It seems there are a few packages that have been removed from Debian and
will be removed from Ubuntu as well, unless someone commits to
maintaining them.
The packages in question are:
jack-rack
lv2fil
specimen
phat
If anyone feels any of those should be kept, please let us know.
--
ubuntu-stud
Anyone feel any love for wubi at all?
If not, I will make sure it is removed from Ubuntu Studio at least. I'm
guessing it never worked for Ubuntu Studio anyway?
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Policy
This is a new page in the wiki. Already back when Scott was lead we were
talking about putting up this kind of page, and now it's finally in
place.
If you spot something being incorrect, or have any opinions of what is
written on that page, please tell.
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:25:36 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>jack-rack
This is a useful package and should be provided.
>lv2fil
Keep the package that provides Fons' 4-band parametric EQ, all other
EQs are anyway more or less useless. What filter is provided by this
package? However, even the more or
I don't usually comment here, but I though this is somewhat important.
lv2fil is no longer maintained and has been dropped from Debian.
Robin Gareus did a better replacement, fil4.lv2. See
https://github.com/x42/fil4.lv2
This is part of the x42-plugins package.
(fil4.lv2 uses the same base cod
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:25:36 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> >jack-rack
>
> This is a useful package and should be provided.
Is someone willing to maintain it?
And, if so, please look up why Debian is not doing it anymore.
--
ubuntu-studio-de
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Filipe Coelho wrote:
> I don't usually comment here, but I though this is somewhat important.
>
> lv2fil is no longer maintained and has been dropped from Debian.
> Robin Gareus did a better replacement, fil4.lv2. See
> https://github.com/x42/fil4.lv2
> This is
On 08/21/2015 12:43 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:25:36 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>>> jack-rack
>>
>> This is a useful package and should be provided.
>
> Is someone willing to maintain it?
> And, if so, please look up why
great, thanks !
Antoine THOMAS
Tél: 0663137906
2015-08-21 11:27 GMT+02:00 Kaj Ailomaa :
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Policy
>
> This is a new page in the wiki. Already back when Scott was lead we were
> talking about putting up this kind of page, and now it's finally in
> place.
>
> I
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
It seems there are a few packages that have been removed from Debian and
will be removed from Ubuntu as well, unless someone commits to
maintaining them.
The packages in question are:
jack-rack
lv2fil
x42's collection now has an expansion called fil4.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 03:07 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> > specimen
> There is a fork of this petri-foo that replaces this.
Replaced!
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> Anyone feel any love for wubi at all?
>
> If not, I will make sure it is removed from Ubuntu Studio at least. I'm
> guessing it never worked for Ubuntu Studio anyway?
>
> I have never used it, but seen questions when people have issues with i
Has anyone with a Windows box tested it lately?
On 8/21/2015 at 10:39 AM, "Jimmy Sjölund" wrote:
>
>On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Kaj Ailomaa
> wrote:
>
>> Anyone feel any love for wubi at all?
>>
>> If not, I will make sure it is removed from Ubuntu Studio at
>least. I'm
>> guessing it nev
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
Has anyone with a Windows box tested it lately?
Our upstairs windows have window boxes on them. There are flowers there.
On 8/21/2015 at 10:39 AM, "Jimmy Sjölund" wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Kaj Ailomaa
wrote:
Anyone f
On Thursday, August 20, 2015, C. F. Howlett wrote:
> As I understand it, wubi has not been supported, developed or upgraded for
> YEARS. Moreover, wubi is known to conflict with Ubuntu 13.XX and newer.
> So WHY is wubi not only present in the Ubuntu ecosystem, but actually
> packaged with Ubuntu
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015, at 09:51 PM, Mike Holstein wrote:
> > 15:48 < zequence> holstein: I really urge you to put your thoughts down
> > and
> > write an email instead
> > 15:48 < holstein> well, its fashionable to not like ubuntu.. and, thats
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Mike Holstein wrote:
>
> 15:48 < zequence> holstein: I really urge you to put your thoughts down
>> and write
>> an email instead
>> 15:48 < holstein> well, its fashionable to not like ubuntu.. and, thats
>> something large
There's enough buggy UEFI setups out there that I advise people to never buy
new anymore without searching the exact model they plan to buy online along
with the word "Ubuntu" and/or "Linux" to see what pops up. Long has this been
so for printers and wireless devices, not it's also true for laptop
All of the debates about "Ubuntu" and things like privacy only concern the Unity
DE and all that phone-centric stuff. UbuntuStudio, Xubuntu, Ubuntu MATE,
Kubuntu at all should be considered exempt. The only worry there is if they
will be around in the future if either Canonical runs into too much
19 matches
Mail list logo
