Public bug reported:
Debian #673038 was fixed in wheezy but the fix has never been merged to
Ubuntu. I verified the existence of this bug in precise, quantal,
raring, and saucy using more or less the procedure from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673038#111:
# apt-get install lda
** Description changed:
Debian #673038 was fixed in wheezy but the fix has never been merged to
Ubuntu. I verified the existence of this bug in precise, quantal,
raring, and saucy using more or less the procedure from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673038#111:
# apt-
Tried to propose a branch. New to this UDD thing, please give me hints
if I've done some part incorrectly. Tested the fix on saucy amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Thanks James. Added SRU info in the description, will propose SRU merges
as I have time to prepare and test them...
** Description changed:
+ SRU justification:
+
+ [Impact]
+
+ The slapd tools (slapcat, slapadd, et al) don't retry after failing to
+ acquire a BDB read lock, and on a busy LDAP
** Patch added: "raring debdiff, tested on amd64"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1185908/+attachment/3694556/+files/openldap_2.4.31-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap
** Patch added: "precise debdiff, tested on amd64"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1185908/+attachment/3694554/+files/openldap_2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.3.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openl
Note to sponsors/SRU team: the impact of this bug is limited to slapd
only and I really don't expect people to be running LDAP servers on
quantal or raring: therefore I think it's most important to fix this in
precise, less so for those others.
** Tags added: patch precise quantal raring
--
You
** Patch added: "quantal debdiff, tested on amd64"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1185908/+attachment/3694555/+files/openldap_2.4.31-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openlda
Hi,
(I'm allowed to verify my own bugs, right?)
Verified on precise and raring, i386 and amd64.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 652433 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652433
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 652433
Init script dependency error: krb5-kdc starts before slapd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
Apologies for the inconvenience. Attaching fixed (and tested) patches.
** Patch added: "utopic patch v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1392018/+attachment/4420526/+files/openldap_2.4.31-1%2Bnmu2ubuntu11.2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Patch added: "vivid patch v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1392018/+attachment/4420527/+files/openldap_2.4.31-1%2Bnmu2ubuntu12.2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubunt
The slapd package in wily now provides the pw-sha2 module.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #626911
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626911
** Also affects: openldap (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626911
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
This was reported upstream as ITS#6849, and fixed in OpenLDAP 2.4.25.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
The dpkg terminal output unfortunately doesn't show why slapd failed to
start. Please check /var/log/syslog for the relevant slapd output.
You mentioned you installed Samba-4. If you are running Samba's AD DC,
that would probably bind the LDAP port (389/tcp), which would prevent
slapd from startin
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:26:30AM -, Adhi Dazz wrote:
>I've reinstall samba4 from apt-get method (backward to Samba Version
>4.1.6-Ubuntu), and the problem fixed.
OK, and what do you have running on port 389 right now, samba or slapd?
(one way to find this: sudo netstat -lntp | grep -w 389)
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:25:57AM -, Adhi Dazz wrote:
>this is the result of port 389
># sudo netstat -lntp | grep -w 389
>tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:389 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> 1219/samba
>tcp6 0 0 :::389 :::* LIST
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Tandy (rtandy)
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
Based on the dpkg log:
dpkg-deb (alfolyamat): decompressing archive member: lzma error:
compressed data is corrupt
it sounds like the package you downloaded was incomplete, or got
corrupted somehow. Please delete the downloaded packages:
sudo apt-get clean
and try the installation again.
** Ch
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471831
Title:
Requesting a package for 2.4.41
To manage notifi
Hi Kartik,
To help me reproduce and verify this, can you describe your setup where
slapd stores its credentials in the KCM?
I'm asking because I do see these denials, but they don't appear to
affect operation with a keytab, and I haven't been able to get slapd to
work without a keytab. I'm guessi
Hi sponsors,
Please review the attached merge of openldap from Debian unstable.
Thanks in advance.
** Attachment added: "openldap_2.4.41+dfsg-1ubuntu1_source.changes"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471831/+attachment/4433779/+files/openldap_2.4.41%2Bdfsg-1ubuntu1_source.changes
** Attach
With slapd from vivid-updates:
# dpkg-query -W slapd
slapd 2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu12.1
# ldapwhoami -H ldapi:// -QY EXTERNAL
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Can't contact LDAP server (-1)
With slapd from vivid-proposed:
# dpkg-query -W slapd
slapd 2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu12.2
# ldapwhoami -H ldapi:// -
Thanks for the report. I guess apt has gotten confused since you had to
reboot in the middle of the upgrade. I don't know that there's anything
I can do about it from openldap's end, though.
** Package changed: openldap (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Please read https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ShellGlobbing to
understand how your shell interprets the * character.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openlda
Thanks for the bug report.
The dpkg log says:
Configurando slapd (2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu12.2) ...
Creating new user openldap... done.
Creating initial configuration... done.
Creating LDAP directory... done.
insserv: warning: script 'K01centrify-kcm' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: scri
Hi,
It does not look like an openldap bug to me:
dpkg: error processing package libgcrypt11:i386 (--configure):
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should
reinstall it before attempting configuration
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libldap-2.4-2:i386:
libldap-2.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 112631 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112631
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1011227
package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Th
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 112631 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112631
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 112631
slapd failed to install/upgrade: database (dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xx) not
configured to hold "dc=nodomain"
--
You received this bug notification because yo
** Summary changed:
- [apport] package slapd failed to install/upgrade:
+ slapd failed to install/upgrade: database (dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xx) not
configured to hold "dc=nodomain"
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #546368
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546368
** Also affec
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 112631 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112631
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 112631
[apport] package slapd failed to install/upgrade:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subsc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 112631 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112631
Thanks dino99, but this one is still relevant and does need to be fixed.
We should keep it open.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #5
Fixed in natty and later, looks like.
openldap (2.4.23-5) unstable; urgency=high
[...]
* debian/slapd.scripts-common, debian/slapd.postinst: on upgrade from
versions <= 2.4.23-4, explicitly grant access to cn=Subschema, which
otherwise is blocked by our added olcAccess settings. Closes:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 112631 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112631
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 112631
slapd failed to install/upgrade: database (dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xx) not
configured to hold "dc=nodomain"
--
You received this bug notification because yo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 112631 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112631
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 112631
slapd failed to install/upgrade: database (dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xx) not
configured to hold "dc=nodomain"
--
You received this bug notification because yo
caused by:
Preparing to replace slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.5 (using
.../slapd_2.4.23-6ubuntu6_amd64.deb) ...
Dumping to /var/backups/slapd-2.4.21-0ubuntu5.5:
Unpacking replacement slapd ...
Would need a copy of the config before the upgrade in order to determine
why the database was not listed for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862520 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862520
>From the upgrade log:
Setting up slapd (2.4.23-6ubuntu6) ...
Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.d in /var/backups/slapd-2.4.21-0ubuntu5.4... done.
Moving old database directories to /var/backups:
Loading from
There isn't enough information (would need debconf info) to say for
sure, but this is most likely caused by slapd/domain ending with a dot,
or otherwise causing olcSuffix to end up containing an unacceptable
character. The former case has been fixed in wily and later.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubun
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862520 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862520
** Summary changed:
- package slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
+ slapd failed to upgrade: no databases were backed
Public bug reported:
Please merge openldap 2.4.42+dfsg-2 (main) from Debian testing (main)
** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Ryan Tandy (rtandy)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Tandy (rta
/+files/openldap_2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ryan Tandy (rtandy) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Sounds like a case of multi-arch skew. If I'm reading correctly, you had
libldap-2.4-2 2.4.41+dfsg-1ubuntu2 installed for both i386 and amd64;
but then you tried to upgrade to -1ubuntu3 on i386 only.
Updating your system should resolve this, I think.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status
Hi Ian,
I found https://stathers.net/2016/01/14/thawte-premium-ssl-
md5-gnutls.html but it would be surprising if that broke syncrepl but
not ldapsearch. Still, worth checking if you haven't already.
(ldapsearch and syncrepl are using the same CA certificate, right?)
Is there any interesting outp
Please also have a look at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls26/+bug/1534230 (thanks
to sarnold for the pointer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537762
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1040177 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040177
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1040177
slapd install fails when requesting to 'Omit OpenLDAP server configuration"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
There is a debconf question about purge:
Template: slapd/purge_database
Type: boolean
Default: false
Description: Do you want the database to be removed when slapd is purged?
Note that false is the default. Was it changed to true before purging?
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Co
Hi Michal,
Thanks for the report. Can I ask you to provide some more information?
The output from the following commands would be very helpful:
lsb_release -a
uname -a
apt-cache policy
apt-get -y install slapd
apt-get -y -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=1 install slapd
** Changed in: openldap (U
> Investigating (0) slapd [i386] 2.4.40-4 ~ ~ ubuntu14.04.1
c42.ppa1> (net)
This package (slapd 2.4.40-4~ubuntu14.04.1~c42.ppa1) is not part of
Ubuntu. It comes from one of the PPAs you have installed:
https://launchpad.net/~dirk-computer42/+archive/ubuntu/c42-backport
This is either a problem w
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:56:59PM -, Michal Dziczkowski wrote:
>I don't have the mantioned PPA in my repositories, so how could I
>install slapd from it?
The 'apt-cache policy' output you posted does include it.
> 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/dirk-computer42/c42-backport/ubuntu/ trusts /
>
from DpkgTerminalLog:
Setting up slapd (2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3) ...
Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.d in /var/backups/slapd-2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8.2...
done.
Moving old database directories to /var/backups:
Backup path /var/backups/dc=nodomain-2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8.2.ldapdb
exists. Giving up...
The
Might be related to bug 781737. pam-ldap/nss-ldap dropping privileges
is, AFAIK, caused by libgcrypt (bug 423252). If this is the same bug,
then the pending openldap merge (bug 1395098) will resolve it, as gcrypt
will no longer be used. But switching to nss-pam-ldapd is a good
recommendation anyway
Hi,
We are going to do another Debian upload to fix two bugs described here:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/06/3
I'll rebase this merge on top of that once it's finalized.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscrib
)
Assignee: Ryan Tandy (rtandy) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395098
** Attachment added: "openldap_2.4.40-4ubuntu1.dsc"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1395098/+attachment/4324360/+files/openldap_2.4.40-4ubuntu1.dsc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug repo
** Patch added: "openldap_2.4.40-4ubuntu1.diff.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1395098/+attachment/4324361/+files/openldap_2.4.40-4ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug r
Unsubscribed sponsors for now. Needs rebasing again for Ubuntu changes,
and there will probably be another Debian upload too. I'll try again for
W.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Tandy (rtandy)
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirm
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1103353 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103353
Hi, thanks for the report. This is already a known bug and fixed
upstream in newer versions, so marking as a duplicate.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1103353
Invalid GnuTLS cipher suite
The fixed version is not in Ubuntu yet. This crash only happens on
invalid configurations, though; slapd will still refuse to start on such
a configuration. Fix your configuration to be correct, and you won't see
the crash any more.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:40:06PM -, Jouko Orava wrote:
>rtandy, this is not specific to slapd, but affects all applications that
>use libldap2 and gnutls.
Apologies for the lack of context. You're completely correct, but the
message I was replying to was about slapd specifically: he had jus
Thanks for the report. I guess this is caused by
https://bugs.debian.org/330695 which is not fixed yet. :/
Easy to reproduce by installing libldap-2.4-2:amd64, removing (but not
purging) it, and then trying to install :i386.
Klaus: in this case a workaround is probably to purge the old packages
(
Patches were accepted upstream, will be fixed in 2.4.41.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393306
Title:
slapd: nssov does not work with lib{nss,pam}-ldapd 0.9.x
To
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #663644
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663644
** Also affects: openldap (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663644
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
IIRC slapd does try to create the directory, but it's already switched
users by that point, so doesn't have sufficient privileges.
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
branches/ubuntu/vivid/openldap/vivid/view/head:/contrib/slapd-
modules/nssov/nssov.c#L808
I don't know whether the overlay has a
Thinking about it again, an upstream fix for this is unlikely. slapd
changes users before it even starts loading its config, so there
probably isn't any way for nssov to mkdir as root.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ope
Hello,
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:25:06PM -, Felipe Reyes wrote:
>Here I'm attaching a new version of the patch for precise that includes
>fixes for CVE-2012-1164, CVE-2013-4449 and CVE-2015-1545
The precise debdiff adds d/p/0001-ITS-7723-fix-reference-counting.patch
which is the same as CVE
** Tags added: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1392018
Title:
apparmor stops /var/run/ldapi from being read causing ldap to fail
To manage notifications ab
Hello,
Your dpkg log says:
Loading the initial configuration from the ldif file () failed with
the following error while running slapadd:
slapadd: dn="cn=module{0},cn=config" (line=1034): (65) unrecognized
objectClass 'olcModuleList'
That object class is hard-coded in slapd (in servers/slap
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452087
Title:
slapd [or its init script] does not create necessary
Hello,
I can't reproduce this bug in precise.
I added an entry with slapadd:
# slapadd << eof
dn: uid=a,ou=b,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: account
^D
Error, entries missing!
entry 3: ou=b,dc=example,dc=com
then started slapd, then tried to add the parent entry:
# ldapadd -x -D cn=admin,dc=e
Hello,
This appears to have been related to the smbkrb5pwd overlay (which I
would note is not packaged in Ubuntu):
Preparing to replace slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.4 (using
.../slapd_2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8_amd64.deb) ...
* Stopping OpenLDAP slapd
...done.
Dumping to /var/backups/slapd-2.4.28-1.1
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Tandy (rtandy)
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
Hello,
The log says:
Configurazione di slapd (2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8)...
Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.d in /var/backups/slapd-2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu3...
done.
Moving old database directories to /var/backups:
- directory dc=nodomain... done.
Loading from /var/backups/slapd-2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu3:
Hello Peter,
I don't have a natty chroot any more, but as far back as precise,
preseeding slapd/domain does set the suffix of the default DIT, and
there is a debconf prompt for it too, at medium priority.
Marking the bug fixed, but please correct me if you meant something
different.
** Changed i
It looks like very recent GnuTLS releases (>= 3.3.6) may have finally
added the API needed to make this possible:
https://www.happyassassin.net/2015/01/12/a-note-about-ssltls-trusted-
certificate-stores-and-platforms/
http://gnutls.org/manual/html_node/X509-certificate-API.html#index-
gnutls_005f
** Patch added: "debdiff | filterdiff -i '*/debian/*'"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1395098/+attachment/4404462/+files/openldap_2.4.31-1%2Bnmu2ubuntu12_2.4.40%2Bdfsg-1ubuntu1.debian.debdiff
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee
Hello sponsors, hello server team,
(OK, let's try this again...)
Here is an updated rebase of openldap on to current Debian unstable.
A test build can be seen in my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~rtandy/+archive/ubuntu/lp1395098
orig.tar.gz can be downloaded from there too:
https://launchpad.net/~
** Attachment added: "openldap_2.4.40+dfsg-1ubuntu1.dsc"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1395098/+attachment/4404460/+files/openldap_2.4.40%2Bdfsg-1ubuntu1.dsc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
** Patch added: "openldap_2.4.40+dfsg-1ubuntu1.diff.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1395098/+attachment/4404461/+files/openldap_2.4.40%2Bdfsg-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
oh, for crying out loud. I added "* Enable the mdb backend again on
ppc64el ...", but didn't drop " * Disable mdb backend ..." from the
"Remaining changes" section... :)
leaving it alone for now, anyway, in case a reviewer spots something
else I need to fix.
--
You received this bug notificatio
Based on reading apparmor code and changes, it sounds like changing 'w'
to 'rw' actually is the correct fix (f.ex. [1]). My proposed merge (bug
1395098) includes that change.
This should probably be SRUed to U and V after getting fixed in the
development release. Considering that ldapi is our defa
** Patch added: "vivid patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1392018/+attachment/4406776/+files/openldap_2.4.31-1%2Bnmu2ubuntu12.2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
- There is a bug in slapd that triggers the profile of apparmor of slapd.
+ [Impact]
- When installing a clean ubuntu 14.10 server and installing slapd with :
- apt-get install slapd ldap-utils
- configure it with :
- dpkg-reconfigure slapd
- with ldap address of ldapi:/
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:36:04AM -, Massé wrote:
>Hello! I have a problem with the vivid patch
>
>sudo patch -p1 < ../openldap_2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu12.debdiff
>bash: ../openldap_2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu12.debdiff: Aucun fichier ou dossier de
>ce type
That's not a problem with the patch. That's bas
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 07:28:44AM -, Moritz wrote:
>I try to apply the vivid patch, but don't seem to have openldap
>installed, only slapd – is that the same?
openldap is the source package. slapd is one of the binary packages
built from it.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/vivid/openldap
libldap-2.4-2 is a system library, required by a lot of applications and
other libraries. I don't think this would be considered a bug. Why do
you want to remove it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
ht
The relevant part of the upgrade log:
Setting up slapd (2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8) ...
Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.d in /var/backups/slapd-2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu3...
done.
Moving old database directories to /var/backups:
- directory dc=ec,dc=oceanit,dc=com... done.
Loading from /var/backups/slapd-
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #709472
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709472
** Also affects: openldap (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709472
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
Fix committed upstream, will be released in 2.4.40.
http://www.openldap.org/devel/gitweb.cgi?p=openldap.git;a=commit;h=7350a52adacb5f258925b14d2bc5136c8f4ddd9b
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https:/
Hi Rod,
Did yours also fail with "Directory /var/lib/ldap for dc=example,dc=com
not empty, aborting.", like Frank's did? What's left in /var/lib/ldap
after that failed upgrade?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap i
Hi Rod,
As Frank's upgrade failure was related to the message I quoted, if you
didn't see that then chances are you have a different bug. Can you
search the log files in /var/log/dist-upgrade for "Setting up slapd" and
post the messages after that, like in my quote above? That will tell us
which p
Hi Rod,
Not sure about the fontconfig warnings, but I assume they're to do
with your configuration as I don't see such warnings using the default
setup.
As far as openldap:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:21 AM, rod wrote:
> Setting up slapd (2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu3) ...
> Fontconfig warning: "/etc/font
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:13 AM, rod wrote:
> Thought my settings were default anyway. How can I find out?
I'm not sure, but I think debsums might be able to tell you.
> Any way to make sure the upgrade succeeded? I repeatedly did get an
> error message + subsequent failure to report.
Try the
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:14 PM, rod wrote:
>Backup path
> /var/backups/dc=georchestra,dc=org-2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu3.ldapdb exists.
> Giving up...
That's a leftover from a previous failed upgrade, when your existing
database was backed up but it failed before restoring it. Better keep
it safe.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:14 AM, rod wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> Sorry I missed your email.
>
> Things were blocking and I really had to move forward.
> I therefore opted for an fresh install.
> Everything went well, obviously.
>
> But this means that we'll probably never know the origin of the problem
Did anyone ever forward this to Debian?
The patch seems reasonable to me. I don't know of any situation where
bdb/hdb/mdb create subdirectories under /var/lib/ldap, only files.
I've committed this to the pkg-openldap Git repository. Thanks for the
patch!
** Also affects: openldap (Debian)
Imp
There's an open request (for a long time) for a backport in Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/685748
A backport should address the question of DB format upgrades when going
from release to release. The technique currently used, checking the
version of the package being upgraded, will fail if a newer
Hi,
as per the upstream changelog ITS#6548/#7092 were fixed upstream in
2.4.27, so Fix Released in precise and newer.
thanks,
Ryan
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #643970
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643970
** Changed in: openldap (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Hi Christopher,
The error message you reported:
olcDbDirectory: value #0: invalid path: No such file or directory
is also not the same one this bug is about, and your message doesn't
include enough information to tell what caused it. Would you please file
a separate bug report about that? Make s
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Jason N <908...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> I don't see a version anywhere close to 4.0.17 available to me on 12.04 LTS.
Jörg has recently uploaded ipmitool 1.8.14 and foomatic-filters 4.0.17
to Debian, so I guess that's a typo.
Jörg, if you are reading this: ple
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
