Re: [Bug 203169] Re: "status" function for init scripts

2008-12-04 Thread Onno Benschop
I'm not going to tell you what to do, but it seems to me that coding defensively would be smart. -- "status" function for init scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubunt

Re: [Bug 203169] Re: "status" function for init scripts

2008-12-03 Thread Onno Benschop
On 04/12/08 08:03, Dennis Pattmann wrote: > Hi Onno, > > I don't use "exit 0 || exit $?" because I would like to check all > Daemons, and if the ybserv maybe don't run the script will exit without > checking the other daemons like ypbind > > You do realise that most scripts are running under a s

Re: [Bug 203169] Re: "status" function for init scripts

2008-06-02 Thread nxvl
Yes, that's what i meant, but as i see on the debian-policy bug on BTS some DD's want to check the packages using it before including that on the DP, but that's only a policy issue, not a real technical one, i also hope that Debian include the lsb-base patch, but if not we can include it on the ubu

Re: [Bug 203169] Re: "status" function for init scripts

2008-06-02 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Nicolas Valcárcel (nxvl) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Onno: Please update your patches whenever the lsb-base package is > uploaded into the ubuntu repositories including the patch suggested by > Dustin. Thanks for your work! Nicolas- We're really hoping Debian will