** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002
Title:
Impossible to disable IPv4
--
Ubun
Fixed in newer releases, as you say. I suspect that this may be the
upstream commit responsible for fixing it, which would mean that it was
fixed in OpenSSH 4.9p1:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/openssh/main/revision/5290
I've applied this patch to version 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu2~ppa1 in th
Confirmed, the patched version works as expected, both options actually
work!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002
Title:
Impossible to disable IPv4
--
Ubuntu-ser
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: munin
The ip_ plugin in 1.4.5-3ubuntu2 fails to handle IPv6 addresses when
/bin/sh is being linked to dash.
Ways to reproduce, assuming the local IPv6 address being
2001:16d8:cc88:0:223:aeff:feb1:b64.
root@stilgar:~# ip6tables -I OUTPUT -s 2001:16d8:cc8
** Bug watch added: munin-monitoring.org/ #1009
http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/1009
** Also affects: munin via
http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/1009
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, wh
Marking the bug as triaged, given that it has both been confirmed and
fixed upstream. The fix, making the plugin explicitly use bash, has been
committed to svn and is scheduled to be part of munin 1.4.6.
** Changed in: munin (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: munin (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: munin
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713646
Title:
IPv6 functionality in ip_ plugin assumse #!/bin/sh being bash
> php5-fpm has been removed from upstream so im closing this bug.
Upstream svn doesn't agree with you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706945
Title:
php5-fpm package do
Yes, you do seem to have a conflict between apache and lighttpd, yet
that isn't what causes the installation of backuppc to fail. Here we
have the relevant error message
* Starting backuppc...
2011-02-04 16:32:11 Can't create a test hardlink between a file in
/var/lib/backuppc/pc and /var/lib/ba
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: etckeeper
etckeeper is not run during an apt-get remove or apt-get purge like it
is during an apt-get install.
This means that the version control system doesn't specifically track
the changes in /etc that result from removing packages.
I'm using a hook
Ubuntu 10.04
When starting kvm or qemu under vdeq
vdeq qemu -sda1 qemu-image -m 128
NOTE: vdeq is now DEPRECATED -- both QEMU and KVM have native support for
VDE. This binary will be removed soon from the distribution, consider
stopping using it.
--
You received this bug notificatio
As of openssh 1:5.6p1-2ubuntu3 (natty) at least the the ssh-keygen -R
trick has been added.
andreas@stilgar:~$ ssh lucy
@@@
@WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @
@@
Confirmed in Ubuntu 11.04 virt-manager guest, LibreOffice Calc, in a
Ubuntu 10.10 host. The impact is minimal as the Calc file opens fine
anyways, despite the crash.
WORKAROUND: Run Calc from the Terminal with the -nologo switch:
localc -nologo (FILE)
md5sum natty-desktop-i386.iso
3185a6c65bc6a19
Andreas
Many thanks for pointing me back to the detail of the error report
itself.
I've run the checks it suggests (df. df -i, etc) and include for your
information a copy of the output of the terminal session showing (as far as
I can tell) that there was no essential problem beyond the fact that
Same problem with Ubuntu 10.04 and latest Apache with IPv6 enabled:
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS
Release:10.04
Codename: lucid
$ uname -a
Linux 2.6.32-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 06:07:29 UTC 2010 i
@Serge, where is located that PPA with Lucid's libvirt package fixed, so
I can test it too?
Do you know when this it's going to be SRU'd? It's been a lot of time
since Lucid (LTS) is out and this bug is *very* annoying. :-/
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
I have another question,
Putting "pre-up ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:00:00:00:00:01" in the
interfaces config file, like Carlos did, is a workaround to the bug?
Just to clarify :-)
Regards
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 445154 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445154
Yeah, seems like you are running into the same permission issues as in
bug #445154. Marking this report as a duplicate.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 445154
package backuppc 3.1.0-4ubuntu1
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 445154
package backuppc 3.1.0-4ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to backupp
Never mind that about the duplicate. While there are similarities to
comments later on, your issue isn't the same as the original issue
reported in that bug report.
Looking closer at your term log I see that there are no mention of any
backuppc user being created? Have you had backuppc installed b
Nice, thanks Andreas for noticing that.
And thanks Colin Watson for the fix:
openssh (1:5.7p1-2ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
* Resynchronise with Debian experimental. Remaining changes:
- Add support for registering ConsoleKit sessions on login.
- Drop openssh-blacklist and openssh-blac
** Changed in: backuppc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204
Title:
package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upg
The message as of right now is:
IP-addresses to listen on for incoming SMTP connections:
Please enter a semicolon-separated list of IP addresses. The Exim SMTP
listener daemon will listen on all IP addresses listed here.
It has been that way since at least 4.63-9. The additional help seems
the
venu, apt daemon or something else may have been running at the same
time:
debconf: DbDriver "config": /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another
process: Resource temporarily unavailable
Please retry the operation (as I'm sure you've done by now since this as 18+
months ago.
Closing
Hi simmel,
I know this has been open a long time. Are you still affected by it? Can
you elaborate on "didn't work". Specifically:
1. What steps did you take to produce the problem.
2. What did you expect to happen
3. What actually happend?
Marking Incomplete pending response.
** Changed in: exi
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: exim4
exim4 (4.74-1) experimental; urgency=low
* 4.74 release, should build on hurd again.
* Fix some lintian --pedantic issues: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license
maintainer-script-without-set-e debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing
-- And
** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Artur Rona (ari-tczew)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708023
Title:
exim 4.74 released fixes CVE-2011-0017
** Patch added: "debian-ubuntu.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/713855/+attachment/1832999/+files/debian-ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Want to be sponsored by Kees Cook!
** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in ubuntu.
https:/
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
If I want to share a directory using samba
/home/manu/Music
but /home/manu has permissions rwxrwx---,
smbclient fails with the following error:
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
which does not help at all to understand the issue.
Dolphin only says that the folder does not exist.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713869
Title:
wrong permissions in samba shares are not properly reported
--
Ubuntu-
[Expired for samba (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
[Expired for cups (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618633
Title:
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to r
Could you please tell us if the VMs that won't boot are SMP VMs? I know
it's the SMP kernel but what I mean is, is KVM giving the VM more than
one CPU? If they are SMP VMs, could you please try to make them single-
CPU and try to boot them, then let us know what happens? I am seeing a
bug with L
The guests were single cpu server kernel, more info tomorrow.
On Feb 5, 2011 10:55 PM, "Brian Knoll" <712...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Could you please tell us if the VMs that won't boot are SMP VMs? I know
> it's the SMP kernel but what I mean is, is KVM giving the VM more than
> one CPU? If th
36 matches
Mail list logo
