On 04/05/2012 22:25, masteryoda wrote:
> samba works correctly regarding this matter
>
> The problem is with nautilus, respectively the handeling of the sharing
> icons by nautilus.
>
> ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
>Status: Confirmed => Invalid
>
> ** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu)
On 04/05/2012 23:18, masteryoda wrote:
> new bugreport on bugzilla.gnome:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675450
>
> ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #675450
>https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675450
>
nautilus-share is not part of nautilus. It is a plugin maint
On 05/05/2012 01:59, masteryoda wrote:
> Regarding the issue of the disappearing icons; isn't this a direct
> nautilus problem (not nautilus-share)?
>
> As far as I know, the nautilus-share extension package only extends the
> context menu and communicates with samba via net usershare (which is a
On 11/05/2012 21:48, masteryoda wrote:
> Does anyone know where to find to code for nautilus-share?
>
> We got a problem here:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675450#c13
>
git clone git://git.gnome.org/nautilus-share
--
Kind regards,
Loong Jin
--
You received this bug notificati
At this point, it looks like there's something wrong in Samba that
causes the usershares to not be exported, so I'm reassigning this bug to
that package instead.
** Package changed: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You r
I'm pretty sure it's not a nautilus-share issue. Nautilus-share only
deals with the output of "net usershare info" and manages user shares
via the "net usershare add" and "net usershare delete" commands. If "net
usershare info" says that the share exists, then as far as nautilus-
share is concerned
Looks more like a name resolution and presence detection issue more than
a configuration issue, so I'm reassigning to samba.
** Package changed: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu)
--
Shared folders (through Samba) when following instructions sometimes does not
work correctly
https://bugs
Some quick googling has revealed that this bug has been fixed, I think, and
here are the patches:-
https://attachments.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=5511
https://attachments.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=5522
Incidentally, this is the upstream bug report:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72
Hmm, the patches look like they have been applied already in Natty's
package. Are there any Natty users experiencing this bug?
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a bug
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/69547170/Stacktrace.txt looks like a
complete stack trace for Natty. And since there are so many duplicates
of this bug, I'm bumping the importance.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => Critical
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomple
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #8104
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8104
** Changed in: samba
Remote watch: Samba Bugzilla #7202 => Samba Bugzilla #8104
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs
Okay, I think I've found the issue, based on a crash with liferea:-
At wins.c:95, we have
DEBUGLEVEL = 0;
Somewhere in source3/include/debug.h, we have
#define DEBUGLEVEL *debug_level
extern int DEBUGLEVEL;
In source3/lib/debug.c, we have:
int DEBUGLEVEL = &debug_all_class_hack;
Based on this,
Okay, here's an updated patch which actually compiles, and I'm not
getting the bug on my machine any more.
** Patch removed: "debdiff-debuglevel.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/529714/+attachment/2089845/+files/debdiff-debuglevel.patch
** Patch added: "debdiff-debu
I don't feel up to trekking through glibc's source code, so I've just
added a glibc target to this bug for the time being.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Natty)
Assignee: Ubuntu Server Team (ubuntu-server) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Patch added: "Debdiff against samba 2:3.5.8_dfsg-1ubuntu2.1"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/529714/+attachment/2106114/+files/debdiff-debuglevel-2.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba
On 10/04/2012 07:09, masteryoda wrote:
> How about this for a start:
>
> Instead of just creating the error message, the net usershare command
> should at least delete the corrupt usershare definitions. Still this
> does not solve the remove/rename problem but that is not as severe as
> obsolent s
On 11/04/2012 05:09, mojo risin wrote:
> Not sure if related
> http://pastebin.com/qENT0yiK
>
> Started when I was trying to purchase something via paypal.
> (using lubuntu 11.10)
No, this is unrelated, Please file a new bug.
--
Kind regards,
Loong Jin
--
You received this bug notification be
Yeah I see it too. Looks like a regression in samba.
affects ubuntu/samba
status new
tags + regression-release
--
Kind regards,
Loong Jin
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Package changed: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307104
Title:
package samba-common-bin 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 failed to
in
** Package changed: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu)
--
Share name collisions possible between user and global shares
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628529
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubu
Reassigning to samba, since it looks like it's failing to create a
usershare.
** Package changed: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Public bug reported:
affects ubuntu/byobu
When hitting F8 and renaming the window with a space inside, the command throws
an error and doesn't actually rename the window. "C-b ," from tmux's default
config works correctly though.
>From tmux's default config:
bind-key , command-prompt -I #W "
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 03:51:49PM -, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> What version of Byobu are you running? I see that this is already fixed
> in trunk...
The one in raring:
byobu:
Installed: 5.35-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 5.35-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 5.35-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://sg.arch
Public bug reported:
affects ubuntu/byobu
status new
UPSTART_* environment variables aren't updated in tmux after an xsession
restart. This results in the initctl commands throwing up error about a missing
/com/ubuntu/Upstart/...
Workaround:
$ tmux set-option -g update-environment "DISPLAY S
semantically different than
> the comments and the original posting implies.
>
I believe it is the same issue -- crippled filesystem (driver)s that do not
implement ownership and/or permissions properly.
--
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411)
Ubuntu Developer
--
FUSE filesystems
As per Václav Šmilauer's post, all that's required after the samba
installation is a restart of the session, i.e. logging out and logging
back in. The current nautilus-share prompts the user after the auto-
installation of samba (and libpam-smbpass) to restart the session.
Hence, I'm marking this a
I'm reassigning this to samba, because this is a bug of the 'net'
utility, not nautilus-share.
** Package changed: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) => samba (Ubuntu)
--
Samba usershares in lower-case
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
r the bug that this is a duplicate of, it's marked as fix released.
Please post any issues and reopen the bug if you still see the same
issue in the latest version of nautilus-share, which is 0.7.2-6.
--
Regards,
Chow Loong Jin
--
Nautilus : Called "net usershare info" but it failed
invalid
--
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411)
Ubuntu Contributing Developer
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Invalid
--
files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership,
instead of "nobody"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
On Wednesday 21,October,2009 01:46 AM, Serhey Kusyumoff (Сергій Кусюмов) wrote:
> Posted a reply. Take a look. Couldn't get the first command to show
> anything
>
> У вт, 2009-10-20 у 17:29 +0000, Chow Loong Jin пише:
>> update-alternatives --display net
>
Thank
** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Sharing options refuses to creat a network forlde via smba saying: no such
folder, testpam
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453500
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is s
ts ubuntu/samba
status invalid
--
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411)
Ubuntu Contributing Developer
** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
when creating share through nautil
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #6676
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6676
** Also affects: samba via
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6676
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
files incoming through nautilus-share should be created with user ownership,
shares. This pretty
much means that unless anyone can come up with a solution for making this work
automatically within nautilus-share code, this bug is not going to go anywhere.
--
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411)
Ubuntu Contributing Developer
--
files incoming through nautilus-share sho
so it seems. I'll mark this as affecting samba as well then. net isn't
supposed to take so long to finish.
affects ubuntu/samba
status new
--
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411)
Ubuntu Contributing Developer
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
t;ping $(hostname)" ? Could you attach your
> /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/hosts ?
>
Out of curiosity, why does 'net usershare info' need to resolve a hostname?
What
hostname would this be anyway?
--
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411)
Ubuntu Contributing Developer
causing issues, then
perhaps it's a faulty /etc/hosts? falstaff, could you attach your /etc/hosts
and
the output of "hostname -f"?
--
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411)
Ubuntu Contributing Developer
--
net usershare info takes too long (was: Nautilus hangs fro
e info' should *really* finish fast.
I mean, there really isn't any reason 'net usershare info' should be looking
anywhere but the usershares directory, which is local. Even if vnet[0-2]
existed
and could be resolved, 'net usershare info' does not use that informatio
like a dream, I have a feeling that
> these drives would now be inaccessible if I created another user on my
> machine.
I have a feeling that at least one of the "UID" occurrences should actually be
umask, though I'm not sure. Could you look into it and correct as necessary? I
39 matches
Mail list logo
