Quoting rossjenkins (rossawjenk...@gmail.com):
> The latest official Ubuntu Samba update regresses the one in Thierry's
> ppa repository. I used Synaptic Package Manager to force the Samba
> packages back to the ones from Thierry's ppa and then used Synaptic
> again to lock those versions so they w
The real solution would be to finally get this fix included in Ubuntu.
I'm not sure who's feeling responsible for Samba packages on the Ubuntu
side of things. Given that intrepid is on 3.2.3, the patch would have to
be backported anyway, so there's no need to wait for the next 3.2 bugfix
release.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
8.04.1 newly installed. Xeon 5130, 10 GB RAM
samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7f97b5ddb700 (LWP 19763)]
0x7f97b2fe34a5 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6
#0 0x7f97b2fe34a5 in waitpid ()
> I'm aware that the write patch is kind of large, but at least the
segfault is an easy target.
Well, yes, but not anymore, the work has been done now..
Since Thierry already made version 3.2.3 packages with this fix included, the
Ubuntu Maintainers "just" need to take his patchset and include it
That's not what I'm talking about. the bigger the patches you pull in,
the bigger the risk of regressing other things that used to work. I
doubt Thierry's patches have been tested by many people not affected by
this bug. While I personally doubt there's a problem for standard
setups, I can understa
Well the patches are from the Samba developer Volker Lendecke, but for version
3.2.5 (or 3.2.6 or such) and have been backported to 3.2.3 by Thierry.
So you think that the backporting would cause regressions?
As I'm no developer, I have to cope with your opinion here, so thank you
for this info.
Are you sure you are in a disconnected state. I don't see it would be
possible to do what you describe since the authentication attempt are
against a local cache and never sent to the DC.
How are you determining you are a offline state?
--
likewise-open: allows lockout while disconnected
https:
Blueprint changed by Thierry Carrez:
Definition Status: Discussion => Drafting
--
/etc under revision control
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/etc-under-revision-control
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe a
I'm sure I'm in a disconnected state, because I'm not physically
connected to a network which can reach a DC of the domain in question.
I'm not talking about a lockout of the account on the DC, I'm talking
about a lockout implemented by likewise-open on its local cache.
The exact error is: "The a
Public bug reported:
Bacula Version: 2.2.8-5ubuntu7
Package does not install desktop-entry.
Desktop file and an icon are shipped with the sources in script dir.
** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
package bacula-console-qt does not install desktop en
I'm kinda busy those days, but I'll refresh my PPA tomorrow with a
2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.5~ppa1 that builds on the recent security release.
Concerning the official intrepid update, I'll file a SRU report and let
the ubuntu-sru powers decide if the fix is worth the regression risk, as
this is definitely
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
Binary package hint: openssl
Please see the details in the oCERT advisory #2008-016:
http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2008-016.html
"Several functions inside the OpenSSL library incorrectly check the
result after ca
hi guys just thought i'd add my findings.
i was getting the "Error -1073741772: share not available" when trying to
access my shares after an update some months ago. I noticed today that shares
could be accessed if they where ext2 or ntfs but if they were vfat then it
wouldn't work.
Formatted on
hi guys just thought i'd add my findings.
i was getting the "Error -1073741772: share not available" when trying to
access my shares after an update some months ago. I noticed today that shares
could be accessed if they where ext2 or ntfs but if they were vfat then it
wouldn't work.
Formatted on
I have been doing some experimenting and I found something I do not
understand and it may have something to do with this problem. I
recently took node that when the iscsi disks are running slow I am
missing a process, specifically: /usr/sbin/iscsid.
It starts out that iscsi is running slow, I tak
I confirm the problem in 8.10 with Windows Server 2003 & Windows Server
2000 authenticated shares. If I open nautilus and type in the location
smb://., works fine. Using Places->Connect to server throws up the
error messages "No application is configured ..."
--
SMB error: Unable to mount loc
Seconded. I'm also running Ubuntu 8.10 (with smbclient version 3.2.3)
and experienced a similar problem recently. I have three entries like
the following (accessing different folders on the server) in my fstab:
//helios/public /media/helios-public cifsdefaults,noatime,auto 0
0
Previousl
I'm using "sudo mount -a" to mount these shares by the way.
--
'mount error 13 = Permission denied' when user mounts cifs (sudo works!)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
Quoting Thierry Carrez (thierry.car...@ubuntu.com):
> I'm kinda busy those days, but I'll refresh my PPA tomorrow with a
> 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.5~ppa1 that builds on the recent security release.
>
> Concerning the official intrepid update, I'll file a SRU report and let
> the ubuntu-sru powers decide
Replying to Christian Perrier & Daniel Eckl:
Sorry guys, I didn't mean to sound like I was recommending that everyone
lock in Thierry's ppa Samba patches without the most recent security
fixes. It is a balance between usability and security and in my specific
case the usability aspect trumps the s
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
Status: New
This solved it for me:
http://www.snailbook.com/faq/mtu-mismatch.auto.html
"You probably have an MTU/fragmentation problem. For each network
interface on both client and server set the MTU to 576, eg ifconfig eth0
mtu 576"
If 576 doesn't work try 1000.
--
expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP
ht
I'm also having this problem with a new install of Ubuntu 8.10 LAMP Server
(+ubuntu desktop) on a mixed Win/OSX network.
[New Thread 0xb74946d0 (LWP 7227)]
0xb79bb424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#0 0xb79bb424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb75d85e3 in waitpid () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0
OpenSSL issue is fixed in http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-704-1.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
OpenSSL signature verification API misuses
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
S
openssl (0.9.8g-14ubuntu2) jaunty; urgency=low
* SECURITY UPDATE: clients treat malformed signatures as good when verifying
server DSA and ECDSA certificates
- update apps/speed.c, apps/spkac.c, apps/verify.c, apps/x509.c,
ssl/s2_clnt.c, ssl/s2_srvr.c, ssl/s3_clnt.c, s3_srvr.c, and
don't remove, just:
$ sudo a2dismod alias
$ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade
--
package apache2.2-common 2.2.9-7ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283187
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
[SRU] for broken header parser
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
This problem appeared after I upgraded from Hardy to Intrepid.
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
crashing with SIGABRT while scanning network or reading some files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293233
You received this bug notification because you a
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu release: 8.10 (also exists in 8.04)
openssh-client package version: 1:5.1p1-3ubuntu1
When ssh'ing to any server, ssh prompts using a GUI dialog box for the
password for any public keys in ~/.ssh, even if those public keys can't
be used to authenticate to the server.
I
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Dapper)
Importance: High => Low
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Feisty)
Importance: High => Low
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Importance: High => Low
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: High => Low
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Bug 293233 contains a SIGABRT backtrace which might be the same crash
we're seeing here.
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
fusesmb - Not working properly.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198351
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Also affects: openslp-dfsg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: openslp-dfsg (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: ntp (Ubun
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #5847
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5847
** Also affects: samba via
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5847
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
crashing with SIGABRT while scanning network or reading some files
https://bu
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #5847
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5847
** Also affects: samba via
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5847
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
fusesmb - Not working properly.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198351
You re
This bug was fixed in the package tomcat6 - 6.0.18-0ubuntu5
---
tomcat6 (6.0.18-0ubuntu5) jaunty; urgency=low
[ Thierry Carrez ]
* Removed tomcat6-[admin,docs,examples].post[inst,rm] and let Tomcat webapp
autodeployment features handle application load/unload (LP: #302914)
*
This bug was fixed in the package tomcat6 - 6.0.18-0ubuntu5
---
tomcat6 (6.0.18-0ubuntu5) jaunty; urgency=low
[ Thierry Carrez ]
* Removed tomcat6-[admin,docs,examples].post[inst,rm] and let Tomcat webapp
autodeployment features handle application load/unload (LP: #302914)
*
Tying together more related bug reports...
(Debian 503038 and Samba 5847 contain some enlightening comments from
the smbnetfs and samba developers)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503038
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497572
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Tying together more related bug reports...
(Debian 503038 and Samba 5847 contain some enlightening comments from
the smbnetfs and samba developers)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503038
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497572
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
That worked great, thanks for your help.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Chris Crisafulli wrote:
> Thanks for submitting this bug in efforts to help improve Ubuntu.
>
> Did you completely remove or purge samba-common? Can you try running:
> sudo apt-get purge samba-common .
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marki
Public bug reported:
If you need I can attach my slapd.conf file
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ErrorMessage:
ErrorMessage: Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
Package: slapd 2.4.11-0ubuntu6
SourcePackage: openldap
Title: package
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20996268/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20996269/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz
** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz"
http://launchpadlibra
This bug was fixed in the package logwatch - 7.3.6.cvs20080702-2ubuntu1
---
logwatch (7.3.6.cvs20080702-2ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
[ Bhavani Shankar ]
* Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes: LP: #314620
- Use postfix rather than exim4.
- Fix logwatch.pl for ser
Thanks for working on the merge. I've uploaded it with a minor
correction: keep the bug number references in the changelog:
- Fix logwatch.pl for servers that have the same hostname as a config
variable (ie: medium). Thanks for Nathan Crawford. (LP: #296349)
** Changed in: logwatch (Ubuntu
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
OpenSSL signature verification API misuses
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-ser
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Could you attach your slapd.conf file?
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
package slapd 2.4.11-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314917
You rec
I attach all configuration files:
- /etc/ldap/slapd.conf
- ~/etc/ldap/slapd.conf
- ~/etc/ldap/adressen.ldif
In the original slapd.conf file I inserted an include option in last
line which includes my local configuration file. I created a local
configuration file for an Evolution LDAP addressbook.
I created a local slapd.conf config file so that it gets not overriden
when dist-upgrading Ubuntu.
How about a directory for future Ubuntu versions:
/etc/ldap/slapd.conf.d/
There could be inserted more config files for different database
definitions. In my point of view it would be great to intr
** Attachment added: "LDIF file for initial setup of Evolution LDAP addressbook"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20997286/adressbuch.ldif
--
package slapd 2.4.11-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314917
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Ok, I just have seen, that there is already a config directory for slapd
available: /etc/ldap/slapd.d/
--
package slapd 2.4.11-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314917
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is su
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
Samaba
Using Ubuntu 8.10
The version of samba installed 2:3.2.3-lubuntu 3.4
The automatic update of samba failed to install. The download didn't
have any trouble but during installation an error (I closed the error
window by mistake) was launched
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21000106/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21000107/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
samba update filed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314952
You received this bug notifica
My question is related to this bug:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/53478
And Helzibah, when i use sudo mount -a it is working :s...off course my fstab
if mentioned to let it mount at user elvel. So that i can mount them without
security risks
So with the sudo my user option i
52 matches
Mail list logo
