** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu Hardy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Thierry Carrez (ttx)
--
Reload action on init script kills daemon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686
You received this bug notification bec
Uploaded.
** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
Reload action on init script kills daemon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius
please leave SRU bugs at 'in progress' until the uploads are accepted
into -proposed.
** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
Reload action on init script kills daemon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686
You received this bug notification becaus
Public bug reported:
Not an error?
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
Dependencies:
libgcc1 1:4.3.3-5ubuntu4
gcc-4.3-base 4.3.3-5ubuntu4
findutils 4.4.0-2ubuntu4
debianutils 2.30ubuntu3
libc6 2.9-4ubuntu6
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
ErrorMessage: package dhcp3-common is already installe
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29038459/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
package dhcp3-common 3.1.1-5ubuntu8.1 failed to install/upgrade: package
dhcp3-common is already installed and configured
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399638
You received this bug noti
** Package changed: dhcp3 (Ubuntu) => nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
--
package dhcp3-common 3.1.1-5ubuntu8.1 failed to install/upgrade: package
dhcp3-common is already installed and configured
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399638
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
The changelog says "- debian/control: have samba suffest ufw" but the
control file has a Depends. It should be Suggests.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
samba 3.4.0 depends on ufw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399468
You received this bug notification because yo
lvm2 package should drop a hook for it's configuration in initramfs.
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it
shouldn't
https://bugs
Please add
mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}/etc/lvm
cp -p /etc/lvm/lvm.conf ${DESTDIR}/etc/lvm/lvm.conf
to the lvm hook. This does no harm and helps a lot with drbd.
I have almost given up with drbd and ubuntu cause of this issue until i
was pointed to this bug entry.
Problem exists in jaunty (9.04) as well
I've uploaded a fix for lvm2. I don't think initramfs-tools itself
requires any changes, so I'm marking that task Invalid.
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it
shouldn't
https://bugs
This bug was fixed in the package lvm2 - 2.02.39-0ubuntu11
---
lvm2 (2.02.39-0ubuntu11) karmic; urgency=low
* Copy /etc/lvm/lvm.conf into the initramfs (LP: #246324).
-- Colin WatsonWed, 15 Jul 2009 13:52:21 +0100
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix R
This bug was fixed in the package samba - 2:3.4.0-1ubuntu2
---
samba (2:3.4.0-1ubuntu2) karmic; urgency=low
* debian/control: Suggest ufw, (LP: #399468)
-- Chuck ShortWed, 15 Jul 2009 10:01:41 -0400
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
sam
I ran slapd with -d any and figured out that the problem is in the
following lines in /etc/ldap/slapd.conf (it seems they were added by
package update script)
overlay syncprov
syncprov-checkpoint 100 10
syncprov-sessionlog 100
Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the exact error message - this slapd
Thank you for assigning this bug to someone. Is there any other info I
should provide?
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in
I cannot reproduce this; I can successfully install and upgrade
libsasl2-2 on intrepid, jaunty, and karmic.
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You received this bug n
Kees, what do you use to perform the installation? Here, both APT and
aptitude fail as shown above, during an upgrade. This behavior is
verified on both Debian and Ubuntu, using APT and aptitude.
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194140
You receiv
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dovecot-common
/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf and /usr/share/dovecot/dovecot.conf refer
users to /dev/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf instead of /etc/dovecot
/dovecot-postfix.conf.
** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Here is my intrepid machine upgrading libsasl2-2:
# lsb_release -d
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
# apt-cache policy libsasl2-2
libsasl2-2:
Installed: 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2
Candidate: 2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1
Version table:
2.1.22.dfsg1-21ubuntu2.1 0
500 file: intrepid-security/ma
I did run fsck with the drive mounted. Now installations and uninstallations
do not go smoothly. Pls how can I rectify that?
Arinze
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Chuck Short wrote:
> Looking at the logs in this bug reports, it looks like you have some
> dpkg database corruption.
>
> Regards
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Here is my intrepid machine upgrading libsasl2-2:
I'm really wondering what I'm doing wrong then. Could some APT or
Aptitude command option cause this to fail?
--
Dependency cycle prevents upgrade of libsasl2-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Steve Beattie offered the following feedback on IRC:
re samba; I ran the security team's qa-regression-tests
against it, but that doesn't say much about winbind.
This still leaves some risk of regression, but is better than what we
had; given the alignment with the 8.04.3 point release I'm going
This bug was fixed in the package samba - 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8
---
samba (3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8) hardy-proposed; urgency=low
* Added debian/patches/fix-winbindd-crash-dc.patch:
- Fix winbindd crash when calling getent group on domain controller (LP:
#328874)
- upstream commit
I don't know surely, but samba depended on samba-common-bin before this
release and now only recommends
--
samba 3.4.0 depends on ufw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399468
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
Here is the virtual host config from the procedure documented in:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/394350/comments/15
It is file:
/etc/apache2/sites-available/default
** Attachment added: "default"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29096236/default
--
RLimitCPU has no effe
When I was testing I had forgotten that there had to be a local disk
present for open-iscsi to get loaded. I retested this morning with a
dummy hard disk in play and the install completed successfully. Thank
you all for your hard work on this one!
--
iSCSI install fails under hardy
https://bugs
What needs to be done to make the open-iscsi-udeb load earlier in the
install sequence so its block devices are available to disk-detect?
Sounds like the initramfs problem is solved.
As for blowing away the networking, one possible solution: if the
installer knows what interface the initiator cam
26 matches
Mail list logo
