greeter" on an expendable in
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 19:38:15 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>As long as it is functional, it seems there is some reason to keep it.
>But, I can't try it until Monday, the earliest.
>
>If we keep it, we become maintainers and it will only exist in Ubuntu.
>That leaves us more time to figure out another s
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 03:36 AM, Mike Holstein wrote:
> > i think this was just a miscommunication.
> >
> > i appreciate your through answer, and understand the points you make.
> >
> > the point i was making as to "why no one is uploading f
22 matches
Mail list logo
