** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #667999
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667999
** Also affects: bind9 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667999
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Also affects: samba4 (Debian) via
http://bug
Something killed bzr earlier, and there is still an open lock for it.
You might want to run "sudo bzr break-lock /etc".
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Converted to question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/etckeeper/+question/202609
--
You re
This is a samba-common issue, since the samba4 postinst script gets the
workgroup from samba-common's debconf config - and that has invalid
data.
** Package changed: samba4 (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is s
Hi Abhi,
wrt (1); the realm should usually be the uppercased version of the DNS domain
name, not the NetBIOS domain name.
(2) is fixed in newer versions of samba4, those present in quantal.
You can install samba4 as something other than a DC by selecting
"standalone" in debconf. The priority of
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075456
Title:
wrong path given in README
Note that samba4 build-depends on some packages that are not in main,
most notably subunit (MIR @ bug 780767), heimdal and libparse-yapp-perl.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Summary changed:
- error is displayed if no changes are good to commit on post-install
+ [bzr] error when encountering large file
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Summary changed:
- Update Manager can not proceed if there is a lock on /etc
+ [bzr] breaks with locks on /etc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800656
Title:
[bz
** Branch linked: lp:~jelmer/ubuntu/raring/etckeeper/merge-0.64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482986
Title:
Tracks some unnecessary/autogenerated files
To manage
** Summary changed:
- etckeeper tries/fails to autocommit on clean trees with shelved changes
+ [bzr] tries/fails to autocommit on clean trees with shelved changes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
ht
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075456
Title:
wrong path given in README
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in
Is this really necessary - hostname is Essential, isn't it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822613
Title:
etckeeper should depend on hostname
To manage notificatio
Reassigning - Samba does not provide any DBus interfaces, and gvfsd-smb-
browse is part of gvfs.
While the latter uses libsmbclient (which is part of Samba) I have not
seen any indication that this would in fact be a bug in libsmbclient.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => nautilus (Ubuntu)
--
Are you sure you meant to mark this bug as a dupe? It's certainly a bug
in the samba source package and not in smbldap-tools (which doesn't ship
the schema file).
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 684225
missing samba.schema
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Hi giox069,
That's a different issue than this bug (which is already fixed). Can you
please file a separate bug report about that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Kylepablo, this bug was fixed in 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2, so a version
newer than what you are running.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd fails to start
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 20:49 +, Paul Tansom wrote:
> Is there a fix for 10.04 LTS, which only runs 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.4? I
> don't often reboot my server, but invariably forget to check that nmbd
> is running when I do!
There is no fix for Maverick yet, but according to the Launchpad page
Chu
libpam-smbpass doesn't have anything to do with whether or not your
computer will show up in the local network, I think that is a red
herring.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 18:23 +, Cypher2 wrote:
> Still happening in natty amd64
>
> I have to start nmbd manually for full network share (load and
> access)...
>
> using the mkdir -p fix did not resolve...
I suspect you're hitting a different issue, please file a separate bug report.
Cheers,
Please open a different bug report; although it's related, it's a
different issue.
Nice catch, btw.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd fails to start o
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:02 +, Johan Fornander wrote:
> The source code in the official samba git (source/lib/util.c) seems to
> use HOST_NAME_MAX and I found an inconsistency in the code base:
>
> source/lib/replace/replace.h:
> 384 #ifndef HOST_NAME_MAX
> 385 #define HOST_NAME_MAX 255
>
>
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 13:28 +, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> Okay, I think I've found the issue, based on a crash with liferea:-
>
> At wins.c:95, we have
> DEBUGLEVEL = 0;
>
> Somewhere in source3/include/debug.h, we have
> #define DEBUGLEVEL *debug_level
> extern int DEBUGLEVEL;
>
> In source3/l
Nobody is actively working on this bug, either in Ubuntu or upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17829
Title:
swat rewrites fields incorrectly
--
Ubuntu-server-b
libverto or libevent don't provide integration for talloc, which is one
of the key features of libtevent.
At the very least you would need a wrapper layer in libldb and sssd
around libevent or libverto.
Samba 4/OpenChange/Evolution-mapi (in universe) also rely on tevent and
the fact that libldb u
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #651168
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651168
** Also affects: etckeeper (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651168
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
assigned) => Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Package changed: etckeeper (Ubuntu) => bzr (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to et
Why did you end up with a pending lock - was there another "bzr commit"
instance still active for /etc?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800656
Title:
Update Manager
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9
Bazaar can indeed create hardlinks when it creates a checkout (so can
e.g. git) but it doesn't explicitly version the fact that hardlinks
exist somewhere. The warning here is about the latter category.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug no
The new feature flags feature might be useful for this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322327
Title:
Integrated permissions/ownership diff output for etckeeper/bzr
Hi Timo, Jamie,
On 02/10/2012 08:22 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Jamie, thank you for the review!
>
> Debian will have 1.5.16 as soon as I've passed the Debian Maintainership
> process, if not uploaded by a sponsor earlier. I'm also hopeful that
> squeeze will get 1.8.x which is what I'm preparing f
On 02/10/2012 09:30 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Jelmer, that would be great. I'll ping you early next week. Ding-libs
> needs to go first and sssd after that.
Cool - I'm 'jelmer' on IRC.
> ps. I have a whole lot of other packages too if you're interested to
> sponsor them (389ds, freeipa related) ;)
Re-opening - this bug is still open upstream, and while there have been
changes in this area of the code I'm pretty sure none of them have
affected the rewriting of fields in SWAT.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because
Thanks for the bug report.
Ideal would indeed be to update the tutorial to use bzr.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Serv
Can you attach your smb.conf? That way we should be able to see if this
is a bug in the configuration dialog or Samba.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945117
Title:
can
Sorry, my bad. I meant the usershare file that was created by the
nautilus plugin.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945117
Title:
can't edit files in my public guest all
I don't think deja-dup should support SMB urls as it doesn't use gvfs as
far as I can tell.
You should indeed be able to use mount.cifs to mount the share, but that
doesn't involve Samba, just the cifs kernel module.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
--
You received this bug notifica
What does 'netstat -l' say, does it list anything for smbd and nmbd?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951087
Title:
Samba non-functional on boot.
To manage notification
Sorry, 'netstat -lp'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951087
Title:
Samba non-functional on boot.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
** Also affects: samba (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662243
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: samba
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: samba
Status: Fix Committed => New
** Changed in: samba
Remote watch: Debia
nautilus is using libsmbclient, which is a part of Samba.
mount.cifs is unrelated to Samba; the mount utilities itself are a part
of the cifs-utils package, the actual implementation lives in the
kernel.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in
Ideally we should have provision generate /etc/samba/named.conf.samba or
something alone those lines instead; this would make it unnecessary to
provide custom apparmor rules for the configuration file. It would be
nice if bind provided some sort of mechanism that allowed external
applications to in
Hi Tyler,
+1 on the diff, that looks good.
Note that an alternative to shipping the second patch is to update the
generated files from the package itself, so the diff isn't massive; this
would require adding "make -C source3 samba3-idl" as part of the build
step and adding libparse-yapp-perl to t
Hi Thomas, why the prefix? This is already associated with the samba4
package.
** Summary changed:
- samba4: integrate with bind package
+ integrate with bind package
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
ht
This happens because samba-common doesn't read the workgroup from
smb.conf.
can you try running "debconf-show samba-common" ?
** Summary changed:
- installation successfull but package still complains
+ samba-common doesn't read workgroup from smb.conf
** Package changed: samba4 (Ubuntu) => sa
If you're referring to the alternatives files - Debian package -9 fixes
the cleanup of those.
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317534
Title:
del_enctype causes ipropd-slave crash
To manage not
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440381
Ti
This is available upstream in Dovecot, so not a bug there.
** Changed in: dovecot
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235401
Title:
[needs
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1138905
Title:
managesieve segfault
To manage notifications
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235372
Title:
managesieve skipping of CRLF at end of AUTHENTIC
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Aaron J. Zirbes (ajz) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
This was fixed in 3.5, long since available in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453747
Title:
Is this an ubuntu specific issue? subunit2junitxml on Debian just use
#!/usr/bin/python - in other words, Python 2.
** Changed in: subunit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to subuni
** Also affects: subunit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: subunit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: subunit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, whic
What appears to be happening is that the first time nmbd gets run
testparm fails (because pid dir /var/run/samba doesn't exist yet) so
nmbd is not started.
After that smbd gets run and its pre-init will create /var/run/samba. So
the next time nmbd's pre-init script will work.
--
nmbd fails to st
It looks like the creation of /var/run/samba should happen earlier in
the script.
What about the attached patch?
--
nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
** Package changed: etckeeper (Ubuntu) => bzr-webdav (Ubuntu)
--
not installing http[s]+webdav
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676418
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 20:52 +, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
> It should be:
> mkdir -p /var/run/samba
>
> Otherwise if the directory already exists it won't be able to start. So
> mkdir -p will start in all conditions.
I'm pretty sure "install -d" exits with success if the directory alread
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694953
Title:
missing i386 libraries on amd64
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailin
Yes, that's a regression... it is due to the order in which directories
are created at startup. There's an existing bug report about it, I don't
recall the number.
Cypher2 wrote:
>but the point is that it does not not start automatically like it used to..
>I have to call nmbd manually on every s
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 596064 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 596064
nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart
* You can subscribe to bug 596064 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sourc
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648609
Title:
unable to unmount broken cifs mount
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mail
As far as I know this call needs a NetBIOS name, so I don't think this
is a bug or a regression. Does "smbclient -I -L "
work ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944
Ti
** Tags added: upstart
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652065
Title:
dhclient hook assumes wrong service name ("samba" instead of "smbd")
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailin
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620322
Title:
stale cifs mount can't be unmounted: "This utility only unmounts
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260396
Title:
cifs.mount: mapchars + utf8 = loop
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs maili
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117730
Title:
cannot use sqlite3 on cifs mount
--
Ubuntu-server-b
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117727
Title:
cifs mounts: unable to move dangling symlinks (case o
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620382
Title:
smbmount allows mounting the same ressource multiple times on th
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539791
Title:
mount.cifs cannot mount a DFS share when using Kerberos authenti
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427896
Title:
Cannot unmount a windows network share.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
Please note that cifsfs is not in the "smbfs" package but partially in
the kernel and partially in "cifs-utils".
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257411
Title:
mount.cifs ignores iocharset even specified
--
Ubuntu-server-b
@munchkinguy The Samba-Team are the upstream developers of Samba, they
don't maintain Samba in Ubuntu. The Assigned field is usually used to
set the person that's actually actively working on an issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Does anybody have a backtrace with the debugging symbols for
libnss_wins.so.2 installed? Having the relevant line numbers would be
very helpful in resolving this issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
ht
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 13:20 +, Firas Kraïem wrote:
> Debian doesn't use that revision anymore, but they don't mention this
> problem in the changelog for the newer ones, so I guess it is still
> present. I will report it.
Debian doesn't force the use of --as-needed at link time (yet?) as far
as
Debian doesn't include samba.schema either.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #190162
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=190162
** Also affects: samba (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
There's no need to compile samba from source to get the schema, as far
as I know upstream doesn't install the schema. You can get the schema
from the examples/ directory though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in u
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322339
Title:
Integrated permissions/ownership reset on file operations
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Chuck Short (zulcss) => Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd fails to start on b
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubun
This might be related to my fix for bug 596064.
What does 'testparm' output for you? Do you have 'disable netbios' set?
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'é
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 707561
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has
tu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notificatio
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707546
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can su
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'é
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'é
Thanks for the feedback. I managed to reproduce it, preparing a patch
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to i
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to instal
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'é
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'é
The attached patch fixes the issue for me.
** Patch added: "proposed patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/707563/+attachment/1807356/+files/707563.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'é
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'é
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'é
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie d'é
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
