Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apache2
Setting up apache2.2-common (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) ...
chmod: invalid mode: `root'
Try `chmod --help' for more information.
dpkg: error processing apache2.2-common (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit stat
Hrm, so now how do I set the severity in LP? This is critical.
If this wents from proposed to updates, we have a problem.
--
hardy-proposed (2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16) uninstallable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583698
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, w
@Dave: Old install of hardy (these are our desktop systems at work), which got
upgraded (as it is, daily).
My machine has proposed in sources.list as I’m the admin in charge of them.
@Colin: Yes, -x’ing apache was intentional, to have it installed/usable
but not enabled by default.
** Changed in
@Dave: I agree, but please make sure that the package version which gives me
the issue
does not propagate to hardy-updates because otherwise I may have several dozen
angry
people on me.
Changing the affected line to
chmod `dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/apache2 | cut -d' ' -f 3`
/us
Thank you *VERY MUCH* for breaking a lot of our computers now.
Now I know why we’re still using Kubuntu.
The priority of this bug ought to be raised to critical now, as the
next upgrade on many of our machines will fail:
r...@bkix:~ # apt-cache policy apache2.2-common
Can’t have been this hard… the attached debdiff fixes the issue for me.
I’ve deployed that in our internal repo right now, thanks again for all
the breakage.
** Patch added: "debdiff fixing this issue, for Hardy, tested"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50002725/apache2_2.2.8-1ubuntu0.16tarent1.d
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: php5
$ apt-cache policy php5-cli
php5-cli:
Installed: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11
Candidate: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11
Version table:
*** 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.11 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
5.2.4
As you can see in LP: #583698, helping out in testing does not get us bugs
fixed,
au contraire, it raises the level of annoyance at people ignoring the bugs
reported.
Anyway, I’m only tunning on proposed because then I can catch things like this
before they affect my cow-orkers… no Sybase here.
Yeah, works for me, thanks!
tgl...@tglase:~ $ sudo env LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Starting
Starting 2
Done
Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
apache2 apache2-doc apache2
Public bug reported:
Regression in hardy-proposed: ssh-vulnkey disappeared:
openssh (1:4.7p1-8ubuntu2) hardy-proposed; urgency=low
* Backport from upstream:
- Only listen for IPv6 connections on AF_INET6 sockets (LP: #713002).
-- Colin Watson Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:49:01 +
openssh (1
ssh-vulnkey and ssh’ing out WFM too. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002
Title:
Impossible to disable IPv4
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-serv
Hi all,
this bug has been brought to my attention by my boss today.
If I understand the situation correctly, the problem is:
• OpenLDAP links against GnuTLS (gnutls26)
• gnutls26 links against gcrypt, which has the bug
• gnutls28 links against nettle, but also gmp which is LGPLv3+
• OpenLDAP thus
Ah right, there would be the usecase of LDAP with SSL used by
non-GPL-compatible programmes.
So the proper fix is to have three sets of LDAP (client) libraries. The rest of
the packages (server
and utilities) can then be built against whatever of those the maintainers see
best fit.
--
You rece
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #658739
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658739
** Also affects: gnutls26 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658739
Importance:
Try:
sudo dpkg -a --configure
Or:
sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/pax_*.deb
Or:
sudo apt-get install --reinstall pax
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to pax in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527882
Title
** Changed in: pax (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to pax in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527882
Title:
package pax 1:20120606-2+deb7u1 failed to install/upgrade: packag
mailman and openssh-server are the two failing packages
** Also affects: mailman (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gforge (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this
not in Fusionforge but in BIND
** Package changed: gforge (Ubuntu) => bind9 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765897
Title:
package gforge-dns-bind9 4.8.2-1 fai
** Patch added: "debdiff fixing this issue"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39211564/kvm_84%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu12.4%7Ehardy1tarent1.debdiff
--
fails to install due to differing kernel versions between installer and
installee
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522074
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kvm-source
The version of the kernel used by the Kubuntu Installer and the version of the
kernel
that actually gets installed differ. When adding kvm-source during the
installation,
for example via a preseed late-command using in-target, it fails to con
Considering I mentioned hardy-backports, and the filename of the debdiff is
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39211564/kvm_84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.4~hardy1tarent1.debdiff
that should’ve been obvious ;-)
We’re using hardy with hardy-backports.
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Public bug reported:
Both hardy-updates and hardy-security contain libsasl2-modules
2.1.22.dfsg1-18ubuntu2.1
whereas hardy contained libsasl2-modules 2.1.22.dfsg1-18ubuntu2 (according to
a-c policy).
When installing a fresh system with security already included (after all, no
need to first ins
Yes, the new “pax” archive format, and some of the new -o options, are
not supported. This utility is compatible with an older version of
POSIX.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to pax in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
23 matches
Mail list logo
