On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:14:20 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
>it is possible to [snip] build with phonehome disabled
Thank you Len,
but how can it be disabled?
I send a mail to
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2015-July/102010.html
and to a package maintainer of another distr
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:21:21 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
>One of the first things to do is install Wireshark, get it running
A long time ago I used wireshark successfully, but on my current
machine I only get it working to show the first action of enp3s0 (aka
eth0) and ppp0. The homepage
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:13:23 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:14:20 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
>>it is possible to [snip] build with phonehome disabled
>
>Thank you Len,
>
>but how can it be disabled?
--no-phone-home
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2015
It works for me, will show the Hushmail "keep alive" when running. All it shows
is the IP address, but plugging that one in brings up Hushmail. Has worked fine
on both Ubuntu Vivid and current Debian Unstable. for me.
On 7/13/2015 at 7:16 AM, "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
>
>On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:21:21
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:47:17 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:13:23 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:14:20 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
>>>it is possible to [snip] build with phonehome disabled
>>
>>Thank you Len,
>>
>>but how can it be disabled?
>
>--no-phone-
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:47:17 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:13:23 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >>On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:14:20 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
> >>>it is possible to [snip] build with phonehome disabled
> >>
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:02:43 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
>It works for me, will show the Hushmail "keep alive" when running. All
>it shows is the IP address, but plugging that one in brings up
>Hushmail. Has worked fine on both Ubuntu Vivid and current Debian
>Unstable. for me.
Hahah
Is the used /etc/resolv.conf a security risk?
I'm not using Google ;), but what I'm using might not be better than
Google.
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 62.109.121.2
nameserver 62.109.121.1
"8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4" -
http://askubuntu.com/questions/130452/how-do-i-add-a-dns-server-via-resolv-conf
6
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> Is the used /etc/resolv.conf a security risk?
>
> I'm not using Google ;), but what I'm using might not be better than
> Google.
>
you dont have to trust any authority.. you can just disable all that DNS
resolving, and just call the company
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:19:34 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote:
>just call the company up, and ask them for the IP..
>its really the only way to be certain, and not have to trust a 3rd
>party.. *then*, you get to wonder about the security of that phone
>call ;)
:D
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ub
On 13 July 2015 at 20:16, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Is the used /etc/resolv.conf a security risk?
>
> I'm not using Google ;), but what I'm using might not be better than
> Google.
>
FFS, not every 88 is a shorthand for Heil Hitler...
Those numbers are legit Google's public DNS services. Apparently
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:47:53 +0100, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>On 13 July 2015 at 20:16, Ralf Mardorf
>wrote:
>
>> Is the used /etc/resolv.conf a security risk?
>>
>> I'm not using Google ;), but what I'm using might not be better than
>> Google.
>>
>
>FFS, not every 88 is a shorthand for Heil Hitler.
I look at all the packets, never realized Wireshark could resolve remote names,
thus the manual plugging of all IP addresses seen into the browser.
On 7/13/2015 at 3:02 PM, "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
>
>On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:02:43 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>It works for me, will show the
13 matches
Mail list logo
